|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Vocal Tracking
Hey guys, I'm back again with more questions in hope of some answers :)
I'm tracking vocals, and I'm not sure which way is the most efficient in the mix. Everything else is finished, (guitar, bass, drums etc.) and I want the mix to be perfect! Is Antares Auto-Tune efx worth the purchase? Any help would be awesomely appreciated!! -Justin
__________________
Mac Mini OS X 10.8.5 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7 16 GB 1600 MHz DDR3 Pro Tools 10, 003 Rack, NI Maschine www.youtube.com/firsty33 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vocal Tracking
some more info would be useful.
what do you mean by 'efficient'. and auto tune is only good if you have a problem to fix...if you get the vocals bang on in the first instance then everything is much easier! the most important thing is to capture a full sound to begin with, and this means mic placement. no amount of autotune, E.Q, compression, whatever fancy plug-in is the latest, is going to fix a weak crumbly recording. So before you invest in Autotune, be sure to master the most effective, and cheapest technique - where it place the microphone. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vocal Tracking | firsty33 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 13 | 11-19-2010 11:09 AM |
Vocal Tracking? | Bluetide | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 6 | 11-30-2003 07:30 AM |
vocal tracking with art mpa pro | jdavis74 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 04-30-2003 02:21 PM |
chorus n vocal tracking | phanatik | Tips & Tricks | 6 | 03-06-2003 09:39 PM |
vocal tracking | SNAPPER | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 10-16-2000 09:52 AM |