![]() |
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
iyo, what is acceptable latency? i have recorded vocals, guitar, bass, keyboards with my mbox 2 at 128, and no one has said anything. i have even asked a few of my clients if they could hear any delay, not one has said yes. what are you guys setting your hardware to?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I use 128 or 64 with the 002r when tracking. Never had a problem with either.
I've also used 256 at times, but I personally feel 256 is on the fringe. I notice it quite a bit at 256, while others don't.
__________________
My Website: Pro Tools "Newbie" Help Studio rig: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R, Intel i7 920, 6GB Patriot DDR3, NVidia 8600GS, LG GGW-H20L BD-RE, Sony CRX195E1 CD-RW, 2x WD Caviar black 640GB (os swap), 1x WD caviar 320GB (sessions), 1x Maxtor 120GB (sessions), 1x Seagate 1TB (samples/loops), Profire2626, Command8, PT12 on OSX Mobile Rig: 2015 MacBook Pro Retina, Apollo Twin, PT12 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a web page about that. Gives details incuding samples and milliseconds for latency at each hardware buffer setting. Some opinions about why it's not as big a deal as some might think.
http://www.elvenminstrel.com/recordi...002latency.htm
__________________
David J. Finnamore Nyquist was right. PT 2020.11.0 Ultimate | Omni | macOS Mojave PT 2020.9.1 | Saffire Pro 40 | Win10 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
It's about how much you have done it and how much you trust yourself. That said, in my experience, even most live artists tend to slower the tempo when 512 buffer has been tried, but going back to 256 has made it groove. If you're on a big stage, you most likely don't have perfect monitoring. You will have to rely on what you see and what you expect to happen. It is not uncommon to have other band members 10-15 meters away (roughly 20ms of latency) and play in perfect sync -- it's a skill to have a metronome inside your own head instead of the monitor
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
128. Even experienced session drummers don't notice that amount of latency. Also, I don't like switching the buffer to a higher setting for mixing. I simply track and mix at 128: pretty much a non-issue for me.
__________________
Desktop: PT 2020.5 / Win 10 / GIGABYTE GA-X58A-UD3R / i7 hex 3.9GHz / 32GB / Focusrite LS56 Laptop: PT 2020.5 / Win 10 / HP ProBook / i7 quad / U-PHORIA UMC1820 Legacy: PT 5 & 6 / OS9 & OSX / Mac G4 / DIGI001 Click for demo |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is 003 Factory acceptable for Audio Post? | studer | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 13 | 05-12-2010 07:45 AM |
acceptable volumn problem | johnmo2 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 2 | 12-15-2005 11:35 AM |
A normal/acceptable amount of crashing? | east3rdst | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 32 | 11-07-2001 10:45 AM |
Unity DS-1 and Latency... Anyone else feel the latency makes the Plugin unusable? | Mt.Everest | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 7 | 08-26-2001 05:53 PM |
multiple compression layers—acceptable? | dex | Tips & Tricks | 2 | 06-29-2000 01:48 AM |