|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I Can Assure You TDM is Far From Dead
Quote:
__________________
http://www.stevegalante.com |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: I Can Assure You TDM is Far From Dead
Quote:
Hi, TDM is not Dead! but its had nothing new for 7 years which was accel cards! PT9 brought nothing new for TDM except a few more nails in the coffin. It still has a very good place for now! but can't see any new TDM exclusivity from here on. Just watch how quickly plugin vendors start to focus on native and leave TDM The idea of a separate card or box to do calculations is history Chris
__________________
PT MAC Troubleshooting... http://duc.avid.com/showthread.php?t=54888 Producer, Engineer, UKmastering Mixing & Mastering Blinders_Columbia top 40 UK album charts Slow Readers Club Joy Of The Return #9 UK album charts www.ukmastering.com PT10.3.10 Mountain Lion HD6 accel Magma PE6R4 D Command 32 MacPro 12 Core 3.46ghz UAD-2 Octo x2. Manley Vari-Mu, Manley Massive Passive, SSL VHD, ADL600, Grove Tubes ViPre, Tube-Tech CL-1B. Hafler TRM active monitoring. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I Can Assure You TDM is Far From Dead
Quote:
http://www.tc-now.com/default.asp?id=350&cur=2 But I still think my TDM rig will be superior to a non-TDM rig regardless. Until non-TDM can do things that I can't in TDM, not really an issue. But is it worth the price to carry it? But the cost differential has been essentially eliminated. You only get what you pay for. Want better interfaces? Buy them. Want sync? Clocking? I/O ? You will only get what you pay for, right?
__________________
--Jeremy |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I Can Assure You TDM is Far From Dead
Quote:
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Re: I Can Assure You TDM is Far From Dead
TDM's "replacement" will probably use the Euphonix brand and their technology.
That's why they bought them right? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I Can Assure You TDM is Far From Dead
Quote:
TH |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I Can Assure You TDM is Far From Dead
Bump for some Clarity.
__________________
HD Native Pcie, PTHD 11, PT12 Vanilla, Omni, Lynx Aurora 16, 192 I/O (16 in/8 out), 24 Fader D-Command, lots of preamps and compressors. MacPro 5.1 (12) Core (2009 MacPro 8 Core Upgraded to a 12 Core MacPro), 56 Gig Ram, SSD System & 3 - 2TB Drives, OSX 10.9.5, Windows 10 Via Bootcamp |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I Can Assure You TDM is Far From Dead
I was just about to get an HD system (now that I can afford it). But when HDX came out, I was like NOOOOOOOOO!!!! but then I starting thinking.......my motherboard has 2 pci slots and 2 pcie slots. hmmmmm. So What I am planning to do is get an Hd1 system off ebay. I can buy the card separate, brand new interface in the box cheap and pick up a HD8 license for around $100. My issue is that chances are the card will already be registered so how will I upgrade? And there are some complete system for $1799 but if I buy piece by piece, I can get it cheaper ($600 interface, $700 core card and HD8 $130) for a total of $1430. It will last for at least 3-5 more years and I can easily add on one of the newer interfaces. Plugins can be had for cheap and I can pick up accel cards at will as well as a magama pci to pci to add more cards. So for less than the price of an apogee ensemble or rme ufx, I can have a TDM system that I could still run in native mode as well as use it with cubase. Am I on the right track guys? Your thoughts and thanks in advance!
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
001 dead? | ghostarbeiter | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 6 | 04-17-2012 11:48 AM |
192 i/o almost dead? | DaV- | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Win) | 6 | 12-16-2011 03:48 AM |
Dead 96 I/O | velvettone | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 6 | 08-18-2009 08:08 AM |
Please help dead PC | neeel | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 13 | 02-12-2005 09:48 AM |
Is 001 dead? | Tuchagrey | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 5 | 07-09-2000 10:14 PM |