|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rosendahl Nanosyncs house clock device review.
I have never tried the Ardsync but, I just completed 64 track session using the Nanosync and it gives the 888/24 a much warmer sound. Everyone commented on how it gave a analog feel to the music.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rosendahl Nanosyncs house clock device review.
The ardvark needs a distrbution box if you have a bunch of word clocks. I have an 02R, a bevy of samplers, lexicons, other digtal boxes etc. The nano looks good because of the multi clock outs on the back.
I'm going to test drive both of them later this week. I'll post my findings then. P.S. - besides the rosetta, which other convertors out there are making a good impression? |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Rosendahl Nanosyncs house clock device review.
PSX-100, but that ones the same actually,........ I keep reading all these good things about RME, but never heard them ....... and very interesting in the price department.
------------------ Chris Lambrechts digi, is this one OK ??? (no I'm not a member or employee there, I don't even know them but they try to add their 2 cents ............ and I support them doing that) http://www.copyrightcontrol.com/Clients.asp
__________________
Chris Lambrechts Applications Specialist- Live Sound |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rosendahl Nanosyncs house clock device review.
The Prism PT converter is testing at the moment. "Batman" or 'Ade' here on the DUG has one to play with!
Jules |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Rosendahl Nanosyncs house clock device review.
ok,..... the lichbeam is lit projecting the image of a bat on the sky ...... share it with us ...... or I''ll tell the world who you realy are ....... Bruce P. ............
------------------ Chris Lambrechts digi, is this one OK ??? (no I'm not a member or employee there, I don't even know them but they try to add their 2 cents ............ and I support them doing that) http://www.copyrightcontrol.com/Clients.asp
__________________
Chris Lambrechts Applications Specialist- Live Sound |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rosendahl Nanosyncs house clock device review.
The bat person is here in the UK and don't work for digi.
Jules |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rosendahl Nanosyncs house clock device review.
i dont see digital timepiece mentioned here
is it ok? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rosendahl Nanosyncs house clock device review.
Quick question, which of the two units (Nanosync and Aardsync) do people prefer - from both an audio and a features point of view? (oh yeah - and cost!). If it was a head to head, which would win?
Does anyone know UK distributers for both? And another question - When clocking your 888/24's from superclock what settings are required in the hardware menu of ProTools? How would you deal with recording digitally from a unit e.g. DAT which has no wordclock input? Presumably protools would be set to clock from the SP/DIF input for instance, then switched to (?) for clocking off the wordclock generator on playback? Thanks again for your help, E
__________________
Todays posting was brought to you by the letter e |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rosendahl Nanosyncs house clock device review.
Hi E-an,
<< Does anyone know UK distributers for both? >> No. AFAIK, HHB are the only UK distributors of the Rosenthal Nanosync (UK£775). The specs don't look quite as good for the Nanosync as they do for the Aardvark. However, the nanosync has more word clock outputs than the Aardvark; 6 in total, 3 of which can be x256 digi clock outputs. So it could be that you would need to buy an Aardvark and a distribution box to do the same job as the Nanosync. Greg |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rosendahl Nanosyncs house clock device review.
Quote:
------------------ Larry Bentley Cellar Dweller Productions www.cellardweller.com
__________________
Larry Cellar Dweller Productions PT 2020.3.0 HDX, HD IO 16x16 analog, 192 I/O, Control|24 Mac Pro 2019 16-core, 96GB RAM, OS 10.15.2 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which clock should I use Rosendahl or 192? | Robert U | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 6 | 04-01-2006 04:21 AM |
Rosendahl Nanosyncs and 888 (16Bit) | Siegfried Meier | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 10 | 11-23-2004 05:27 AM |
Review my mix please (mellow house music) | BlackOctopus | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 08-26-2003 09:16 PM |
What is best clock setup - Nanosyncs+Pro Tools+more | Digi Boy | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 4 | 09-24-2001 09:29 AM |
Which house-clock to buy??? | Robert U | Tips & Tricks | 7 | 10-25-2000 05:38 PM |