|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
digi 001 vs. MOTU 1224
The following is a message I sent to MOTU preceded by their response. I forwarded this to Digidesign to get their side of the story, but have not yet heard back.
Perhaps somebody from Digi would like to respond to this letter from MOTU. I would like to hear why I would want Digi 001 over the MOTU 1224. Ethan, Thank you for your interest. I can only do part of Digi's job for them ;-) My info on the Digi 001 comes from their web site. The 001 is a combination of software and hardware. Digi wants you to use all-Digi products, so there is no support for any third-party software with the 001 hardware. We have tested Digital Performer with a beta version of the 001. The audio inputs and outputs worked with our direct I/O drivers. This functionality could be changed by Digidesign at any time. The MIDI sequencer in ProTools 5 looks a lot like Performer version 3 (circa 1990). One difference between ProTools 5LE and Digital Performer is that PT 5LE does not send or receive sync. According to the Digi site, the resolution of the 001 converters is 24 bit. They claim a dynamic range of 98 db. We get 98 db of dynamic range from the 20 bit converters on our 2408. In other words, we get the same spec at 20 bits that Digi gets at 24 bit. The 24 bit converters on our 1224 interface are rated at 116 db dynamic range. Our hardware system includes a range of four different audio interfaces which cover ADAT Lightpipe, Tascam TDIF, S/PDIF, Toslink, AES/EBU, 20 bit and 24 bit A/D-D/A converters. All our audio interfaces have word clock input and output. Sample accurate ADAT sync is built into our PCI card. The maximum number of 24 bit I/O on the MOTU system is 72 channels. In order to upgrade the MOTU system, you buy additional rack interfaces. The most expensive interface we make is the 24i which has 24 channels of balanced, +4 db, 24 inputs. The cost for the 24i rack unit is $1149.00. The Digi 001 can not be expanded unless you upgrade to ProTools TDM systems. I expect you'll be checking out the cost on that! If I can be of further service, please let me know. David Roberts - MOTU [email protected] >Digidesign told me I should ask you rather than them how compatible the >new Digi 001 dig audio i/o is with Dig Performer 2.5. > >Please also tell me how you feel the Digi 001 compares to your >comparable system, the 1224. Please compare with as many specific stats >as possible. > >Much obliged! > >-Ethan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: digi 001 vs. MOTU 1224
I would really like to know the LATENCY of Motu compared to Digi. I´ve heard that Digi wins...
__________________
Jake |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: digi 001 vs. MOTU 1224
I've heard from several users on this forum
that the latency sucks big time on the Motu systems. To me, there is too much money on the line for PT not to kick Motu's ass down the line. Yes, there are not as many features on PTLE and inputs/outputs/throughputs on the 001. But, the system is obviously meant for poeple like me who want an all inclusive gateway into recording on the computer. As time goes by, upgrades add-ons (smpte-ruler, 96k support, midi-features)will be added and PT will slaughter the MOTU system. By the way, some of you complain about the tech support. I've heard nothing but bad news about the tech support at MOTU, unless you want to give them a chance to bash the 001. They don't even have a forum to bash their products! What does that tell you?? The 001 is NOT perfect, but i'd rather by a baby pro-tools that i can take into a 'real studio' and have it run on a TDM system, than throw my money at MOTU. And you know what, there are many, many more that feel the same way. And if you don't like it, i'm sure the 002 is not too far off in the distance. haze |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: digi 001 vs. MOTU 1224
Here is Digi's response to an email with that original letter included:
The fact remains that MOTU's gear will never work with ProTools software which is industry standard and state of the art in terms of digital audio recording and editing features. Just like their 1224 the Digi001 features ADAT Lightpipe, S/PDIF and high quality 24 bit A/D-D/A converters. Head to your local Digi authoirzed retailer and check out how easy the 001 is to use and how great it sounds and we think the choice will be easy. I didn't find this response to be quite as technical as I was hoping. I did think MOTU's response was more indepth and specific. In fact, I think I got better responses on this forum from Digidesign fans than from the techs at the company. Latency is a good issue to discuss. Would somebody like to enlighten me as to how the models compare? Does anyone know? How well do softwares compensate? And doesn't MOTU make some good points in their original letter? Don't you guys think the inability to upgrade is a little offensive? Someone here mentioned their excitement about the "002." Digidesign seems to have it set up that you would have to go out and buy an entirely new system if a 002 came out. There are no ways to attach new units or upgrades to the 001. And isn't the 98db of dyn range a little low compared with many of the other models out there? Most of them are at or around 120db, which to me, the somewhat uneducated consumer, seems a lot higher than 98. Also, I wonder if there is any other way to open non protools sessions in protools. I guess plug-ins really couldn't translate, but is there NO other way to get your tracks onto a protools system? Is protools LE the only program that has that ability? And even if I got the DIGI 001, I probably wouldn't always use the protool LE, since my studio will still be largely midi based and my Dig Performer has VERY strong midi capabilities, so I wonder how well the 001 is going to function out of its software environment. Apparently DIGI is not supplying any software drivers for its unit. Any comments or answers to my questions are much appreciated. [This message has been edited by ewhite (edited 11-17-99).] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: digi 001 vs. MOTU 1224
First off MOTU service via email is extremely good. I have emailed them over 30 times and have always recieved a response to my question. I currently own Digital Performer 2.5 which contains Audiodesk which is what comes with the 2408. I seen the 001 video and sorry to say but Audiodesk has a MUCH better interface and 10 times the amount of plugins that are also real time. The latency on the MOTU has just never bothered me.However, I am not that crazy about the reverb.
PT LE looks way out dated. Come on Digi how hard would it have been to make it look better? I think Digi is just getting into this type of market cause they know in a year or so computers will be able to handle the processing like their TDM stuff.Bet their ****ing in their pants. I am patiently waiting for a better 001. Maybe thee 002. We'll have to wait and see. Take care. Scott |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: digi 001 vs. MOTU 1224
Motu no matter how you spin it the bottom line comes down to this.
1. LATENCY (no truly professional studio could make a dime if they advertised that they have a 2408). 2. Look in any add for a recording studio. No one says "Hey come record here, I have performer and a 2408". 3. Pro Tools software/hardware is in the serious studios and they are not ashamed to let you know it. 4. The 001 is a quality interface, not the "best" interface but it's quality for a good price. The 2408's are okay and they offer quite a few added features (adat sync ect..) but the 2408 is not a high end interface either. To me it comes down to do you wanna start learning pro tools software now or later. If you stay serious with your music you'll end up in front of a pro tools system sooner or later in somebodys studio. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DIGI 001 and Motu 2048 MK II or Motu 24i+ Logic Audio | cyril | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 02-19-2002 09:08 PM |
How's the sonic quality of the MOTU 1224 interface? | PwAg | General Discussion | 1 | 12-11-2001 12:39 AM |
Digi 001 vs Motu 2408 & 1224 | Music_Pal | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 10-30-2001 10:57 AM |
MOTU 1224 truble | rcr | Digidesign Hardware & Software | 1 | 10-31-2000 10:09 AM |
MOTU 1224 | LidMan | General Discussion | 1 | 06-19-1999 11:39 AM |