Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools 9

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-23-2011, 11:51 PM
uptowners2010 uptowners2010 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 12
Default Recording audio vs virtual instruments

i have a question about recording audio vs working with midi and virtual instruments. ok so the they say that 24 bit is better then 16 bit and that is very true. but what i am wondering is how would the audio quality of a recording be if you just work with midi and virtual instruments at 16 bit. would the audio quality make that much of a difference if you record internally then working with audio. i know that recording instruments with audio at 24bit is amazing at 24 bit over 16 bit. but what about recording midi/virtual instruments internally through my mbox or something.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-24-2011, 02:25 AM
zedhed's Avatar
zedhed zedhed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 3,944
Default Re: Recording audio vs virtual instruments

Your Bit rate is chosen when creating a session. So Audio & VI's done within that session will be processed at the Bit rate chosen. Bare in mind, Virtual Instruments are using Audio Samples to produce sound.

There are two things you should be concerned about when creating your audio files; those are sampling rate and bit rate.

Sampling rate represents the sound frequency range. The higher sampling rate the file is, the wider the frequency range is. In other words, higher is better quality. Your lows will be lower, your highs will be higher. Lower rates can dampen the highs and lows so that audio quality is lower. You won't notice that much on a cheap set of headphones, but on high quality ones you'll notice a huge difference.

Bit rate defines how many "bits" of space the file takes per second of audio. Obviously the higher the bit rate, the higher quality audio you'll have.

So for best quality, you want high sampling rates and high bit rates. Sampling rates do not affect file size as much as bit rates do, so if space is at a premium (like on an expansion card) a good tradeoff is to create high sampling rate files with a lower bit rate, or use a variable bit rate (VBR) with a moderately high "base" setting, like 128kbps.
__________________
Too much blood in my drugstream

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z690 AERO D
CPU: Intel Alder Lake Core i9-12900K
CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15S
RAM: Corsair Vengeance DDR5 64GB (2x 32gb 5200MHz)
Drives: 2 x Samsung 980 Pro 2TB NVME PCIE 4.0 M.2 SSD (Record & Samples)
1 x Samsung 980 Pro 1TB NVME PCIE 4.0 M.2 SSD (OS Win 11 Pro)

GPU:Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060 12GB GDDR6 PCIE 4
PSU: Corsair HX Series HX850 Platinim
CASE: Fractal Define XL R2
PT 2024.6 Omni s/pdif <> AxeFxIII
HD 96I/O
Adam A8H Monitors
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-24-2011, 07:38 AM
musicman691 musicman691 is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Sopranos State (NJ)
Posts: 19,161
Default Re: Recording audio vs virtual instruments

There is no such term as bit rate; properly it is called bit depth. The higher the bit depth the bigger the dynamic range (signal level).

The reason a higher sample rate gives 'better' sound is the extension on the high end of the frequency spectrum so you get more overtones. You may not hear them due to age and hearing problems, but if they weren't there you'd notice a very dull sound.

Back on topic: as to virtual instruments a lot is going to depend on whether the vi is resident on the same computer you're doing recording on or not. If the vi is on the same computer you have to see if it has options to change the bit depth and sample rate - not all do. If the vi in question is a sampler or sample player then your bit depth is dependent on the bit depth of the sample set. Some vi's give you the option to use a 16 bit or 24 bit sample set - this depends on what is installed on your computer. Companies do this because they recognize not everyone has large hard disk drives to hold the large sample sets.

And the audio I/O doesn't matter until you render the MIDI track into audio. Until then you're not actually recording anything through your mBox (the MIDI string is digital).
__________________
Jack
See profile for system details
iMac dead & retired as of 11/4/17

QAPLA!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-24-2011, 07:41 AM
daeron80 daeron80 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orlando, Florida, USA
Posts: 4,134
Default Re: Recording audio vs virtual instruments

The internal audio path in PT9 is 32-bit float. The output of VIs will be converted to that bit depth regardless of the session settings. As long as you keep them virtual all the way to mix down, the session bit depth will make no difference to their sound. However, if at some point you print a VI (record it to an audio track), that 32-bit float signal will get converted to the session bit depth in order to write the file to disk. In that case, a 24-bit session will yield superior resolution. If you're only using VIs, the computer won't use any more resources for a 24-bit session than a 16-bit one, and if you record anything to audio, 24-bit will be better. So, why not?
__________________
David J. Finnamore

PT 2024.10.1 Ultimate | Clarett+ 8Pre | macOS 14.6.1 on a MacBook Pro M1 Max
PT 2024.10.1 | Saffire Pro 40 | Win10 latest, HP Z440 64GB
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-24-2011, 05:28 PM
zedhed's Avatar
zedhed zedhed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 3,944
Default Re: Recording audio vs virtual instruments

Bit Rate/Bit Depth

Tom_ate_oes/Tom_ar_toes

Depends what part of the world you come from
__________________
Too much blood in my drugstream

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z690 AERO D
CPU: Intel Alder Lake Core i9-12900K
CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-D15S
RAM: Corsair Vengeance DDR5 64GB (2x 32gb 5200MHz)
Drives: 2 x Samsung 980 Pro 2TB NVME PCIE 4.0 M.2 SSD (Record & Samples)
1 x Samsung 980 Pro 1TB NVME PCIE 4.0 M.2 SSD (OS Win 11 Pro)

GPU:Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3060 12GB GDDR6 PCIE 4
PSU: Corsair HX Series HX850 Platinim
CASE: Fractal Define XL R2
PT 2024.6 Omni s/pdif <> AxeFxIII
HD 96I/O
Adam A8H Monitors
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-24-2011, 06:09 PM
Craig F Craig F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,606
Default Re: Recording audio vs virtual instruments

Quote:
Originally Posted by zedhed View Post
Bit Rate/Bit Depth

Tom_ate_oes/Tom_ar_toes

Depends what part of the world you come from
no,
Bit Rate involves a time component
Bit Depth is the size of the bit word

a 24 bit word at sample frequency of 48kHz has a bit rate of 1,152,000 bits per second
__________________
...

"Fly High Freeee click psst tic tic tic click Bird Yeah!" - dave911


Thank you,

Craig
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-24-2011, 06:28 PM
ThunderKyss ThunderKyss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 168
Default Re: Recording audio vs virtual instruments

Even though VIs have been out for a while now, I think that frontier is still wide open.

Questions like these shouldn't need to be asked. You have the gear, try it out. See what it do. If you like, then go with it. If not, stop wasting your time.

Interesting question though.

Ω
__________________
MacMini OS x 10.14.6
Core i5 2.5 GHz 16GB
Eleven Rack
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PT11 audio dropouts when recording BFD3 and other virtual instruments yeloop Pro Tools 11 3 12-24-2013 05:45 PM
Virtual Instruments Recording Volume risey Getting Started 3 04-25-2013 10:05 AM
Recording Virtual Instruments - Boom scottee Windows 1 05-25-2012 06:44 AM
simultaneous recording of virtual instruments muscmp 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 6 06-10-2010 06:25 AM
virtual instruments not recording in Pro tools 8 indiesync 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 1 06-09-2010 11:26 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:11 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com