Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #211  
Old 07-08-2002, 09:33 PM
Lynn Fuston Lynn Fuston is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Spring Hill, TN, USA
Posts: 106
Default Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...

Quote:
Originally posted by bombfactory:

Remember: we model other gear. And you can't do things like model the subtleties of the output transformer in an 1176 until you've isolated all the other wackiness from the equation.
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">So Erik, when do we see that 888/24 plugin for HD? Or do you think you'll bring out that retro Blackface ADAT plugin first?

Lynn Fuston
3D Audio
__________________
Lynn Fuston
3D Audio Inc.
Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 07-08-2002, 10:09 PM
loudist loudist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 154
Default Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...

bombfactory...

all your questions (or most of them) had already been addressed in previous threads on this very forum as well as on PSW.

Here is one to get you started...
Chapter 1
__________________
We now have 2 generations that believe CD's are the best in audio reproduction. - Rupert Neve
Reply With Quote
  #213  
Old 07-09-2002, 01:50 AM
The Eggman The Eggman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 221
Default Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...

Loudass and others...

Can we try to stay on topic here? Hello! Perhaps you guys want to take your petty gripes to another forum...(start with PSW, since it's SO slow over there). This topic is all about trying to get Mixerman to come correct and substantiate his earlier "findings" that HD is down 6db @ 5ohz. Come into the light, Mixerman, and let's see what you got...
__________________
The Eggman
coo coo ca joob
Reply With Quote
  #214  
Old 07-09-2002, 03:22 AM
loudist loudist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 154
Default Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...

No, this is not your personal slam thread...

You are small minded and childish.

"Perhaps you guys want to take your petty gripes to another forum..."

Yes, why don't you?
__________________
We now have 2 generations that believe CD's are the best in audio reproduction. - Rupert Neve
Reply With Quote
  #215  
Old 07-09-2002, 06:28 AM
rpowell rpowell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 248
Default Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...

Quote:
Originally posted by bombfactory:


Any audio discussion quickly becomes bogged down in audiophile-speak. It's the "get out of jail free" card of audio debate.

--Erik
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">LOL! I'll have to remember that one.

RP
Reply With Quote
  #216  
Old 07-09-2002, 09:35 AM
The Eggman The Eggman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 221
Default Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...

Quote:
Originally posted by loudist:
No, this is not your personal slam thread...

You are small minded and childish.

"Perhaps you guys want to take your petty gripes to another forum..."

Yes, why don't you?
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial">Ah, there you go, off-topic again. Stay focused!
__________________
The Eggman
coo coo ca joob
Reply With Quote
  #217  
Old 07-09-2002, 10:39 AM
loudist loudist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 154
Default Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...

My posts have been related to the topic, where as yours are your own little p i s s y fest, again no, what you are selling as the topic is not what the rest here are discussing.
Why don't you take your own advice and start your own little petty pot shot thread, unless you have something constructive to add.

Let the idiotic migrate, with the Petty Pied Piper.
__________________
We now have 2 generations that believe CD's are the best in audio reproduction. - Rupert Neve
Reply With Quote
  #218  
Old 07-09-2002, 10:45 AM
bombfactory bombfactory is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 241
Default Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...

Originally posted by Lynn Fuston:
> So Erik, when do we see that 888/24 plugin for HD?

> Or do you think you'll bring out that retro Blackface ADAT plugin first?

If and when we run out of good-sounding gear to model, we'll move on to the crap.

--Erik
Reply With Quote
  #219  
Old 07-09-2002, 10:53 AM
slangification slangification is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nashville
Posts: 765
Default Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...

I'm setting some cash aside for the Mackie console emulator.
Reply With Quote
  #220  
Old 07-09-2002, 10:59 AM
stelios88 stelios88 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 31
Default Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...

I will conduct a test 7-9-02 tonight! I will do frequency sweeps thoughout the audio spectrum. I will calibrate and run the test to determine IF there is a problem with the 192 i/o. Specifically 6db down at 60hz. Since this will be easy to determine, I am going to make this test as simple as possible. I am not using an Audio Precision but will be using a test CD that was made using an Audio Precision.

This test will NOT determine if a Studer A800 sounds different than a 192. Of course they would sound different UNLESS you calibrate the two devices properly. Properly, means using an Audio Precision.

One last statement of FACT. If you put a test tone at 1k through ANY device that is properly calibrated, the tone SHOULD sound identical. The only way it COULD sound different (loudist) is if there is distortion, gain, or frequency imbalance. This is a FACT and I am not interested in debating the audio signatures of Neve, Studer, tubes, discrete, transformers, et al. You guys can argue that 'til your teeth fall out.

Please DO NOT try to defend what you heard at 1k. You did hear a differnce!!!! The devices where not calibrated and set up to make an objective test. That is the difference. The problem with six pages of this nonsense, is the mixing of subjective and objective perseption.
I promise the results will be fewer words than this post.

Steve
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Waves "Maserati Signature" and "CLA Classic Compressors" lowlights Buy & Sell 2 08-12-2013 10:36 AM
"Unable to locate digidesign hardware" Mbox (original) ProTools LE 7.4.2 Mac OS X sharpd 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 23 04-27-2012 01:11 AM
LE 8 install with Original Mbox: "Additional Files": Factory Bundle Installers amusos 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 0 08-17-2011 08:53 PM
New 27" imac / "original" mbox - need some clear advice.please help !! santococo 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 4 05-21-2010 11:30 AM
Switching a HD from "transfer only" to "record mode" BretFarewell 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 6 02-16-2010 01:49 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:53 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com