|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
16" Macbook Pro M2 Max 12 Core 64 GB RAM vs 16" Macbook Pro M3 Max 14 Core 36 GB RAM?
Which would you choose for mixing audio only with Pro Tools? Maybe some light VI work.
Sessions can get up to 100 audio tracks here
__________________
Pro Tools Studio 2024.3| Eucon 2023.11 | Mac OS 14.3.1 | Soundflow | Streamdeck | 16" Apple MacBook Pro M3 Max 16 Core 64 GB RAM | 2020 MacBook Pro 13" M1 16 GB RAM | Hackintosh i9 9900KS 32 GB RAM |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 16" Macbook Pro M2 Max 12 Core 64 GB RAM vs 16" Macbook Pro M3 Max 14 Core 36 GB
16" Macbook Pro M2 Max 12 Core 64 GB RAM
The reason is 64GB RAM Bump up the RAM of the M3 Max and I’d go with that one. Same RAM but more performance cores Last edited by its2loud; 02-15-2024 at 02:16 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 16" Macbook Pro M2 Max 12 Core 64 GB RAM vs 16" Macbook Pro M3 Max 14 Core 36 GB
Quote:
Bumping up the RAM is expensive, with 3 options. 1. 14 Core M3 Max with 96 GB RAM = + £800 2. 16 Core M3 Max with 48 GB RAM = + £300 3. 16 Core M3 Max with 64 GB RAM = + £500
__________________
Pro Tools Studio 2024.3| Eucon 2023.11 | Mac OS 14.3.1 | Soundflow | Streamdeck | 16" Apple MacBook Pro M3 Max 16 Core 64 GB RAM | 2020 MacBook Pro 13" M1 16 GB RAM | Hackintosh i9 9900KS 32 GB RAM |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 16" Macbook Pro M2 Max 12 Core 64 GB RAM vs 16" Macbook Pro M3 Max 14 Core 36 GB
Maybe you can get by with 48 but there’s no way to know how you run things on your systems.
Every application open eats up RAM. Are you using the video engine? That eats up RAM. You’ve been down this road before. Look at your system monitor for a typical session and see how much RAM you’re using for all processes. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 16" Macbook Pro M2 Max 12 Core 64 GB RAM vs 16" Macbook Pro M3 Max 14 Core 36 GB
Quote:
__________________
Pro Tools Studio 2024.3| Eucon 2023.11 | Mac OS 14.3.1 | Soundflow | Streamdeck | 16" Apple MacBook Pro M3 Max 16 Core 64 GB RAM | 2020 MacBook Pro 13" M1 16 GB RAM | Hackintosh i9 9900KS 32 GB RAM |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 16" Macbook Pro M2 Max 12 Core 64 GB RAM vs 16" Macbook Pro M3 Max 14 Core 36 GB
Right. Cuz it specifically comes down to RAM between the two machines. What you gain in performance cores is meaningless if your system runs out of available RAM.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 16" Macbook Pro M2 Max 12 Core 64 GB RAM vs 16" Macbook Pro M3 Max 14 Core 36 GB
Your emphasis on RAM is duly noted and I appreciate your insight into its significance. However, it's imperative to take a holistic approach, considering both RAM and processing power. While the 36 GB configuration will suffice presently based on system reporting, there's a legitimate concern regarding its future-proofing capabilities. In light of this, I still find myself now leaning towards the M3 Max, which offers not only ample RAM but also enhanced processing capabilities. Thank you for your input.
__________________
Pro Tools Studio 2024.3| Eucon 2023.11 | Mac OS 14.3.1 | Soundflow | Streamdeck | 16" Apple MacBook Pro M3 Max 16 Core 64 GB RAM | 2020 MacBook Pro 13" M1 16 GB RAM | Hackintosh i9 9900KS 32 GB RAM |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2008 era MacPro 3,1 3Ghz Quad-Core vs current MacBook Pro 15" | IVcrane | macOS | 4 | 01-09-2016 01:56 PM |
PT9 works with 15" 2.0 Ghz Intel Core Duo Macbook Pro? | Max H. | macOS | 8 | 02-17-2013 09:14 AM |
New Macbook Pro i7 or "old" Macpro 8 core | tomdiek | macOS | 9 | 08-13-2011 08:33 PM |
HD Native not working on new MacBook Pro 17" Quad-Core, Magma EB1H | kevinmac | Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) | 4 | 03-08-2011 10:42 PM |
High Pitched Tone, Macbook Pro 17" 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo | Tbassist4 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 09-18-2008 02:43 PM |