|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Digitally insert waves MaxxBCL
Has anyone used the outboard Waves MaxxBCL unit?
How have you inserted it? I would like to insert it on the L/R using AES to avoid the extra AD conversion. Is an external clock required to insert it digitally? Any info here is appreciated. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digitally insert waves MaxxBCL
I have used the hardware, but not digitally. If Venue is the master clock, then there is nothing to worry about. Are you connecting anything else digitally?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digitally insert waves MaxxBCL
The MaxxBCL would be the only digital piece of outboard.
Will I have to run word clock BNC from the FOH rack to the Maxx, or is that handled through AES? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digitally insert waves MaxxBCL
Nah, it will clock it AES or however you're connecting it.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digitally insert waves MaxxBCL
Thanks Brad.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digitally insert waves MaxxBCL
But before you make the purchase....do you have the Aphex 250 Big Bottom plugin? If not, try it out----I use that myself, it's VERY good!!
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digitally insert waves MaxxBCL
Is MaxxBCL faster than having the same plugs as TDM on a master bus?
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Digitally insert waves MaxxBCL
Hi,
Quote:
For a digital insert involving an external device the total latency will be the processing delay of the algorithm, plus the latency involved in making the digital connection. AES inputs on digital devices often feature sample rate conversion (SRC), which allows two digital devices to be connected together without needing a common clock (and is even needed when connecting two devices at the same sample rate). SRC adds some amount of delay or latency, usually a function of sample rate. For example, the sample rate converters used on the AES inputs of FOH Rack impart 84 samples of delay at 48 kHz, for a total of 1.75 milliseconds. The inserted device may also have a similar amount of latency due to its SRC. Adding all these latencies together the total latency connecting a digital outboard device will likely be much more than an internal plug-in. [UPDATE] Latency spec, in samples, from the Maxx BCL manual... Digital to Digital: 133 @44.1, 48K sampling rates [COMMENT] 133 samples at 48 kHz is 2.77 milliseconds, so the round trip latency will be at least (2.77 Maxx BCL + 1.75 FOH Rack AES input = 4.52 ms), plus a few more microseconds for routing to/from the insert point. Sheldon Last edited by Sheldon Radford; 07-21-2009 at 09:37 PM. Reason: Added actual latency numbers |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digitally insert waves MaxxBCL
Like I said---let me recommend the Aphex Big Bottom plugin!
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digitally insert waves MaxxBCL
Quote:
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Waves Bundle and Pro Tools - Insert to Audio Track problem | arb232 | Virtual Instruments | 1 | 04-22-2011 01:18 AM |
Waves TDM plugins not in insert menu? | Samuel Axelsson | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 7 | 04-24-2010 02:05 AM |
Waves L2 Only in Audiosuite - Not Insert Plugin?! | yarrick19 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 1 | 01-05-2005 07:30 PM |
Waves 3.2 Plug In's Won't Activate on Insert !!!!! | mu-tron-kid | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 3 | 06-11-2003 02:07 PM |
How to insert time / insert measures, without upsetting tempo map and markers | imp | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 03-25-2003 05:45 PM |