Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-10-2002, 03:33 PM
jimlongo's Avatar
jimlongo jimlongo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: T_dot
Posts: 2,827
Default dithering scenario

Check this out . . .

If you go from say 16 bit to 24 bit the bottom 8 bits will just be zeros, no? Then if you go from that 24 back to 16 is there any need to dither since what is being cut off are only zeros anyway?

That's what I hope. What do you think?
__________________
noise | jimlongo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-10-2002, 03:42 PM
Inaam Inaam is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 101
Default Re: dithering scenario

FWIW, I think if you do any change at all in the 24 bit domain, from eq to rendering fades to even turning the volume down a dB, that you will lose resolution going back out 16 without dither.

Anyone care to clarify or expand on that? I'm sure if you do a search on dither you'll find lots more detailed info.

Hope this helps

Inaam
__________________
--Inaam
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-2002, 04:23 PM
AE AE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 471
Default Re: dithering scenario

Quote:
Originally posted by Inaam:
FWIW, I think if you do any change at all in the 24 bit domain, from eq to rendering fades to even turning the volume down a dB, that you will lose resolution going back out 16 without dither.

Anyone care to clarify or expand on that? I'm sure if you do a search on dither you'll find lots more detailed info.

Hope this helps

Inaam
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">This is true.

It sounds like you may be passing a 16 bit signal through a console with 24 bit resolution and then back to another 16 bit destination. If so, as long as you follow the suggestions above the correct technique is to defeat dither on the console outputs. This is one of those rare situations in which you'll reduce bit length without dithering.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2002, 04:39 PM
jimlongo's Avatar
jimlongo jimlongo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: T_dot
Posts: 2,827
Default Re: dithering scenario

I'm just talking about straight digital transfers.
__________________
noise | jimlongo
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-10-2002, 06:13 PM
Barnaby Bristol Barnaby Bristol is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Posts: 166
Default Re: dithering scenario

Jim. Correct. If you load a16-bit source into a 24-bit file and then output from the 24-bit file without doing any processing, it should be 16-bit clean. It helps to have a bit meter to assure that you've done it correctly. Things to remember: In Pro Tools, a stereo track is 16-bit clean if the fader is at '0' and both pans are hard left/right. A mono track is 16-bit clean with the pan either hard left or hard right and the fader at '0'. If any other tracks or auxes are assigned to the same output and have instances of plugins that are 48-bit dithered to 24-bit, a bit meter will show 24-bit. You should still be able to truncate without dither since the 24-bit dither is well below the 16-bit level. If you are using the 24-bit optimized mixer "HiRes Dithered Mixer" you will still see 24-bit on your bit meter. If you only have one summing point between your source and output than you should be fine outputting and truncating without dither.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-11-2002, 09:00 AM
awestaa awestaa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: scottsdale, az.
Posts: 7
Default Re: dithering scenario

Barnaby,

What exactly is a 'bit meter' and where do I get one? Is this some specific software product you are using? Where to do you insert it to read bits? Do you use it on files? Well maybe you could just point me to a web site where I can find all this stuff out rather than try and explain....I understand software development and I've used software products on ip traffic streams etc., but I've never heard of this relative to digital audio...it sounds useful.

Thanks,

Andy

___________
www.xen.com
__________________
_________________
www.andywest.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-12-2002, 12:09 AM
jimlongo's Avatar
jimlongo jimlongo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: T_dot
Posts: 2,827
Default Re: dithering scenario

Thanks Barnaby. That is helpful.

As far as testing I am asking this question in regards to laybacks which are out of my control. The way it has been explained to me a 16 bit da88 will be transferred to a 20 bit HDCam which will have 16bit DigiBetaCam dubs.

So I am assuming that 16 to 20 to 16 has no truncation distortion during this process.

Thanks again.
__________________
noise | jimlongo
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A scenario and a question. Elton Hyland MIDI 7 03-12-2009 02:40 PM
PROBLEM SCENARIO yeehawchicken 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 3 09-22-2006 07:18 AM
How would you mic this scenario CCash Post - Surround - Video 4 03-18-2004 02:12 PM
I got a scenario for you guys.... Kevin Jackson 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 13 09-14-2002 12:33 AM
Advice on the whole studio scenario io 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 13 03-28-2000 03:18 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com