|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: I think I can use my old blue 192 I/O’s
^^ not a problem if 3rd party conversion is faster than Avid's because you can always add delay internally. Problem is if 3rd party conversion is slower than Avid's because latency compensation will be screwed.
Avid needs to find a way for 3rd party boxes to introduce themselves and then create unique digilink profiles for them. That is currently missing.
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think I can use my old blue 192 I/O’s
Quote:
Also, I don't expect Avid to get around to creating any 3rd party latency compensation (unique digilink profiles ) because they're behind on development of newer HDX... but they did release a silly card carrier chassis and an MTRX Studio interface that there's no input/output specification like on all other interfaces. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think I can use my old blue 192 I/O’s
Quote:
I'm talking about the check boxes for "compensate for input / output delays after record pass" [or something to that effect]. I actually don't even know where the check boxes are in the version I'm using right now, because I'm just editing and mastering on a laptop with headphones]. I think they only show up when you have [AVID?] interfaces plugged in. Anyhow, I don't think you can achieve that reasonably, or at all, by adding delay internally. Its not the same thing. What it does is print the audio from the jump taking into account precisely the delays engendered by the AD and DA converters. And it really only works right with the AVID or Digi hardware. Like it or not, it effectively ends pretty much all argument against using the AVID or Digi converters, although Aurora always claimed to have cracked it with their Lynx boxes, IIRC [and they may well have]. Best, mightyduck
__________________
MD |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think I can use my old blue 192 I/O’s
Its in the manual, IIRC. Its also talked about in a bunch of threads here and elsewhere. I remember finding out about this and bringing it up in forums and pissing everyone off a long time ago, esp. because it was really fashionable to be using third party [Apogee] interfaces at the time. I saw an official AVID bug fix "vote" referenced in one other thread. Don't know where they got to with the request.
EDIT: Its on page 59 of the Manual. Best, mightyduck
__________________
MD Last edited by mightyduck; 02-24-2020 at 05:19 AM. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think I can use my old blue 192 I/O’s
I'll check manual.........don't see it posted on site.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think I can use my old blue 192 I/O’s
Its definitely there. I just saw it. Don't have the page number handy now, but just search for "after record pass".
mightyduck
__________________
MD |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Blue Cat's PatchWork Updated to v1.62, with brand new Light Blue UI Theme | bluecataudio | AAX Plug-ins | 5 | 01-10-2015 12:41 AM |
How do you know if you have a Green, Blue or non Green or Blue Drive | [email protected] | Pro Tools 10 | 14 | 12-25-2013 12:13 AM |
Sync-blue and midi-blue with protools 11? | John Becool | Pro Tools 11 | 4 | 09-11-2013 10:28 AM |
Blue 192? | woof | Pro Tools 11 | 1 | 06-26-2013 08:03 AM |
Blue 192 IO's | Soundtrack2life | Pro Tools 10 | 15 | 10-22-2011 09:28 AM |