Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-27-2001, 09:18 AM
j20056 j20056 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 690
Default A/B testing of outboard Lexicon Reverb versus Waves Renaissance

I checked a clean Fender Start sound (small amount of compression) on SM57-miked Vox AC15 on a setup with the Renaissance Reverb against the outboard Lexicon MPX500. Note that I was sending the MPX500 directly through my PA, not in and out of the 001, to avoid another round trip of AD-DA.
I used Large Hall 1 on RVerb versus the Large Hall on the Lex, and made sure the parameters were as close as possible.
By closing my eyes and switching back and forth, I truly could not detect *any* difference. That was amazing in fact.

I also compared the Ping-Pong effect setting of the Waves 2 Tap Delay against the same parameters of my outboard TCE D-Two. Thsi time, I found that the Waves plug-in was generating delayed sounds with less high-filtering than the TCE. Somehow, the TCE does not keep the highest frequencies (the little crunch of the tube amp with mild compression) although I went in the setup and remove any EQ or filtering of the delayed signal. The Waves delay was truer to the original sound in terms of EQ, but it was more brittle, with a small amount of intermodulation added on the amp's mild crunch in the 4-6k range.

I would be useful to hear other such tests done by users.
My next step is the MondoMod chorus against the Lexicon MPX500.
__________________
Digi002 Rack
Mac Pro 8-core 3Ghz
8gb RAM
3X 500GB 7,200 SATA DRIVES
OSX 10.5.7
PTLE 8.0cs3
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-27-2001, 10:49 AM
APAULOS APAULOS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 942
Default Re: A/B testing of outboard Lexicon Reverb versus Waves Renaissance

I did a similar experiment with Rverb and The TC electronic M2000. The M2000 was MUCH cleaner...it just had a more pleasing sound to the reverb. Light and spacious. Although each reverb has it's own color and can be used in different situations, I would say that the M2000 has far superior algorhithms.

This thread is a very good idea...I hope a lot of people contribute.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-27-2001, 08:48 PM
Vegadark Vegadark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Aurora, IL, USA
Posts: 509
Default Re: A/B testing of outboard Lexicon Reverb versus Waves Renaissance

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:<HR> intermodulation <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

wow. I haven't heard that word in about 2 - 3 years.
__________________
DIGI002R, PTLE8.0.5, Windows XP, Asus K8V SE Deluxe, AMD64 3000+ 1.5GB ram, ATI Radeon HD3xxx AGP, dual 19 inch LCD screens
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-28-2001, 08:54 AM
j20056 j20056 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 690
Default Re: A/B testing of outboard Lexicon Reverb versus Waves Renaissance

Not sure if intermodulation is the right word, but it seems that if you listen carefully, PTLE and some plug-ins tend to add a very small amount of high frequency noise, no exactly easy to describe in words, like brittle. The Lexicon direct sound did not produce this. I remember reading an interview of Steve vai way back then, where he also noticed that PT has this phenomena. It's very minor, though, and I'm perfectly happy with my 001.
__________________
Digi002 Rack
Mac Pro 8-core 3Ghz
8gb RAM
3X 500GB 7,200 SATA DRIVES
OSX 10.5.7
PTLE 8.0cs3
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-28-2001, 09:16 AM
Allen Hallada Allen Hallada is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sun Valley, ID
Posts: 6,686
Default Re: A/B testing of outboard Lexicon Reverb versus Waves Renaissance

I'm wondering if a little eq. wouldn't clear that up? I know what you are talking about though.
Allen [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-28-2001, 04:01 PM
Last Last is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: South Africa
Posts: 485
Default Re: A/B testing of outboard Lexicon Reverb versus Waves Renaissance

I have done one or two such plugin/outboard comparisons so far with PT.Dunno how applicable they may bebut here goes:

First one was last year,when I was an assistant engineer on an album by a well known Jazz guitarist.One of my jobs was to sounce any and all equipment this guy requiested,so I spent my days lugging every gawdamn tube amp on and off the market from shop or collectors house or stage to the studio.This guy would not even try amp farm cause it wasnt hardware.After all was done me and the head engineer decided to do some comparisons,using different axes,mics,pres and amps,against ampfarm.And the results were....inconclusive.What we did learn was that ampfarm was much cheaper,easier and friendlyer to the poor engineer,and that most people would not be able to tell the difference.In fact we tested the a/b recordings on some people after that,and often the guessed wrong,but they always guessed.

The secont test was the sansamp plugin against the sansamp pedal and the rackmount version.In this case the plugin was clearly superior to both in S/N ratio,userfrienlyness,flexibility and sound.We sold the rackmount to someone we didnt like and I kept the pedal cause I'm sentimental about these things.I still have it,but I've never ever used it since.

Another test was between the focusrite compressors,the EQ's and the related outboard Reds.Here I voted for the plug ins simply becuase the GUI made setting it up so much easier.And you got many tracks of it insted of just the one stereo insert the outboards give you.Soundquality wasnt remarkable different wehn used with Protools,but the outboard units sounded a lot fuller in both the high end and bottom end whan used of an analogue deck.gues 48 is 48 no matter what you do to it.
__________________
If you're gonna laugh about it later, you may as well laugh about it now
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-28-2001, 04:33 PM
Allen Hallada Allen Hallada is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sun Valley, ID
Posts: 6,686
Default Re: A/B testing of outboard Lexicon Reverb versus Waves Renaissance

Great post Peter,
I did some mixing on my newest song today and was amazed at what I could do with just the Ren. eq. Definitely worth learning these Rennaisance plugins for starters. I backed off on the reverb after getting the EQ set and the vocals sound much better. Hard to believe a 2000.00 outboard mic preamp or reverb unit would make that much difference now. Think I'll save my money. Especially after buying some new Monster Cable Studio Pro 1000 mic. cable. OUch!
Allen [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Waves Renaissance Compressor, Equalizer, Reverb, C1, Supertap Native Licenses V7 Phil Pelissier Buy & Sell 0 01-13-2013 08:54 AM
TL Space vs Waves Renaissance Reverb + IR-L Light yarrick19 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 5 02-22-2006 06:28 AM
Builtin Reverb plugin vs. Outboard Lexicon Verb tivdude 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 9 01-31-2005 06:00 AM
Waves Lexicon Reverb Plugin Allen Hallada 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 32 04-01-2003 05:11 PM
waves renaissance reverb jeff caldwell71 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 6 01-05-2003 07:07 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:21 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com