|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Yes to cloud collaboration!
Let's agree to stop this right here. I have already forwarded your question to Avid and I am also very interested to hear the answer.
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yes to cloud collaboration!
Quote:
Thanks for forwarding, Frank.
__________________
PTHDn 2024.3 (OSX13.6.5), 8x8x8, MacPro 14,8, AJA LHi, SYNC HD, all genlocked via AJA GEN10, 64GB RAM, Xilica Neutrino, Meyersound Acheron |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yes to cloud collaboration!
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_through_obscurity |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Yes to cloud collaboration!
You folks seem to have overlooked my post about virtually all of the major broadcast/television networks and post facilities in the world having been using Avid's cloud storage for years. I can assure you their lawyers and technologists made damned sure it was as secure as required before ever placing their first asset there. Avid is by no means some upstart cloud provider that still needs to figure out how to do security. http://www.avid.com/US/products/Interplay-MAM
__________________
Bob's room 615 562-4346 Interview Artists are the gatekeepers of truth! - Paul Robeson |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yes to cloud collaboration!
Hello. One reason I am anxiously awaiting the rollout and the details of Avid's version of cloud collaboration is that it could actually be an ISDN replacement. Source Connect should have been this but it has just never been able to overtake ISDN in the US because of reliability. Audio wise it sounds better without a doubt, but it's just not reliable enough to work the way ISDN does day in and day out in the US.
I know some areas of Europe and Asia have phenomenal internet backbones and have been able to rely on Source Connect. Here in the US this is just simply not the case. Depending on where you are and who your ISP is, you may or may not be able to get a rock solid Source Connect system going. This is not the fault of Source Elements but just unreliable internet. By the way, keep in mind Source Connect needs live audio streaming which is what makes that part of it unreliable. The thing is that ironically also here in the US the companies that provide ISDN service want very much to stop doing it and use those wires for other services. ATT regularly calls the studio I work at trying to get them to stop using their lines or threatens with even higher rates. The problem is there is just nothing else that can be relied on the way ISDN can be relied on. Until now if this works as advertised. Because now we will be able to send and receive files through a peer to peer connection almost instantaneously. Not only that, they will show up in our Pro Tools timeline. Not only that, there is also a Skype like video/text chat tool that accompanies it. If this works as advertised, it could be THE thing to replace ISDN. And that could potentially be huge. For the work I do and people like myself in post, this could be as big as anything else they've rolled out. Fingers crossed.
__________________
froyo |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Yes to cloud collaboration!
Yep, ISDN is guaranteed bandwidth. But get a fibre (SDP) and never worry about it in a lifetime :)
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yes to cloud collaboration!
I installed many ISDN lines for business phone systems and data for years. It can be implemented as a PRI or BRI. The PRI is 24 channels, 23 of which are 64k B channels and the last a D channel which takes care of signaling, call setup, Calling number identification, etc. A BRI (basic rate interface) is 2-64k lines for bearer and one smaller channel for signaling. These, along with simple T-1 were the standard for a long time before packet switched services using TCP-IP, came along. They can be bonded together for video calls, etc. Not that anyone asked for this info, but maybe it will be useful to know later.
It's weird how many of the things we use in the music world started out in the telephony side of things. The "cloud" was just the phone company. We called it that for many many years because once the line left the building we had no way of knowing how it got to the far end. It could be analog copper, digital copper, T-1, T-3, microwave, fiber, or who knows what else. Voice and data started to combine and along came VOIP. Sorry for the rambling, unsolicited response. I started out wanting to make a lame joke about AVID being way ahead of us, and instead of giving us track freeze they would just freeze your whole damn computer. Ba doom boom. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yes to cloud collaboration!
In the U.S. Getting fiber to the home (or business) is in very specific metropolitan markets only. Typical scenario is fiber for the backbone then converted to copper or coax to the customer which is what most of us have but it is all down to how the ISP splits and shares it's bandwidth, and it's typically never in the customers favor!!
__________________
pro-tools-pc.com TRASHER Pro Tools Utility(updated 3-6-18) HD Native, Avid 16x16, Eleven Rack, Focusrite Clarett 8preX, UA Quad Apollo TB. Intel I7 9900k Win 10 |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Yes to cloud collaboration!
Quote:
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Yes to cloud collaboration!
I don't think any of the ISPs in Oklahoma have ever even heard of fiber optic service. We certainly do not have Verizon FiOS available. Believe me, I've checked. And according to the Verizon website, it's only available to 13 states anyway.
Right now I'm paying $75 a month for 512k/128k DSL service. And if I ever move or leave that house, the next tenants won't even be able to get any DSL service, only dial up for them. My telco basically said that the FCC yanked their broadband license because they weren't able to provide the level of service that they should have. I get to keep mine because I'm grandfathered in. The only other solution out where I am is satellite internet. And that is an unrealistic proposition because of the lag time and data caps involved. So, for now and maybe the next 10 years, cloud collaboration is a pipe dream. I may as well book a seat on a space ship to Mars for a weekend getaway.
__________________
Justice C. Bigler www.justicebigler.com Lenovo P50: quad-core i7-6820hq, 64GB, 2TB SSD, Win 10 Pro / Protools Ultimate 2023.6 / HD|Native-TB 2018 MacBook Pro: six-core i9, 32GB, 1TB, Monterey / Protools Studio 2023.6, / DVS / DAR, L-ISA Studio Home/mobile: Focusrite Red 8Pre+HD32R / Clarett 4Pre Road/hotel: Roland OctaCaputre / Apogee One |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Arq cloud backup | reichman | Storage Subsystems | 0 | 07-23-2013 08:43 AM |
cloud storage? | reichman | Storage Subsystems | 14 | 08-08-2012 01:10 PM |
OT: Shocks in the cloud! | banana boy | General Discussion | 16 | 01-31-2012 10:17 AM |