|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post Community Terms of Use Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search Community Search Learn & Support |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: S3L-X twice the RAM of S3L
For shure it will still work, but its like you`ve been sold an M7CL 3 Months before the CL Range appears.
U know what i mean. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: S3L-X twice the RAM of S3L
So far I understand that S3L-X = S3L + twice the ram + Venue 4.5 software. I strongly doubt there is a higher sample rate or any change in the hardware other than different ram strips
__________________
UAD Apollo x16, UAD Apollo Twin Duo, UAD Octo Thunderbolt, Mac Mini i7 2018, Reaper DAW, Presonus Faderport, Arturia Beastep for DAW control, Former Pro Tools HD user (from V7 until V12.6). |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: S3L-X twice the RAM of S3L
Not really,
S3L headphone amp is real crap. Maybe OK for live PFL but not good enough for studio use at all.
__________________
www.tonkultur.ch - remote recording services |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Re: S3L-X twice the RAM of S3L
Interesting. If the S3 is going enabled as a DAW interface/control surface when not used with Venue (as stated) why wouldn't Avid upgrade S3 for higher sample rate capabilities (inputs, outputs, and headphone amp)?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: S3L-X twice the RAM of S3L
I would think that SR capability would be determined by the converters themselves which are mostly in the I/O racks, so not something an upgraded surface could provide.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Re: S3L-X twice the RAM of S3L
Avid's press release stated the S3 will become a 4X6 audio interface for Protools and other DAWs...
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Re: S3L-X twice the RAM of S3L
Quote:
Thanks Christopher
__________________
Best Regards Christopher #thestruggleisreal South Side Music Group WEBHOME |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Re: S3L-X twice the RAM of S3L
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: S3L-X twice the RAM of S3L
Yes, but this was advertised as one of the bemefits with 4.5 before. So not new for S3L-X.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Re: S3L-X twice the RAM of S3L
Quote:
Greater Protools integration would be a benefit of the Eucon update. Upgraded output path(s) would be the benefit of newer S3s... No? I'm curious about the converter resolution and any potential hardware upgrade needed to record up to 192 in the DAW interface mode. |
|
|