Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Hardware > Pro Tools | Carbon
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 02-11-2021, 01:20 AM
Mark Ziebarth Mark Ziebarth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 845
Default Re: Any Carbon users who were using UAD Apollo before?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisdee View Post
So if I turn on Carbon DSP in PT it will handle all the mixing, routing, and aax dsp plugin duties on the track where it is turned on?

Any idea how big sessions I can run purely on the onboard DSP if Carbon befor it maxes out?

You’re right. I tested for tracking and maxed out the DSPs with the following:
24 Avid Channelstrips (on all inputs)
4 Sends on each channel to the headphones
5 Avid Pro Limiter, one on the Mix Bus and one per Headphone to avoid overs
2 ReVibe II
1 Tape Echo
2 Eleven
You have to consider how the plugs behave on the DSPs. A ReVibe II instance takes 57 percent of a DSP but two of them fit on one DSP. Eleven takes a whole chip etc.

Best

Mark
__________________
Mac Pro 2010 3.66 GHz six Cores, HD Native, 192 I/O, Avid Dock, Artist Mix and Pro Tools Ultimate
Mac mini 2018 i5 64 GB RAM, RME Fireface, Pro Tools 2021, Euphonix MC Control
MacBook Air 2020 (M1) 16 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD, Zoom U-44 and Pro Tools Ultimate
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-11-2021, 08:48 AM
quicksticks4 quicksticks4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 29
Default Re: Any Carbon users who were using UAD Apollo before?

I was (maybe still am?) an Apollo user attempting to make the switch to Carbon. As far as tracking goes, Carbon wins hands down. As a drummer, being able to run a 12 mic tracking session with the lowest latency is a game changer.

The one category that Apollo seems to win flat out is the i/o flexibility regarding third party software. I have started a specific thread regarding this, but it's relevant to this one as well since we're talking Apollo vs Carbon.

I do a lot of live streaming and Zoom drum lessons. The Apollo, for whatever reason, can easily route all audio being monitored (including computer playback) directly into other software such as Zoom, OBS, etc. It's as simple as choosing Apollo as the mic input.

I've spent far too much time trying to get Carbon to do the same thing. There are lots of clunky workarounds floating around including a separate interface listening to the headphone outs of Carbon, additional software that is doing limited routing within carbon, or having a second DAW open for monitoring. But there doesn't appear to be a straight up "route audio from Carbon to Zoom" option, for whatever reason.

So far this is truly my only knock on Carbon. But it's a big enough one that I'm still eyeing the return window, unfortunately.
__________________
System Details

My Website
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-11-2021, 09:19 AM
K Roche's Avatar
K Roche K Roche is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wilds of Wyoming
Posts: 2,307
Default Re: Any Carbon users who were using UAD Apollo before?

[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisdee View Post
So if I turn on Carbon DSP in PT it will handle all the mixing, routing, and aax dsp plugin duties on the track where it is turned on?
Yes and any tracks it is routed to as well (sends or output)


Quote:
The way a work (arranging/porducing/mixing) It would be best to leave the CPU purely for VI's and always run all plugins on Carbons aax dsp to offload my CPU.
Any idea how big sessions I can run purely on the onboard DSP on Carbon befor it maxes out?
In my work flow I don't run very many VI's usually not more than 1-4 max. and seldom more than 10 -15 maybe 20 tracks total
But as far as Max DSP use I did this short screen recording Which I linked in my 1 week thread.. Don't know if will help inform your use but it's here

https://youtu.be/0Qz2lcE9I0Y
__________________
System :
Studio - Avid Carbon interface , PT Ultimate 2023.12 Mid 2020 (intel) iMac 27" Ventura 13.2 .1
Mobile - 2021 14 " MBP M1 Pro PT Ultimate 2023.12.1 Sonoma 14.4



Enjoy the Journey
.... Kev...
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-11-2021, 09:49 AM
chrisdee's Avatar
chrisdee chrisdee is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 3,166
Default Re: Any Carbon users who were using UAD Apollo before?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Ziebarth View Post
You’re right. I tested for tracking and maxed out the DSPs with the following:
24 Avid Channelstrips (on all inputs)
4 Sends on each channel to the headphones
5 Avid Pro Limiter, one on the Mix Bus and one per Headphone to avoid overs
2 ReVibe II
1 Tape Echo
2 Eleven
You have to consider how the plugs behave on the DSPs. A ReVibe II instance takes 57 percent of a DSP but two of them fit on one DSP. Eleven takes a whole chip etc.

Best

Mark
Great, thanks for testing.

As I only record one track at a time sounds like I'v be able to reserve one DSP for a vocal recording audio track and use the other 7 on whatever tracks I need.

How about instrument tracks?
How does that work. Will the VI be disabled if I put aax dsp plugins after and turn on DSP?
__________________
Christian D Hagen | I7 Builds | PT/OS Compability Chart
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-11-2021, 10:29 PM
Mark Ziebarth Mark Ziebarth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 845
Default Re: Any Carbon users who were using UAD Apollo before?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisdee View Post
Great, thanks for testing.

As I only record one track at a time sounds like I'v be able to reserve one DSP for a vocal recording audio track and use the other 7 on whatever tracks I need.

How about instrument tracks?
How does that work. Will the VI be disabled if I put aax dsp plugins after and turn on DSP?

Native only plugs are bypassed when DSP mode is activated but you can exclude plugs from bypassing. The standard example is a reverb plug on an aux track: You leave it in native mode via excluding it from bypassing and take the latency as a pre-delay. I didn’t test with VIs but guess they will behave as other native only plugs.
__________________
Mac Pro 2010 3.66 GHz six Cores, HD Native, 192 I/O, Avid Dock, Artist Mix and Pro Tools Ultimate
Mac mini 2018 i5 64 GB RAM, RME Fireface, Pro Tools 2021, Euphonix MC Control
MacBook Air 2020 (M1) 16 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD, Zoom U-44 and Pro Tools Ultimate
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-12-2021, 10:40 AM
Kyle Splittgerber's Avatar
Kyle Splittgerber Kyle Splittgerber is offline
Avid
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 563
Default Re: Any Carbon users who were using UAD Apollo before?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Ziebarth View Post
Native only plugs are bypassed when DSP mode is activated but you can exclude plugs from bypassing. The standard example is a reverb plug on an aux track: You leave it in native mode via excluding it from bypassing and take the latency as a pre-delay. I didn’t test with VIs but guess they will behave as other native only plugs.
Yup, all VIs are Native-only so they are automatically bypassed in DSP Mode.
__________________
Kyle Splittgerber
Senior Principal Product Designer
Avid
Berkeley, CA
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-12-2021, 10:29 PM
chrisdee's Avatar
chrisdee chrisdee is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 3,166
Default Re: Any Carbon users who were using UAD Apollo before?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle Splittgerber View Post
Yup, all VIs are Native-only so they are automatically bypassed in DSP Mode.
Thats a bummer. Sounds like I will have to change my workflow completely and either freeze or bounce all my VI tracks befor I will be able to use the onboard aax dsp?

Sounds like Carbon is more for the recording of audio with plugins and not for a work in progress senario with no actual workflow, latency or resource improvement for recording and mixing VIs on the fly?
__________________
Christian D Hagen | I7 Builds | PT/OS Compability Chart
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-13-2021, 08:13 AM
Kyle Splittgerber's Avatar
Kyle Splittgerber Kyle Splittgerber is offline
Avid
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 563
Default Re: Any Carbon users who were using UAD Apollo before?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisdee View Post
Thats a bummer. Sounds like I will have to change my workflow completely and either freeze or bounce all my VI tracks befor I will be able to use the onboard aax dsp?

Sounds like Carbon is more for the recording of audio with plugins and not for a work in progress senario with no actual workflow, latency or resource improvement for recording and mixing VIs on the fly?
No, you don't need to do that. If you want to process VIs through DSP plugins you can route the Instrument/Aux track running the VI to an Aux running DSP plugins.

And, yes the priority for DSP power with Carbon is for recording workflows. But, you can still use it for offloading mix processing as mentioned above. Or, by ensuring that you run all DSP plugins on the track (although not an option for tracks with VIs or other Native-only plugins).
__________________
Kyle Splittgerber
Senior Principal Product Designer
Avid
Berkeley, CA
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-13-2021, 08:55 AM
chrisdee's Avatar
chrisdee chrisdee is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 3,166
Default Re: Any Carbon users who were using UAD Apollo before?

Ohh, thats great to hear. Thank you.
__________________
Christian D Hagen | I7 Builds | PT/OS Compability Chart
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-13-2021, 09:32 AM
Kyle Splittgerber's Avatar
Kyle Splittgerber Kyle Splittgerber is offline
Avid
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 563
Default Re: Any Carbon users who were using UAD Apollo before?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisdee View Post
ohh, thats great to hear. thank you.
👍🏼
__________________
Kyle Splittgerber
Senior Principal Product Designer
Avid
Berkeley, CA
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apollo users: Crashing and bugs in Pro tools resolved. stacyodellnyc Pro Tools 12 2 12-04-2022 04:40 AM
Apollo 8Pre or Apollo 8 QUAD? Kerochan Third Party Interfaces 1 11-27-2017 11:08 AM
For Windows users, review of Apollo Twin USB3 VRW Third Party Interfaces 0 09-18-2016 08:09 PM
Apollo users on Windows w/PT10 JGlen Pro Tools 10 0 12-11-2013 08:53 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:20 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com