|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Problem with Issues and Issues with Problems
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Avid officially kills Sugar Bytes TransVST
Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Avid officially kills Sugar Bytes TransVST
Quote:
I didn't talk about PT, I was talking in general, because I'm tired of these kind of comments. Justify everything because "they have to make a profit" yeah, I understand, but I also understand before 80ies, 90ies, things were done to achieve a goal, profit was just a consequence. I feel pretty duped when I read things like "finally now aux are compensated correctly" calling this a feature.. actually Avid always stated PDC works perfectly you don't have to worry about anything (as all the others DAWs).. well guess what, I never believed that, I ended up compensating everything manually.. and I got the results I was expecting, PDC didn't give me that... Now PT11 seems to have solved this problem Or when I read things like "now automations are time stamped.." uh thank you Or what about VI and midi not time stamped And what about I put two sinewaves recorded to track and for some reason, sometimes don't null together.. or they null together.. then I turn on PDC and they don't null together anymore.. then I turn off PT two times.. and they null together again.. after some time, for some reason they don't null any more. That's one of the curious things I've experienced in PT9 (tested without any plug in on) and I got a friend reproduce it in PT10.. I hope has been solved in 11.. but that problem lead to the fact that when I was mixing using PDC.. after a while, things didn't sound properly.. I turned off PT two times and then they sounded properly again.. but I had to change the plug in settings I had changed in the last hours I was working, redoing half the work.. just because of a bug? Or are we talking about the numerous number of -6101 errors and similar? Is that an expected behavior that leads to expected results? When you are recording a performance and suddenly everything stops because you get this error.. or the other one -9028 if I'm correct..? Errors that manifest themselves even with NO plug ins and few tracks? In a perfectly optimized system to be used with PT. Do we pay for that? Is it part of the PT features? Do you translate that with "PT deliver the expected results"? What do you tell to the artist you were recording that, once he finally achieved the right level of inspiration, mood, to record "the best take" he is able to deliver.. well.. unfortunately there's a crash.. and your track is gone lost... oh wow.. then the guy start losing that right mood, confidence.. because he thinks.. no matter how I good I can do it, I also have to be lucky that nothing stops while I'm performing Are all those results delivered as expected? Because if they are so, maybe it is me that I've chosen the wrong DAW for me, probably these are features other people like, maybe all the artists in the world like to lose a performance because of one of those cute errors.. because they keep them entertained.. I don't know Those are just a couple of the things in which PT doesn't deliver the expected result (IMO), but it is not just an Avid problem.. it is pretty much all in that way today. I found like one or two companies that deliver what they advertise, no more. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Avid officially kills Sugar Bytes TransVST
Quote:
If you weren't talking about PT then why did you even post in a 7 month old thread that has nothing to do with what you wrote? And if you've found product that does what you want and PT doesn't then why not use that product? Why waste your time here then? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Avid officially kills Sugar Bytes TransVST
Why does this thread still prompt arguing?
VST can be hosted in Pro Tools. Audio Units, too. Maybe Sugar Bytes TransVST bit the dust, but let's see what is out right now that can integrate VST with Pro Tools, shall we?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Avid officially kills Sugar Bytes TransVST
Quote:
There's so many options it's not even funny; but I guess some people like Mr. Gibberish (now there's an appropriate screen name) can't see that and just because the world doesn't turn their way they get all in a huff. |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: Avid officially kills Sugar Bytes TransVST
Quote:
Quote:
Is there anything illegal in doing this? Do I need your approval? Quote:
Regarding PT I'd just like to being able to use it in a stable way, I don't care about features.. the greatest feature of PT11 for me is time stamped and curved automation... I just care to have it working properly specially when you have a supported computer and you've optimized it as Avid says. Quote:
And also, may I ask you another question? Why are you there wasting time in replying to a my post about two old posts in a 7 months old thread? Thanks Quote:
My opinion on this is I don't want to deal with other software's bug, poor integration and unpleasing surprises.. considering I spend more time solving problems caused by software then producing and finding workaround to bugs and stuff like that. I need an environment I can trust, that's the main reason that justify me spending money. Personally the ideal for me would be the ideal for Avid too.. being able to use the plug ins I like in AXX.. hoping that PT11 is now at level of being considered not a beta test product sold as new as it was PT9 and PT10. That said, if plug in developer don't port their plugs in AXX, Avid, IMO, should start considering there must be some reason why this doesn't happen, instead just forcing developer in doing the AXX version of their plugs.. maybe there's something Avid could do incentivize developers in doing AXX version of their plugs, because all the time I had the opportunity to talk with some of them about that, they told me it is a pain and a big loss of money, doing the AXX version of plugs.. reasons they told me is that costs a lot of money, it is very hard to get them approved and you are doing that just for a very small cut of users, yeah the pro ones, but VST standard have all the rest Another very good option for me is that, if VST works good for any other one.. why not implement and optimize VST in PT.. still using AXX as first choice, but being able also to put VST in there My problem is, for example, I need to use Sylenth1 in PT because is essential to me, because recording it in real time in PT gives me the best quality of all the other DAWs I tried (Ableton, Logic).. even thought to use it I use a wrapper :P |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Avid officially kills Sugar Bytes TransVST
Quote:
If you've noticed, VST is kinda the wild west. Along with the great variety, there's also a wide range of compatibility issues. With AAX, this isn't really a problem - the plug-ins are developed with a solitary host in mind. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Avid officially kills Sugar Bytes TransVST
His opinion is absolutely valid. If the "experts" (also referred to as fan boys) can freely insult and antagonize (subliminally or directly) those who are struggling, then don't expect it to stop. It really comes down to the bare facts: Pro Tools is a phenomenal concept but the product is unreliable for MANY not all customers. Until that changes, until Avid can deliver a fully tested and ROCK solid release that will function efficiently and completely on a wide array of systems, until they drastically reduce the price of the product that is essentially beta tested and troubleshooted at no cost to Avid by unsuspecting customers for upwards of a year after a release, until certain users on here change their demeanor toward unhappy people, this hostile environment is inevitable. So we can either respect each other's differences or continue on.
__________________
Windows 7 64 Ultimate: SP1 PT 10.3.8 ------------------------------------------------------ ¨WHERE´S MY CHECKBOOK?¨ https://soundcloud.com/louieshowers |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Avid officially kills Sugar Bytes TransVST
I simultaneously respect the opinion and disagree. My post was completely impersonal and did not say that the opinions of others are invalid. I would urge you to put away the "fanboy" stuff if you're making a plea for decorum and asking others not to antagonize.
__________________
Pro Tools HD 12.4, Pro Tools "Vanilla" 12.4, Artist Transport, 2x Artist Mix Studio Blue: RME UCX, Win7 Pro, i7 960, 16GB || Studio Green: RME Babyface, Win10, i7 7700HQ, 16GB |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mbox Gain Issues and Protools Issues (Bounce to Disk and Knob/Pot adjustments) | Lucky Bastard | Getting Started | 6 | 01-16-2014 03:29 PM |
No sound - asio driver issues - NTFS issues | mitchelljrickey | Windows | 0 | 06-21-2012 05:35 PM |
ProTools 9.0.5, iLok issues, Digi 003R+ issues | zachbot | Pro Tools 9 | 6 | 10-12-2011 08:19 PM |
8.0.4 Issues (Quick Punch & Mute/Solo issues) | pauledwards | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 1 | 10-06-2010 09:35 AM |
Digital Noise Issues - Clock Source Issues? | Gorbies | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 02-07-2010 01:55 PM |