Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > General Discussion & Off Topic > General Discussion
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-21-2001, 03:43 PM
PDupre PDupre is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cohasset, MA 02025
Posts: 384
Default What alternatives to 888/24 are you using?

A post on another thread by John Caldwell brought up DAC options that were new to me. What DACs/clocks/etc are you using, how are they interfaced, how much do they cost, and most importantly, how do they sound.

Thanks in advance.

PS I know - you love your DA8000SE
__________________
www.peterdupre.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-22-2001, 08:15 AM
CLanger CLanger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Saint Paul, MN USA
Posts: 225
Default Re: What alternatives to 888/24 are you using?

An important reason to use the 888 is that it offers Superclock in. If you are syncing PT to anything, this is invaluable. I've tried every way possible to sync PT to analog decks, other computers, sequencers, et cetera, and this is the most rock solid way to do it. If you go with another DAC, make sure you have a way to get Superclock into your Pt rig.

------------------
Chris
chris@castle-productio
ns.com
__________________
Chris
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-22-2001, 09:39 AM
uno1234 uno1234 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,459
Default Re: What alternatives to 888/24 are you using?

A USD is an essential part of any protools system. No other sync device provides better ProTools integration and flexibility.

And the USD, BTW, has superclock in.

On topic however, I know alot of people are using the RME converters with an ADAT Bridge and love it. But that's just what I've heard from these boards. Do a search on "RME" or "Apogee" and you are sure to find alot of info.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-22-2001, 10:02 AM
Mount Royal Mount Royal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 995
Default Re: What alternatives to 888/24 are you using?

Those not syncing via SMPTE don't need a USD, do they? Does anyone claim that the USD offers a sonically superior work clock source? Lastly, does Superclock convey any sonic benefitin its own right?

My understanding is that those operating a Pro Tools as a stand-alone audio and MIDI recording system could get along without Superclock. What do you think, Clanger and UNO123?

John Caldwell
__________________
Pro Tools 2018.4
HDX, 192 and Lucid I/O
5,1 MacPro 12 Core; OSX 10.12.6
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-23-2001, 12:59 AM
666 666 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 267
Default Re: What alternatives to 888/24 are you using?

As i mostly need to record only 2 tracks at a time, i have a Rosetta (sounds better than AD8000!!!) connected to a 882/20. So i have 2 top inputs, 6 "service" inputs and 8 good outputs, 2 for stereo and 6 for surround monitoring.
Cost effective and SUPER quality recording, perfect clock.

------------------
somewhere in the planet
__________________
somewhere on the planet
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-23-2001, 02:12 PM
CLanger CLanger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Saint Paul, MN USA
Posts: 225
Default Re: What alternatives to 888/24 are you using?

If you are using PT to sync to MIDI gear, no, you don't necessarily need Superclock.

For those of us who must sync PT to timecode at some point, Superclock provides the best way because it carries clock reference AND position reference. SMPTE itself, as well as MTC, only carry position reference. It tells the machines slaved to it where to be when, but not how fast to travel between those points. I know, you are thinking that SMPTE and MTC resolve to up to 30 FPS, and therefore the amount of slop is only 1/30th of a second...big deal, right? Well, it is a big deal, because if PT gets off enough because it isn't receiving a clock source as well, it will run at its own speed, as will your analog deck, or MDMs. The result is a sonically noticeable loss of accurate sync after about three minutes.

No audio is passed through Superclock, but the fact that it offers the most stable form of sync, through clock source and positional reference, allows your audio to remain as in sync (pun intended) as much as is possible, thereby eliminating phase shift and timing errors between the two (or more) systems being synced.

I hope this all makes sense.

------------------
Chris
chris@castle-productio
ns.com
__________________
Chris
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-23-2001, 02:24 PM
Mount Royal Mount Royal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 995
Default Re: What alternatives to 888/24 are you using?

You do make sense, Chris. You've educated me along this line; thanks.

John Caldwell
__________________
Pro Tools 2018.4
HDX, 192 and Lucid I/O
5,1 MacPro 12 Core; OSX 10.12.6
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-27-2001, 08:36 AM
tobymusic tobymusic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Duesseldorf, Germany
Posts: 6
Default Re: What alternatives to 888/24 are you using?

Chris,

I don´t agree . Superclock does not carry any time reference. Superclock is a simple wordclock at 256x speed.
When slaving to an incoming LTC the SSD and USD derive an interpolated time reference from the TC. This is converted to MIDI time code (MTC) and passed to your host computer and to Superclock. There are, however, devices that provide the same for less money, like the Rosendahl or the WIF. Those let you switch between Superclock and Wordclock.

toby
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-27-2001, 09:39 AM
CLanger CLanger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Saint Paul, MN USA
Posts: 225
Default Re: What alternatives to 888/24 are you using?

I apologize. Superclock carries ONLY clock, not position. Position is carried by LTC. However, my basic statement still holds true. That is: in order to get true sync you need BOTH a time reference (Superclock) and a position reference (LTC). Hope this clears things up.

------------------
Chris
chris@castle-productio
ns.com
__________________
Chris
[email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-27-2001, 10:12 AM
PDupre PDupre is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cohasset, MA 02025
Posts: 384
Default Re: What alternatives to 888/24 are you using?

Sooo...Let me get this straight. The concensus is to have at least 1 888/24?
__________________
www.peterdupre.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any alternatives to D-Fi? Dopamine Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 3 05-23-2008 11:22 PM
TDM-like alternatives? Muxlow 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 3 04-04-2004 02:35 PM
Alternatives? goka Digidesign Hardware & Software 0 11-18-2002 12:58 AM
Alternatives Devin 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 0 06-25-2002 07:59 AM
Alternatives to 888 spookyvoodoo Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 7 08-30-2000 03:31 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:27 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com