Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2003, 08:40 AM
doubleyouel doubleyouel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 20
Default Latency with Aux Channel

ok here's the deal: if i set up an audio track to record a mic signal there's no latency in the headphones whatsoever. but if i send the mic signal to an aux channel to compress it then to an audio track there's latency in the headphones. keep in mind that i'm using the headphone jack on the 001. how do i fix this?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-01-2003, 09:25 AM
doubleyouel doubleyouel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 20
Default Re: Latency with Aux Channel

ok i just ran a couple tests and it turns out that there is an 8 millisecond delay when recording vocals through an aux channel. is the only way to compress vocals going in while avoiding delay to use an outboard compressor before the mic signal hits the 001?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-01-2003, 10:19 AM
valvebrother valvebrother is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 815
Default Re: Latency with Aux Channel

"is the only way to compress vocals going in while avoiding delay to use an outboard compressor before the mic signal hits the 001?"

Yes, that's the only way.

Even when you send the signal to an aux channel (delay or no delay) you are not "compressing on the way in".

If you do not compress your analog signal before it hits the A/D converter, you are not compressing prior to recording. Anything you do to the signal after the A/D process; be in via an aux channel, an insert or audiosuite, should be considered compressing after recording.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-01-2003, 01:52 PM
doubleyouel doubleyouel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 20
Default Re: Latency with Aux Channel

on the contrary. sending a mic signal to an aux channel with a compressor on it then bussing that signal to a recordable audio track does compress vocals on the way in. the only problem is that there is a delay because of the aux track (8 milliseconds).
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-01-2003, 02:58 PM
TAPKAE TAPKAE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hog Heaven
Posts: 221
Default Re: Latency with Aux Channel

What he was saying is that you are not compressing before conversion to digital, usually the reason for having a compressor inline at all. But maybe you need a sonic stamp on your track? But don't kid yourself. Doing an aux track insert isn't compressing where it will do best-- before the converters.
__________________
OS 10.3.9
1.25 mhz single G4, 1.25GB RAM, Firewire & Internal recording drives, Nomad Factory plugins
PT 6.4, 001, Motormix
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-01-2003, 03:34 PM
doubleyouel doubleyouel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 20
Default Re: Latency with Aux Channel

traditionally, where is the compressor in the recording chain: before or after the mic pre? shouldn't there be some way to compress within pro tools before recording to disk besides this way i am talking about? i have a compressor plug-in, so why should i have to buy an outboard compressor?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-01-2003, 04:00 PM
mentalmusic mentalmusic is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NoHo
Posts: 305
Default Re: Latency with Aux Channel

Traditionally, the compressor comes between your mic pre and your line-level input of your recording medium (in your example, ProTools.)

What everyone is trying to say is that there's no advantage of recording through a plugin compressor over just recording the track and then compressing it during mixdown.

For example:

Let's say that you're recording a Fender Jazz bass and everytime she hits an open F string (she's tuned up a half step [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img] ) the recorded signal digitally clips and you get a red light [img]images/icons/mad.gif[/img] on your meter within ProTools.

You could then add a hardware compressor between the mic pre and the input of your box (001,002,or whatever you're using.) The compressor could then be dialed up to level out the bass guitar so that you could still record just as hot of a signal (which is debatably good or not so good [img]images/icons/rolleyes.gif[/img] , but that's a different topic) without clipping and getting nasty digital distortion. [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

The problem with inserting a plugin compressor (like you described above) is that it is being inserted after the A/D conversion. That means that that the signal has already hit the digital domain and clipped. [img]images/icons/shocked.gif[/img]

No good.

Therefore, not only are you recording with extra latency and locked into a compression setting that you could have probably dialed in better during mixdown, but you are compressing an already clipped signal. [img]images/icons/frown.gif[/img]

Don't worry, I used to do it too! [img]images/icons/cool.gif[/img]
__________________
Digi001 * Pro Tools LE v5.2beta * Mac G4 733Mhz * 1.5gb RAM
40gb internal HD * Lacie 40gb firewire HD * Radeon 7000 dual-display
http://www.erikkarter.batcave.net
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-01-2003, 04:31 PM
doubleyouel doubleyouel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 20
Default Re: Latency with Aux Channel

an interesting and informative post, mentalmusic. my problem is that my mic pre is on my box, so is it possible to run the mic to the compressor THEN to the mic pre on the 001, or does the signal have to be amplified before hitting the compressor?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-01-2003, 04:49 PM
TAPKAE TAPKAE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Hog Heaven
Posts: 221
Default Re: Latency with Aux Channel

A NON preamplified signal is rarely enough to hit a compressor with enough juice to have it do its job. Line level stuff can be put in line with no preamps around, but if you are talking about a mic or DI feed, just bank on it always being a chain of Mic/DI > Pre > Comp > Recorder.

Got it? No more questions on that one, eh? Besides, why would you want to compress a sound before bringing it up to working level?
__________________
OS 10.3.9
1.25 mhz single G4, 1.25GB RAM, Firewire & Internal recording drives, Nomad Factory plugins
PT 6.4, 001, Motormix
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-01-2003, 05:17 PM
doubleyouel doubleyouel is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 20
Default Re: Latency with Aux Channel

i always figured that the dynamic range of vocals is so wide that they HAD to be compressed on the way in. theoretically, the more dynamic the signal, the lower the minimum volume level, which is not the best quality audio information.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strange CoreAudio issue - right channel information getting into left channel -JK- Pro Tools 9 5 01-10-2011 08:42 AM
Delay/Reverb: On the Channel or Bused to an Aux Channel. mbyeates 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 5 12-26-2010 03:55 PM
Multi-channel plugin default 'channel view'? Floydio Tips & Tricks 1 11-26-2010 10:47 AM
Selecting a Channel on Icon does not select channel in ProTools teacherman ICON & C|24 2 06-07-2010 11:59 AM
One 8 channel cable for a 16 channel I-O! Digi what is the deal? microphone General Discussion 7 09-08-2000 03:55 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com