|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo
There are two versions, according to this page.
https://avid.secure.force.com/pkb/ar...n-Requirements Model Serial Prefix Compatible Pro Tools Versions Pro Tools | Carbon ENENG Pro Tools Ultimate 2020.11 (or later) Pro Tools | Carbon ENESI Pro Tools | Ultimate 2021.10 (or later) Pro Tools | Carbon Pre ENERS Pro Tools Studio, Ultimate 2022.10 (or later) but what the differences are is not clear. Something substantial enough to mean different versions of firmware are needed though... Dominic
__________________
MacBookPro M1Max 16" 10/32 64GB 2TB, Ventura 13.6.6, Pro Tools 2023.12.1, Carbon. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo
Since the custom "AVB" is implemented by the Pro Tools software for the Carbon, guessing that's a NIC chip in the hardware compatibility issue (ie, the SI model needs 2021.10 to talk to the newer part used.)
The divide would have happened in 2021 anyway and this is the press release from Nov 2020 (so from the beginning):
__________________
Pro Tools Ult 2024.3.1, HDX 2, MTRX/SPQ, RME BBF Pro + MADIface Pro • S1 x 2, Fire Max11 x 2, Dock, iPad Air5 • Mac Mini 14,12, 12 core, macOS 13.6.6 • RAM 32GB, SSD 4TB, GPU 19 core • QNAP TVS-872XT 148TB TB3 |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo
Personally not happy with Alto Music, I bought a unit described as new, but it had obviously been opened with some of the packaging missing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Edward |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo
Quote:
I once had a piece of gear ship with an extra Ultimate license and they said keep it (which, quite frankly, when I sold it, covered the cost of the actual gear.) I think there's a major disconnect between their sales dept and their shipping manager. But they've always come out on the side of the buyer.
__________________
Pro Tools Ult 2024.3.1, HDX 2, MTRX/SPQ, RME BBF Pro + MADIface Pro • S1 x 2, Fire Max11 x 2, Dock, iPad Air5 • Mac Mini 14,12, 12 core, macOS 13.6.6 • RAM 32GB, SSD 4TB, GPU 19 core • QNAP TVS-872XT 148TB TB3 |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo
Quote:
On my Carbon, I got more money off because it was a repack. It came in at $1750 or so with taxes, etc. I would call them up.
__________________
Apple M1 Mac Studio (base model) ProTools Carbon w/SSL XLogic MADI-AX Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/sparkletune/ |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Carbon vs Apollo
Considering this Alto deal for $1999 for one of our sound design/edit rooms. The listing on Alto now states it as a refurbished unit. Contacting them via text, they state the same thing about these being early versions with only 24 bit converters. Does anybody know if there is an appreciable difference in sound between the 24 bit and 32 bit versions? Is it just a headroom difference?
__________________
Scott Gatteño |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Apollo Twin MKII Quad, Apollo 16 MKII, UA 2-610, Studio Desk | trackone | Buy & Sell | 0 | 02-14-2023 09:02 AM |
use Carbon and Carbon Pre together as one interface in Logic/Cubase ? | pm mastering studio | Pro Tools | Carbon | 0 | 12-22-2022 01:54 AM |
Any Carbon users who were using UAD Apollo before? | Oblivion777 | Pro Tools | Carbon | 72 | 04-03-2021 03:51 PM |
Apollo 8Pre or Apollo 8 QUAD? | Kerochan | Third Party Interfaces | 1 | 11-27-2017 11:08 AM |