Was looking at finally buying HEAT..really?

[TNM]

...and low and behold, i was lucky enough to find topics disclosing that it worked on audio tracks ONLY..

Can someone confirm this is still the case? And if so, isn't it actually kind of useless for the modern ITB composer?

It feels like typical Avid where it's done half way if this is the case.. Who on Earth WOULDN'T want to add it to VI's and submix busses?

I really hope this is wrong, but if not, I am glad I just saved myself 200 bucks.

Sheesh!

[Jay_uk]

https://www.pro-tools-expert.com/hom...e-have-answers

[Southsidemusic]

So only on Audio Tracks then

[TNM]

Ahh the posts I had found via google were much older.. so, it's a shame to see it's still the case.. Hard pass then.. Would rather just get phoenix or something and put it wherever I like...
I don't like the idea of bussing things to armed audio tracks to apply it to other sources, especially with the PT performance issues I have with record monitored tracks..
It's not as if avid CAN'T add it to all track types.

[AlexLakis]

HEAT is all ready applied to each track, HEAT on buses would mean double-processing, no? What's the problem?

[Sardi]

Originally Posted by AlexLakis

HEAT is all ready applied to each track, HEAT on buses would mean double-processing, no? What's the problem?

Not instrument tracks though and that’s the OP’s issue.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk