|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Questions for PT8 early adopters.
-Does the "preserve fades while editing" work now or does it make more sense now? Or is it still the same?
-Have they fixed the beachball-problem with large region-groups? -Have they improved the sluggishness with MXF audio-media? -Are the "field recorder features" any better now? Especially the "expand tracks" function? Or does it still create millions of tracks that sometimes even exceed PT 256 track maximum wich usually ends with a crash? -Have thy fixed the "automation doesn´t follow when nudging/trimming regions"-issue? -Have they fixed the "remove selected" issue that always leaves unused behind? -Do you you still get huge page-outs in memory-usage when working with MXF audio or you´ve opened a couple of OMFs in a row? -Does PT8 work with Soundminer? -Is there some kind of "do not create media larger than 2GB" preference to avoid consolidating when doing a transfer back to AVID or PT7.x and lower? -Does PT8 import world-standard poly BWAVs with SMPTE track-layout now or are they still recognized as unreadable? Thanks, Frank. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Questions for PT8 early adopters.
Also:
Does PT8 still create those stray fade-files folders all around? frank. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Questions for PT8 early adopters.
Hi all
the fade files problem seems to be working okay, now quite sure what 'preserve fades while editing' problem you mean? Never had a problem with it, it works okay for me Pete |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Questions for PT8 early adopters.
Quote:
http://duc.digidesign.com/showthread...preserve+fades |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Questions for PT8 early adopters.
Hi Frank
never really thought that was a fault, seems quite logical really and hasn't bothered me. But I can understand why you dislike it. Also thinking about it, the only time I've ever had stray fade folders is when switching discs and not setting the disk allocation correctly, is this what mean? Kind Regards Pete |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Questions for PT8 early adopters.
Hi Frank
On my PT8 LE Testing station the fade problem still exist. When moving a region before or after a crossfade the fade will be splitted into a fade in and out. I think digidesign does not see a problem here. But for many of us its annoying Ale
__________________
2 PT HD Ultimate 2023.12 6/12-Core Westmere/ 48/96 GB / OS 10.14.6 / 96 I/O / 192 I/O / Omni / BM Intensity Pro (Driver 11.4.1) 1x PT 2023.12 Rosetta / MacMini M1 / 16 GB / monterey / SSL2+ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Questions for PT8 early adopters.
It does import (PT8 LE), but it nevertheless gave the Film/PT names to the mono files (so I got the .C suffix instead of .R etc). Maybe there's a setting somewhere in prefs for this, but I haven't checked.
__________________
Danijel Milosevic |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Questions for PT8 early adopters.
That´s too bad but thanks for the info. In an earlier thread a Digi rep already stated that it doesn´t really make sense to him either so there is hope
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
attention pt10 early adopters...is it better than 9 on W7? | tonepad | Windows | 23 | 11-16-2011 09:35 PM |
PTHD 10: Early Adopters. Any 9000 Error Issues? | aboriginal | Windows | 2 | 11-03-2011 04:51 AM |
Too early for PTLE and Mac Pro ? | bobichou | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 10-24-2006 07:11 AM |
Free Plugins-For LATE adopters!! | klaatu | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 13 | 03-14-2003 03:42 AM |
PT 6.0 Early Adopters - Happy? | Markk | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 29 | 03-11-2003 11:30 AM |