|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Digi-004?
Hey guys,
I have a quick question. Basically is there anything in the works for a newer upgrade from the Digi-003? Like a 004? Or something to bridge the gap and improve on equipment? I own an 002 factory and am thinking of upgrading but dont want to buy a 1-2 year old platform if they are coming out with somehting new soon...
__________________
MacPro 2.8 (8X) OS...10.5.6 (Mac) Windows 7 Ultimate 10GB Ram 640GB(Mac) 640GB(Windows 7) 1TB(Audio Drive) Digi-002 Factory and M-box LE 8.0.3 (Mac) 8.0.3 (PC) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digi-004?
It probably won't be called "004" since 4 signifies "death" in Chinese superstition. The "168" would be the right model number for the Asian market.
They are purportedly working on something though. For now, the M-Audio Profire 2626 is easily the best native pro tools interface, hampered as it is by digi's refusing to let it use all 26i/o with pro tools and refusing to enable the Complete Extortion Toolkit for Pro Tools dis-M-powered. It's the only thing I can use for tracking ensembles though due to its low latency cue mixer. If you want the control surface the 003 is clearly superior to the 002 but not dramatically. The C|24 is ghastly overpriced. The Command 8 is no better than your 002 console. They won't let you use an Icon with native. Everything 3rd party is crippled to the old HUI protocol illegally.
__________________
`My name is Pro Tools HD, King of Kings: Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!' Nothing beside remains. Round the decay Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare, The lone and native DAWs stretch far away. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digi-004?
That's OK. They can call it the 004. Chinese superstition? hahahahaha
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Digi-004?
That is by far the funniest thing I've ever read on these boards.
I'd love to hear your comments on a PFLB. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digi-004?
The exciting thing about the PFLB is if you can get your hands on a copy of Pro Tools re-M-powered 7.3cs1. In this release the cripple code limiting the i/o count mysteriously vanished, and you can use the full 32 or 36 or whatever it is i/o of the PFLB in and out of Pro Tools directly. The cripple code was put back in for 7.4 of course.
It's not so much of a win since if you just need that much i/o to track or mix analog you can work in Logic or even Garageband instead. The PFLB does not have the major improvements in the 2626: no DSP low latency cue mixer (they got firewire as fast as Pro Tools HD, believe it or not), no new OS drivers, and I don't think the PFLB has the JetPLL jitter elimination either. The converters on the 2626 may be the best in the entire ^V|>/Digi family at this point. For cheap. Generally stuff like taking out the cripple code for a cs release is done secretly as an "easter egg" by a programmer who considers himself too valuable to be fired for it. The funniest thing I've read on this board was DigiTechSuppt writing that 7.3cs1's enabling twice as much i/o as normal was "a bug."
__________________
`My name is Pro Tools HD, King of Kings: Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!' Nothing beside remains. Round the decay Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare, The lone and native DAWs stretch far away. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Digi-004?
Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Digi-004?
Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digi-004?
Actually it is Chinese (and maybe Japanese too). The way the number four is pronounced is very similar to the way the word "death" is pronounced in Chinese, hence the correlation between the two words and subsequent superstitions. This is very evident in Cantonese and somewhat in Mandarin. Many Japanese words are descended or derived from Chinese words, therefore the similarities. Hey, we get a little asian history lesson on the DUC.
__________________
Obsidian Dragon
MacbookPro14,3 - Intel Core i7 3.1 GHz, 16 GB MacOS 13.6.6 running Protools 2024.3.1 Mac Studio M1Max - 64GB MacOS 14.4.1 running Protools 2024.3.1 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digi-004?
Digi 004. Hmmm...
What I got though is the 003 Rack Factory+ and a Mackie Control Universal. Works fine with me. I can use the MCU with PT8 (via HUI) and with my other apps like Sonar7. As of now, the 003 Rack Factory+ is the newest from Digidesign (for PTLE). Digi 004 (or whatever they wanna call it) maybe will be out in 2 years plus IMO. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digi-004?
Would the converters in the Profire 610 M-Audio device be on the same scale as the 2626? -thx
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Digi 002 not recognized by MacBook Pro - Digi CoreAudio not working | GuidoC | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 4 | 08-04-2011 09:37 AM |
Digi hardware - bizarre behavior - Digi you will lose this market share | andre67 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 27 | 02-26-2010 07:45 PM |
Digi TS: Problem w/current Digi Core Audio Manager | Armando | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 4 | 10-11-2006 10:08 AM |
Digi - Reinstalled OS, PT LE, can't reauthorize Digi 002 pack plugins | OneMadSon | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 03-04-2003 04:20 PM |
Wha is the name of the digi cable to hook up Apogee digi 8+ card called??? | leon777 | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 4 | 04-15-2002 02:44 PM |