Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2001, 01:17 PM
pmh3r pmh3r is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Brooklyn, NY U.S.A.
Posts: 188
Default Logic Performance

Anyone have any idea what kind of track count I would be able to get with a g4 867 and a standard IDE IBM Deskstar with Logic Platinum?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2001, 09:01 AM
pmh3r pmh3r is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Brooklyn, NY U.S.A.
Posts: 188
Default Re: Logic Performance

bump [img]images/icons/shocked.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/rolleyes.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2001, 10:55 AM
lwilliam lwilliam is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Allison Park, PA (Near Pittsburgh)
Posts: 5,099
Default Re: Logic Performance

Lots of people are claiming 40-50 tracks.
__________________
Larry

PT 2021; MacBookPro M1; 16GB; Spectrasonics; Native Instruments, Toontrack, Waves...too many plugins.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2001, 11:02 AM
Johnny Almanza Johnny Almanza is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: LA CA 90048
Posts: 19
Default Re: Logic Performance

I have a mac g4 400, 768 ram and I recently got 42 tracks. I dont know how much further I could have gone, thats all I needed for that song. I usually dont need that much but this tune had some major vocal stacking. Its great to have that many tracks when you need them.
I am loving Logic Audio!!!!!
J.A.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2001, 10:17 PM
j creasey j creasey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 313
Default Re: Logic Performance

thats my setup a 867 with 256ram to logic and i have been up to 73 tracks with ample plugins NO KIDDING [img]images/icons/shocked.gif[/img] it is a far more cpu friendly system than pt le.
james
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-14-2001, 10:23 PM
Nocturnal Nocturnal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: England
Posts: 223
Default Re: Logic Performance

i think Im gonna cry [img]images/icons/frown.gif[/img]

N
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-14-2001, 11:29 PM
Kickin.da.speaker Kickin.da.speaker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 2,081
Default Re: Logic Performance

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR> thats my setup a 867 with 256ram to logic and i have been up to 73 tracks with ample plugins NO KIDDING it is a far more cpu friendly system than pt le. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Using which audio interface? Logic+001 is limited to 64 tracks...
__________________
David.

6am eternal
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-15-2001, 06:41 PM
j creasey j creasey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 313
Default Re: Logic Performance

i am using logic with the digi 001 and in fact if you use universal track mode in logic you are right it is 64 tracks but those
are STEREO tracks without universal mode it is 64 mono tracks my count is based on one stereo track=two mono tracks ! because in the same way a stereo track takes twice as much disc space as one mono track it also takes twice as much cpu.my exact count was 24 stereo tracks and the rest mono.please keep in mind that along with those plugins were 2 waves trueverbs plus assortted comps and eq's some vst some logic and the others waves.what it really comes down to is i love my 867 and its great to use pt le without the worry of cpu shortage.
james
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-15-2001, 06:48 PM
Kickin.da.speaker Kickin.da.speaker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 2,081
Default Re: Logic Performance

Oh OK, well you can't really count like that cuz it's not the same. A stereo track takes actually 1.5 the space of a mono track on a hard drive, and as far as the CPU goes well it's almost the same for the CPU between a stereo or a mono track. Anyhow, the limit is 64 stereo or mono tracks, so you could never have more than 64 tracks, whatever they are.
__________________
David.

6am eternal
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-15-2001, 07:37 PM
accession accession is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: On the road again... (Australia)
Posts: 1,319
Default Re: Logic Performance

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR>Originally posted by Kickin.da.speaker:
A stereo track takes actually 1.5 the space of a mono track on a hard drive<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Not quite sure that's true. Forgive me if I'm wrong [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img], but that would suggest compression of some sort.

AIFF/WAV doesn't compress anything (that I'm aware of). 1 min silence is the same as 1 min at full volume.

Then, say you were to record a band for a minute by placing a stereo microphone into the room, the two sides that make up the stereo signal will each require their own 60secs worth of recording time.

This would equate to double the amount of space then say the band had been recorded using a single mono microphone.

Phil [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wow - PT 11 beats Logic X in CPU performance! Chingy Pro Tools 11 10 08-23-2013 10:55 AM
PT9 Performance lacks vs. Logic 9 & Live 8 audifett Pro Tools 9 5 11-19-2010 09:09 AM
Logic 8 to logic 7 session won't open! saving procedure need crizdee Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 9 04-26-2008 08:09 PM
Logic vs PT stability/performance issues Ian-H 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 7 01-09-2006 10:17 PM
PTLE vs. LOGIC performance innesireinar 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 01-16-2005 10:29 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:04 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com