Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-27-2010, 11:15 AM
gaas gaas is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin
Posts: 86
Default 7.4 more DSP efficient than 8?

Hey guys!

What do you think about the idea of 7.4 being more dsp efficient than 8? Just out of curiosity
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-27-2010, 03:49 PM
bonfi64 bonfi64 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milan italy
Posts: 148
Default Re: 7.4 more DSP efficient than 8?

of course it is, version 8 i fullfilled with new VI (7.4 don't) and his very heavy on the CPU, this has to do with the fast answer to logic 8, i was on Le with 7.4 and now on HD with 8, Le on tiger was very stable and rarely crash. but Apple came out with Leo and PT have to make a new version very fast, so short time to test version 8, but you know who are the tester in today software?
WE ARE, we should be paid to test new version!!!!!

Pt 9 no, i'll go straight to 10
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-27-2010, 04:08 PM
Stig Eliassen's Avatar
Stig Eliassen Stig Eliassen is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Norway @ Studio Varmt & Trangt
Posts: 7,455
Default Re: 7.4 more DSP efficient than 8?

Quote:
of course it is, version 8 i fullfilled with new VI (7.4 don't) and his very heavy on the CPU
Gaas is talking about DSP, not CPU and VIs.
__________________
Studio rig - Pro Tools|HDX 2018.7 | Logic Pro X.4.2 | Avid HD I/O (8x8x8) | 6-core 3.33 Westmere w/24GB RAM | OS 10.12.3 | D-Command ES | Eleven Rack | Vienna Ensemble Pro 5
Mobile rig - Macbook Pro i7 w/16GB RAM | UA Apollo 8p | Pro Tools|HD 2018.3 | Logic Pro X.4.2 | OS 10.12.6
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-28-2010, 01:44 AM
bonfi64 bonfi64 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milan italy
Posts: 148
Default Re: 7.4 more DSP efficient than 8?

i'm not a tech guy, but i noticed that user like you PT lover stay with the old PT 7.4 and tiger, and with a solid HD3 sistem, wich i guess very stable and solid, so i come to conclusion that is better stay two years behind instead to try (and paid) a new version every 6 month. and don't you think DSP efficency affect CPU? like lots of users complains in PT version 8? i read on this forum many problems loading few TDM plug ins and having the heavy CPU window. i was told when i bought my sistem that you can overload with TDM plugs your session and version 8 is absolute stable, but i discover that you can load maximum 5 or 6 TDM, so i paid 100 to get only 40 from my HD sistem.
maybe because i did the upgrade last year with 54% off the full price!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-28-2010, 05:07 AM
Camilo Orozco's Avatar
Camilo Orozco Camilo Orozco is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Toluca, Mexico
Posts: 969
Default Re: 7.4 more DSP efficient than 8?

I'am still at 7.3 and OSX 10.4, very stable.

I wil go "up to" 7.4 and OSX 10.5 this week (on a separate HD just in case I dont like it)
__________________
Camilo Orozco
Like us on www.facebook.com/artedigitalestudio
www.estudiodegrabacion.com.mx
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-28-2010, 06:05 AM
Brandonx1 Brandonx1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,974
Default Re: 7.4 more DSP efficient than 8?

To answer the original question, you might be able to use a couple more TDM plug ins in 7.4 then 8. They changed the way delay compensation works in 8. They included busses in ADC in version 8 and that takes a little more DSP. The amount of DSP in a TDM system is the same but PT uses more DSP for ADC in version 8. Most people will never notice the difference tho. Around 8.1 or so, digi also fixed a DSP bug that made the mixer share chips on the TDM cards better. So around 8.1, I actually saw a boost in DSP and TDM mixer flexibility in surround sessions.
Best,
Brandon
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-28-2010, 06:11 AM
Stig Eliassen's Avatar
Stig Eliassen Stig Eliassen is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Norway @ Studio Varmt & Trangt
Posts: 7,455
Default Re: 7.4 more DSP efficient than 8?

Quote:
i'm not a tech guy, but i noticed that user like you PT lover stay with the old PT 7.4 and tiger, and with a solid HD3 sistem, wich i guess very stable and solid, so i come to conclusion that is better stay two years behind instead to try (and paid) a new version every 6 month. and don't you think DSP efficency affect CPU?
The reasons that I stay on PT 7.4 and Tiger goes beyond Pro Tools itself. For one, this setup has been extremely stable - it just works.
Furthermore, I don't want to part with my UAD TDM bundle as I use those in every mix. I am in the process of finding replacements, but I'm not in a hurry. Who knew that even plugins have different character?
I bought PT 8 when it was released, and I have installed it on a separate drive with Leopard. I didn't like the GUI much, but that is more me being afraid of change. There are some awesome features for the ICON consoles in v8 that I can't use when being so frickin' stubborn, so it's been a bittersweet decision so far.

DSP efficiency may affect the CPU - this is beyond the scope of my knowledge, and, quite frankly, field of interest. But, OP talks about DSP usage, not CPU usage.
__________________
Studio rig - Pro Tools|HDX 2018.7 | Logic Pro X.4.2 | Avid HD I/O (8x8x8) | 6-core 3.33 Westmere w/24GB RAM | OS 10.12.3 | D-Command ES | Eleven Rack | Vienna Ensemble Pro 5
Mobile rig - Macbook Pro i7 w/16GB RAM | UA Apollo 8p | Pro Tools|HD 2018.3 | Logic Pro X.4.2 | OS 10.12.6
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-28-2010, 07:13 AM
bonfi64 bonfi64 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milan italy
Posts: 148
Default Re: 7.4 more DSP efficient than 8?

ok, so the latest 8.1 is a bug fix, i have it already on a separate drive, will try thanks, anyone can confirm that DSP affect CPU usage? i'm just guessing because i imagine once the cards are fully loaded PT, put under pressure mac pro CPU and the CPU error window came out, i'm right or wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-28-2010, 08:18 AM
Brandonx1 Brandonx1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,974
Default Re: 7.4 more DSP efficient than 8?

DSP and CPU are two completely different things. That's why TDM is so great. Tons of power and not host processing loss at all. RTAS is host based tho. So if you are using RTAS plug ins or VI's then those are CPU based. PT 9 is probably the best in terms of host processing load.
Best
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-28-2010, 12:46 PM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,901
Default Re: 7.4 more DSP efficient than 8?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bonfi64 View Post
ok, so the latest 8.1 is a bug fix
8.1 is not at all a bug fix !!! it brings most of the PT9 new features to HD systems plus H.E.A.T. is a huge thing that requires 8.1 or later.

sure, it also fixes some bugs, but it's a real feature release
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DSP Efficient Plugins? lunatic Pro Tools TDM Systems (Win) 2 05-12-2008 06:31 AM
CPU efficient QT Codec? Tim R. Post - Surround - Video 4 08-21-2007 07:55 AM
Efficient Rev for LE DannyG 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 4 03-06-2007 12:15 PM
is duy not dsp efficient ?? stealthbalance Tips & Tricks 2 06-23-2003 12:53 AM
What’s the most efficient way to go from 24/48 to 16/44? jmsx521 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 2 06-18-2003 10:00 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:29 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com