|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post Community Terms of Use Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search Community Search Learn & Support |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Best Thunderbolt Interface?
Quote:
I have been down the same road as you. Been using Protools from inception. From SoundTools to ProtoolsHDX. I have tried to rid myself from Protools DSP systems many times. I switched from the Mix24 system to a native system but ended up with an HD system anyway because at the time Native was just to weak. Then I did the same thing when Protools switched to PCIe HD systems. Went native and came running back to HD again. When HDX came out I held out for a long time and moved to a "hybrid" system, Using Protools10HD to track and a native Protools system to mix and compose. this is where I went through all the different interfaces. And eventually I gave in again and switched to HDX. Like you I held Apogee as the standard, from the AD8000 on my Mix system to the AD16X on my HD Systems. At one point I switched to the Symphony I/O but was disappointed in the way it sounded compared to my other Apogee's. So my take on solid drivers might be somewhat different from yours. Let me explain. The reason why I keep coming back to DSP based Protools systems is not because it sounds better. Its because I like its workflow. I can track, sometimes up to 20 inputs at once, add Plug-ins and monitor of the system latency free without having to resort to using 3rd party mixing applications and separate monitor mixes. I was able to do the same thing with RME PCIe cards and to certain extend with the RME UFX on fast computers. The problem with those was that as soon as I started taxing the processor (especially VI's) it all came crashing down. When Thunderbolt was introduced I tried it all over again, got one of the first Apollo (silver face) with a Thunderbolt card to try. Only to find out the Thunderbolt card was just a firewire over Thunderbolt converter! Tried the Lynx Aurora with Thunderbolt option which came pretty close but at the time was just as expensive as using HD hardware. UAD fixed the Thunderbolt issue with the newer (black face) interfaces so I tried again. Out of all the "newer" Thunderbolt interfaces I tried (Apogee, Antelope, Apollo and Lynx) The Apollo had the highest latencies when monitoring through Protools!? And this is without even adding their plugins. So from my perspective they make the worst drivers of all of them. I have yet to try the new Lynx AuroraN series but I am sure it is as good if not better then the old ones but their pricing is insanely high. I am waiting on delivery of an new RME UFX+ and have pretty high hopes. So in conclusion, I believe that "the best" interface is really subject to the users expectations and workflow. My particular workflow is really just a continuation of old tape and in-line console based workflows. You didn't have to patch in a second sub mixer so you could hear what was being recorded at the same time as what was on tape. The same goes for Digi/Avid DSP based systems. At the end of the day for me, as long as I throw money at it the DSP workflow still works |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thunderbolt Mac interface options | Markk | Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) | 1 | 05-15-2016 10:48 AM |
Thunderbolt interface, better performance? | hakofred | Pro Tools 12 | 25 | 04-01-2016 05:13 AM |
Thunderbolt Interface | chann48211 | Getting Started | 12 | 05-27-2014 07:46 AM |
New thunderbolt interface | John_Toolbox | Third Party Interfaces | 10 | 02-15-2014 11:34 AM |
So what about new ThunderBolt interface and VENUE? | digidesigner | VENUE Live Sound Systems | 6 | 02-18-2013 09:46 AM |