|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
888 verses Apogee
I've read a lot of posts regarding how bad the 888 sounds. Is the apogee that much better? There is a big cost difference and I would love your opinions as to whether the difference is worth the price tag.
Thanks in advance - Peter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 verses Apogee
I can hear a big difference! The Apogee sounds more
clear bright warm deep energetic sooth analog If you don't need to record more than 2 channels at a time, you could have a 882/20 connected to an Apogee Rosetta or PSX100 that sound even better than the AD8000. I made this choice and the clients can hear the big difference! ------------------ somewhere in the planet
__________________
somewhere on the planet |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 verses Apogee
I virtually never record more than two tracks at a time, and have an 888 and a Rosetta. And I'd love to get 8 more outs, but I'll be damned if I'm going to buy another 888.
Which one of those older interfaces will transmit the full 24-bit tracks even though they can't record at 24-bit themselves? Or maybe I'm better off waiting till the new Apogee IntelliDAC comes out, and I'll have 16 additional 24-bit outs through my Adat bridge. Hmmm... Oh yeah -- the Rosetta makes stuff sounds delicious. It can make the difference between a MOTU 2408 and the 888 totally negligible. To my ears anyway... [This message has been edited by knewbee (edited March 02, 2001).] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 verses Apogee
Get an 888 and a Nanosync clock generator. It sounds great and ultimately the consumer could care less.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 verses Apogee
Who makes Nanosync?
__________________
New System: Macbook Pro M1 Max/16 gigs of Ram/Monterey/3 UAD Quad Satellites/2 PCIe Quad UAD cards/Waves Digigrid/Antelope Zen Pro/OWC 3 Slot Thunderbolt PCIe unit/Over 1400 plugins (Beta Tester for 15 different companies) YouTube Channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaZYp2wNomc |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 verses Apogee
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 verses Apogee
Thanks for the response. What is the price point for the Nanosync?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 verses Apogee
Quote:
------------------ Larry Bentley Cellar Dweller Productions www.cellardweller.com
__________________
Larry Cellar Dweller Productions PT 2020.3.0 HDX, HD IO 16x16 analog, 192 I/O, Control|24 Mac Pro 2019 16-core, 96GB RAM, OS 10.15.2 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 verses Apogee
Alto Music sells them-845 692 6922
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 verses Apogee
I'm a diehard AD8K lover/user, but I must admit that my brief A/B with the 888/Nanosync combo, while not indistinguishable, was most impressive. Perfect world, go for the AD8k. But the 888/Nanosync world certainly does not suck. At least it's a world better than the purely 888 version. Which, by the way, also doesn't suck entirely...we're dealing with greys here, not black and white.
Then again, I've cut some pretty respectable sounding vocals using the wanky little audio ins on my Powerbook... ------------------ Eric Bazilian/The Mousetrap "Music Is Good" [This message has been edited by Eric Bazilian (edited March 05, 2001).]
__________________
First the Ecstacy....then the Laundry |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DD verses DTS | Rob Aubrey | Post - Surround - Video | 2 | 10-01-2002 06:58 PM |
882/20 verses AI-3 | GRIP22 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 5 | 12-08-2001 12:21 AM |
16 bit verses 24 bit | stut5 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 4 | 07-01-2001 09:18 PM |
AES verses S/PDIF ??? | cosmic fish | General Discussion | 0 | 04-21-2001 09:57 AM |
Lucid ADA verses Apogee ADA- opinions?? | catmandoo | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 12-14-1999 11:34 PM |