|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A Question About Class-Action Lawsuits
This isn't meant to start ANYTHING, and it's MERE COINCIDENCE that I'm posting it right now. I'm not threatening, implying or suggesting that anyone should sue DigiDesign. Okay? Okay..
A few years back, Quark released a new version of QuarkXPress that screwed a lot of people over. Money was lost, time was wasted, clients were upset, business was hurt. Same with Apple's 10.2.8 debacle. Same with Macromedia's MX suite for OS X. Same with Windows ME or CE or whatever it was they released a couple years ago. Same with a lot of software titles. Now, you can say "stay off the bleeding edge" and "if it's not broke, don't fix it," all you want, but I think most people (ie: jurists) would agree that a person should be able to purchase a product and trust it to work. So, if a company releases a product and that product's un-advertised and unexpected shortcomings causes it's customers' businesses to suffer, shouldn't that company be held accountable? If the answer to the above question is 'yes' (and I think that it is), what's stopping class-action lawsuits in these instances? And if the answer to THAT question is "Well, nothing, really...", then what might the ramifications of a high-profile class action lawsuit be? Would companies simply stop releasing bad code? Or would companies release painfully slow updates in fear of unleashing bugs? Or would companies be forced to start offering public lists of "known issues" - something like what you typically get in a Read Me file with new software, AFTER you've paid for and installed it - with any new release? Again, I'm NOT trying to start an argument, and I'm NOT really interested in suing anyone, but I've often wondered about this. Any armchair lawyers on the DUC?
__________________
Mac G4 Dual 533 1.5g Ram OS 10.2.8 Reason 2.5 ProTools LE 6.1 Digi001 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Question About Class-Action Lawsuits
Well in the first place I'm only an armchair lawyer, so I'm not foisting myself off as being certain of what I'm talking about. That having been said...
To start, I think if there was any merit in such a lawsuit (legally speaking), they would already be in court. We litigate EVERYTHING in this country, and people use the courts to stuff their pockets all the time. Secondly, I think that you'd have to demonstrate that there was true negligence on the part of the company in putting the product out. You'd have to show either that they knew there were defects and put the product out anyway OR that they did not adequately test the product. Third, you'd have to demonstrate that it was REALLY a defective product. I know people who use Windows ME and it works fine for them. In terms of operating systems, you can't expect the company to test an OS with every single piece of software that might possibly use it. That's insane. Finally, whenever you install software, you usually have to click an agreement that holds the company that made it legally harmless for any damage it does. This pretty much kills any possibility of a lawsuit in the crib. But who knows. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Question About Class-Action Lawsuits
Interesting, especially about the agreement. I really should read those, huh?
__________________
Mac G4 Dual 533 1.5g Ram OS 10.2.8 Reason 2.5 ProTools LE 6.1 Digi001 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Question About Class-Action Lawsuits
Quote:
i'm a fairly new user -- purchased my 002 in april of this year and i use an ibook g3 733 which runs ptle 5 on os9. i know this is already "old" technology and there are newer versions of digi hw/sw and apple hw/sw that have different functionality. but i don't think there's actually any damage to me. i can keep working in this environment for the forseeable future and when i feel like i've milked my current setup for all it's worth, i'll look around at whatever options are avaialble at that time (i.e,. a g7 w/ptle 10.8 on os XIV). maybe we can discuss this using a car analogy. if i buy a 2003 honda and in 2004 they come out with a whole new host of features for that model but i can't have access to them, have i really been damaged? i have the option of selling my '03 for an '04, or waiting until '07 when i want that year's latest & greatest. is this analogy useable for this discussion? steve |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Question About Class-Action Lawsuits
Quote:
You finally break down and buy a new Honda, and as soon as you get it home, you find that your new car won't start half the time. Even worse, you rely on the car for business purposes (delivering pizza) and are now out of work because of it's failures. You're absolutely right about showing ACTUAL damages. I'm thinking the studio guys, pro shops, etc., not hobbyists like myself who are merely inconvenienced. For that, I'll switch software providers, but I don't get to sue over it. As for proving that said product was defective, I think that's a weak argument. If you buy a car with air conditioning and find out that your air conditioner doesn't work in Florida (ie: our software doesn't work with your system), is it your loss because Honda can't possibly know what states their AC is going to work in? Of course not, they sell a product, and it's their responsibility to see that it works or at least provide some recourse when it fails in these "unforeseeable" situations. I admit that expecting testing on every PC isn't realistic (testing every Mac IS, however), but a money back guarantee would make a lot of sense in this regard. Those "agreements" (why don't we get to read those agreements BEFORE we purchase the software, or at least be able to return the software if we don't agree to the agreement?) might be the a software provider's saving grace, but it seems that anyone who's been burned by bad software should be entitled to a refund and tech support for uninstallation, and anyone who's been monetarily damaged by bad software should be entitled to the same, plus compensation for any losses. Surprising that someone hasn't tried something like this...
__________________
Mac G4 Dual 533 1.5g Ram OS 10.2.8 Reason 2.5 ProTools LE 6.1 Digi001 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Question About Class-Action Lawsuits
In fact, you might have a case about getting to return the software if you disagreed with the agreement. Since you could not possibly have known the specifics of such agreements when purchasing the software, it seems reasonable that you should be able to return the software. In essence, requiring you to agree to something after the purchase is kind of making you sign an agreement under duress.
To be sure, breaking the seal on a software CD package is often considered a "final purchase," but if you didn't know you'd have to agree to something in order to use the product, there is a definite legal issue there. Whether or not there is an established case history for such an issue I can't really say. That's where a real lawyer might be able to clarify things. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Question About Class-Action Lawsuits
You know what guys?
As a G4 Powermac user, which is less than a year old, and will not be supported with the new release this Friday, I'm as frustrated with Digi as anyone. But look, they are offering us this DUC which THEY pay for, and THEY maintain. This kind of talk really doesn't belong here any more than dissing someone who invited you into their home for a beer. In fact, I'm amazed they have let us blow off steam on the DUC to the extent they already have. If this topic is to be explored, I suggest it be taken to a neutral site.
__________________
MacPro 8X 2.26 Ghz cores, 15 GB RAM, OS 10.6.8 PT9/Waves Platinum 8/Waves Restoration Bundle 8, W43/ Cedar DNS One/iZotope Rx2/Odds and ends |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Question About Class-Action Lawsuits
Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Question About Class-Action Lawsuits
Caveat Emptor... Microsoft doesn't get sued everytime someone gets a bluescreen. Windows never purports to be crash-proof, and the license agreement disclaims any responsible for loss and/or damage. The situation is the same with Digidesign.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A Question About Class-Action Lawsuits
That's what indemnification is for in just about any agreement between two parties. It's usually a clause that says you as the user will hold [software company] harmless from any loss or damage resulting from the use of their software, other than loss from willful negligence and outright fraud on the software company's part. They go on to say that the [software company] makes no represenations or warranties that the software is guaranteed to be 100% bug free, though they have made best efforts to do so. And proving willful negligence a priori and outright fraud in a court of law (or mediation conference) which resulted in harm or substantial damage to you is more expensive in terms of time, energy and money than any revenue you've actually lost or what users can prove they collectively lost.
This doesn't mean they can't be sued - but it's written so that it's not really worth your time unless it causes something traumatic like death, personal injury, or financial disaster - all consequences that a piece of software is highly unlikely to cause. Lawsuits take time, lots of lawyer $$$, and effort to process - and collecting on damages is yet another story. As for lawsuits, there needs to be tort reform...well that's another discussion. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Class action lawsuit | concordantmind | Pro Tools SE and Essential (Win) | 4 | 10-25-2012 01:34 AM |
NVIDIA Class Action Lawsuit | L-Dogg | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 10-02-2010 09:55 PM |
NVIDIA Class Action Lawsuit | L-Dogg | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 1 | 10-02-2010 08:22 PM |
NVIDIA Class Action Lawsuit | L-Dogg | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 10-02-2010 03:14 PM |
Audigy/Extigy class action lawsuit... | Rail Jon Rogut | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 7 | 06-06-2005 01:10 PM |