|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pro Tools 10 vs 12 Stability
Has anyone else noticed that Pro Tools 12 (and 11) is way less stable with lower buffer settings than in version 10?
I can run Pro Tools HD Native v10 @ 32 samples with 150+ tracks and plugins with no drama but I need at least 256 samples for the same sessions in either v11 or v12. Is anyone else experiencing this? I'm currently using 10 for tracking and editing and then 12 for mixing. 10 is way more responsive when it comes to editing, i.e. beat detective, whereas 12 is sluggish. On the flip side 12 is rock solid for mixing and I can run 50% more plugins than I can in 10.
__________________
www.decimalstudios.co.uk Mac Pro 8 Core Mid-2010 OSX 10.10.5 (RAID-0 SSD's) HD Native PCIe Card Apogee Symphony IO Pro Tools HD 12.5.2 UAD-2 Quad PCIe Last edited by Chris Coulter; 12-17-2015 at 02:16 AM. Reason: Addition |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Pro Tools 10 vs 12 Stability
I never ran HDN on v10....but yes...my buffer struggles to run at 128.
and this with no VI's.......no so big a session 30 or so tracks....working on the finishing touches.....maybe a few more overdubs....but i would like to see it at 64 consistently....44.1k at the moment. I have just disabled Hyper Threading due to another probably unrelated issue.........so I don't know if that will affect the buffer size or not.....
__________________
Daniel HDX - PT12.5.1 - HD I/O 16x8x8 Win10-Pro (v1709)- 6 Core i7-6850k - ASUS X99 Deluxe ii D-Command Main Unit - 'Ole Blue http://www.sknoteaudio.com/ plugins rock and are affordable. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools 10 vs 12 Stability
Quote:
Try installing 10 and see the difference for yourself!
__________________
www.decimalstudios.co.uk Mac Pro 8 Core Mid-2010 OSX 10.10.5 (RAID-0 SSD's) HD Native PCIe Card Apogee Symphony IO Pro Tools HD 12.5.2 UAD-2 Quad PCIe |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools 10 vs 12 Stability
same here - can't get the buffer down as low for tracking with out errors - never had issue on PT 10 with one processor dedicated to the OS. I've just reinstalled PT 10 on Yosemite using a workaround free/ shareware OSX app called 'Pacifist' to extract the installer contents and copy over manually- works fine after smoothing out a few kinks!
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools 10 vs 12 Stability
the menus were all messed up when i tried PT10 and yosemite .. hope you are having better luck ..
Quote:
__________________
Macmini M1 8/512 -OS 12.3.1 and PT2022.4 Logic Pro X 10.7.4 RME BabyFace Pro Macbook Pro july 2014 2.5ghz 16gb ram 512gb SSD - OS11.6.5 - PT 2021.3 Logic Pro X 10.7.4 RME BabyFace Pro |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Pro Tools 10 vs 12 Stability
I find similar here on a Windows-based HDN setup. PT10 and 11 are really solid, but 12 sucks wind(and I try every .x update too) Too bad as the new features are things I really want to use
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works The better I drink, the more I mix BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools 10 vs 12 Stability
This subject always drives me crazy when I get into discussions about latency in HDN is still a problem.
Some folks around here including a couple of moderators say they never have latency issues with HDN. As you can see by my signature I'm still TDM. I bought a used HDN card a while back and tried it with 11 and had latency issues when doing overdubs through plugins and sends on my typical sessions. No way I was going to use LLM, why when I have TDM where it's a non issue? For me, there is simply no compelling reasons, considering the limitations described in this thread to leave TDM for HDN.
__________________
HD Native Pcie, PTHD 11, PT12 Vanilla, Omni, Lynx Aurora 16, 192 I/O (16 in/8 out), 24 Fader D-Command, lots of preamps and compressors. MacPro 5.1 (12) Core (2009 MacPro 8 Core Upgraded to a 12 Core MacPro), 56 Gig Ram, SSD System & 3 - 2TB Drives, OSX 10.9.5, Windows 10 Via Bootcamp |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools 10 vs 12 Stability
Same issue here with the native version of PT11/12. I tried it on my kids computer to see, not useable for me.
__________________
HD Native Pcie, PTHD 11, PT12 Vanilla, Omni, Lynx Aurora 16, 192 I/O (16 in/8 out), 24 Fader D-Command, lots of preamps and compressors. MacPro 5.1 (12) Core (2009 MacPro 8 Core Upgraded to a 12 Core MacPro), 56 Gig Ram, SSD System & 3 - 2TB Drives, OSX 10.9.5, Windows 10 Via Bootcamp |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools 10 vs 12 Stability
Quote:
You're having issues with the menus in PT11/12 in Yosemite? Shouldn't happen. I do remember when I tried PT11.3.1 in Yosemite it was never stable enough for serious work. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pro Tools 10 vs 12 Stability
yea - same here - installed menu's messed up!!
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pro Tools 11 HDX Stability, Usability & Performance Increase from a Plug-In Focus | treason | AAX Plug-ins | 16 | 12-17-2014 08:27 AM |
Pro Tools LE stability for live recording | digidesigner | VENUE Live Sound Systems | 3 | 06-11-2010 02:48 PM |
Stability when tracking in Pro Tools 8 LE | earthcorp | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 5 | 03-29-2010 02:11 PM |
Pro Tools LE 7.3.1 Stability Issues... | Randy Quaylude | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 5 | 08-10-2009 12:43 PM |
Stability of Pro Tools LE 6.1.1 | Rey Mo | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 4 | 10-07-2003 05:57 PM |