Cedar DNS One RTAS Plug in

[benjic1979]

Is there a visual noise curve in this plugin (as in the WNS, which I find quite useful), or is it exactly the same GUI as the Cedar plugin for DNS 2000/3000?

Thanks.

[Brandonx1]

It's exactly the same as the dns 3000. The plug in can also be switched to contol the hardware unit as well.
Best

[benjic1979]

Thanks for the info. I guess it must use a lot of CPU power?

[infiniteloop]

Kind of a shame they didn't have one back at Waves by doing a nice GUI plugin. The 3000 plugin is kinda basic.

[Brandonx1]

Originally Posted by infiniteloop

Kind of a shame they didn't have one back at Waves by doing a nice GUI plugin. The 3000 plugin is kinda basic.

I'd much rather have a lean, low cpu load, gui then a plug in that looks nice. I always go with function over beauty. Cedar please keep this plug in lean and mean.
Best,
Brandon

[infiniteloop]

I could sympathise if we were back using NuBis machines or something, but there's diddly squat about the WNS GUI that would even make a MacPro blink - it's not really much of an issue nowadays, surely?

[benjic1979]

As long as it sounds as good as the DNS 3000 I don't care about the GUI (I just found the noise curve on the WNS to be helpful to focus fastly on the good frequency range).

[mix109]

So if one has worked with the hardware verson,all of the automation parameters will be
'translated' correct in the plugin version and vice versa...i assume and hope

[paranerd]

I'd love to try a comparison between the Cedar plug and the WNS. Whoever buys this plug first, give this a whirl and let us know!

[MIKEROPHONICS]

I am going to the official launch tomorrow at the UK trade show
Watch this space .......

Cheers