Spanner vs PT

[vudoo]

Anyone here using Spanner ? Pros and cons vs PT's panner ?

[mgoorevich]

Originally Posted by vudoo

Anyone here using Spanner ? Pros and cons vs PT's panner ?

Spanner is much much more than just a panner. When it goes to surround mixing, I'm spoiled enough to say I can't work without the Spanner. It also provide a down mixing ability and supports AS too. Ah...and a free iPad app allowing to control Spanner via Airport is a huge bonus as well.
Try it...get the demo.

[Meads]

The possibility of volume automation for each individual channel on a multichannel track alone is worth buying it, imho. (Actually that should be a PT feature...)

As mgoorevich said it's not just a panner, it is so much more and I use it all the time.

[tamasdragon]

No more surround session without Spanner. Really. Easier to use and much more versatile than the built-in panner, and paired with its iPad app, it's really unbeatable.

[smurfyou]

Spanner is incredibily useful. If you're mixing multichannel formats I can't think of a reason not to have it. Wish there was a Fairlight version!

[Brandonx1]

Originally Posted by smurfyou

Spanner is incredibily useful. If you're mixing multichannel formats I can't think of a reason not to have it. Wish there was a Fairlight version!

Because it's osx only

[Steven1145]

Come on, the stock PT panner is dire. Spanner is miles above it.