|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Auto tune graphic mode in 96k session?
Does "graphic' mode work correctly in 96 k sessions?
I can't seen to get AT to track properly in the session I'm working in at the moment. When I export the track into a 44.1.khz session, graphic mode works properly on the same source material. thanks, Ken Sluiter |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Auto tune graphic mode in 96k session?
I've had the same problem... You have to use RTAS at 96k. It tracks amazingly well. Better than 44.1 or 48k by a mile.
Cheers |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Auto tune graphic mode in 96k session?
Thanks, Mixchump. That, indeed does work better. Nice tip!
KS |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Auto tune graphic mode in 96k session?
Are you using Version 4?
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tick Based Mode = Better Auto Tune Sync???? | John Pisciotta | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 04-27-2005 09:03 AM |
Auto-Tune in Graphical Mode at 96k | tedness | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 12 | 02-03-2005 09:29 AM |
auto tune graphic dead? | David Schober | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 3 | 07-28-2004 07:13 AM |
OT: how to apply Auto Tune 3 in graphical mode DX | Bermaster | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 5 | 01-21-2004 11:01 AM |
Anyone used to the TDM Auto Tune..How is the RTAS version? Graphic mode? | Jules | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 9 | 08-04-2000 08:04 AM |