|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#211
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...
Quote:
Lynn Fuston 3D Audio
__________________
Lynn Fuston 3D Audio Inc. |
#212
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...
bombfactory...
all your questions (or most of them) had already been addressed in previous threads on this very forum as well as on PSW. Here is one to get you started... Chapter 1
__________________
We now have 2 generations that believe CD's are the best in audio reproduction. - Rupert Neve |
#213
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...
Loudass and others...
Can we try to stay on topic here? Hello! Perhaps you guys want to take your petty gripes to another forum...(start with PSW, since it's SO slow over there). This topic is all about trying to get Mixerman to come correct and substantiate his earlier "findings" that HD is down 6db @ 5ohz. Come into the light, Mixerman, and let's see what you got...
__________________
The Eggman coo coo ca joob |
#214
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...
No, this is not your personal slam thread...
You are small minded and childish. "Perhaps you guys want to take your petty gripes to another forum..." Yes, why don't you?
__________________
We now have 2 generations that believe CD's are the best in audio reproduction. - Rupert Neve |
#215
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...
Quote:
RP |
#216
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...
Quote:
__________________
The Eggman coo coo ca joob |
#217
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...
My posts have been related to the topic, where as yours are your own little p i s s y fest, again no, what you are selling as the topic is not what the rest here are discussing.
Why don't you take your own advice and start your own little petty pot shot thread, unless you have something constructive to add. Let the idiotic migrate, with the Petty Pied Piper.
__________________
We now have 2 generations that believe CD's are the best in audio reproduction. - Rupert Neve |
#218
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...
Originally posted by Lynn Fuston:
> So Erik, when do we see that 888/24 plugin for HD? > Or do you think you'll bring out that retro Blackface ADAT plugin first? If and when we run out of good-sounding gear to model, we'll move on to the crap. --Erik |
#219
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...
I'm setting some cash aside for the Mackie console emulator.
|
#220
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2" Transfer into 192--the original timeless classic. Accept no imitations...
I will conduct a test 7-9-02 tonight! I will do frequency sweeps thoughout the audio spectrum. I will calibrate and run the test to determine IF there is a problem with the 192 i/o. Specifically 6db down at 60hz. Since this will be easy to determine, I am going to make this test as simple as possible. I am not using an Audio Precision but will be using a test CD that was made using an Audio Precision.
This test will NOT determine if a Studer A800 sounds different than a 192. Of course they would sound different UNLESS you calibrate the two devices properly. Properly, means using an Audio Precision. One last statement of FACT. If you put a test tone at 1k through ANY device that is properly calibrated, the tone SHOULD sound identical. The only way it COULD sound different (loudist) is if there is distortion, gain, or frequency imbalance. This is a FACT and I am not interested in debating the audio signatures of Neve, Studer, tubes, discrete, transformers, et al. You guys can argue that 'til your teeth fall out. Please DO NOT try to defend what you heard at 1k. You did hear a differnce!!!! The devices where not calibrated and set up to make an objective test. That is the difference. The problem with six pages of this nonsense, is the mixing of subjective and objective perseption. I promise the results will be fewer words than this post. Steve |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Waves "Maserati Signature" and "CLA Classic Compressors" | lowlights | Buy & Sell | 2 | 08-12-2013 09:36 AM |
"Unable to locate digidesign hardware" Mbox (original) ProTools LE 7.4.2 Mac OS X | sharpd | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 23 | 04-27-2012 12:11 AM |
LE 8 install with Original Mbox: "Additional Files": Factory Bundle Installers | amusos | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 0 | 08-17-2011 07:53 PM |
New 27" imac / "original" mbox - need some clear advice.please help !! | santococo | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 4 | 05-21-2010 10:30 AM |
Switching a HD from "transfer only" to "record mode" | BretFarewell | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 6 | 02-16-2010 12:49 PM |