Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-02-2008, 08:08 AM
Vogger Vogger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 28
Default Intel iMac 3.06 GHz not \"Officially Qualified\"

Hello,

I am considering buying an iMac 3.06 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo (and Pro Tools LE 7.3/Digi 003) to replace my Quicksilver G4 (ProTools LE 6.4/ Digi 001).

Digidesign's site refers to this 3.06 GHz iMac as "Not Tested," whereas a lot of other iMacs are referred to as "Officially Qualified Intel-based iMac Models."

http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?...4&itemid=24155

Does this mean that the 3.06 GHz iMac is NOT recommended for Pro Tools use for some specific reason? Or is it merely that Digidesign hasn't gotten around to testing it with Pro Tools yet, and that Pro Tools can't test every Mac under the sun, etc.? Has anyone been using such an iMac with Pro Tools, and if so, what is your experience?

Thanks!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-02-2008, 01:47 PM
albee1952's Avatar
albee1952 albee1952 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norwich, CT
Posts: 39,330
Default Re: Intel iMac 3.06 GHz not \"Officially Qualified\"

Being a new computer, it will likely ship with Leopard installed. The newest pre-release version of PT will only work on OSX10.5.3 AFAIK. It will probably work fine once PT and Apple get together but no one seems to know when this will happen. Maybe just drag your feet for a few more weeks. I am waiting and thinking about the very same iMac.
__________________
HP Z4 workstation, Mbox Studio
https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...0sound%20works


The better I drink, the more I mix

BTW, my name is Dave, but most people call me.........................Dave
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-03-2008, 10:35 AM
Vogger Vogger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 28
Default Re: Intel iMac 3.06 GHz not \"Officially Qualified\"

Albee1952, Thanks very much.

I specifically am concerned not so much about the operating system, but about that particular iMac model not having been "officially qualified" by Digidesign. Is it possible that some Mac models are not fit for Pro Tools, because there's something incompatible about the processor, etc.?

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-03-2008, 11:08 AM
Slim Shady Slim Shady is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 7,527
Default Re: Intel iMac 3.06 GHz not \"Officially Qualified\"

No, it's just that those models just came out a month ago. It usually takes at least a month, often longer, for a new computer model to get officially approved by Digi, and with the Leopard patch taking precedent they probably haven't even started on it yet. I wouldn't be concerned about it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-04-2008, 11:47 AM
Vogger Vogger is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 28
Default Re: Intel iMac 3.06 GHz not \"Officially Qualified\"

SlimShady, Albee1952 and other friends,

I am still a bit too freaked out to pull the trigger and buy the iMac 3.06. I went to a store in NYC today to buy an iMac, and even the sales guy, who is a Pro Tools Mac specialist, was like, "Are you SURE you want to get an iMac?" His point was that most customers opt for laptops or Mac Pro, and that iMac is generally not the best mix with Pro Tools software and hardware....

I tried calling Digidesign to ask them about this but it seems that you cannot just "call" Digidesign.

Has Digidesign ever come out and said, "The so-and-so model Mac is just not suitable for Pro Tools"? And, is it possible they'll simply never test the 3.06 GHz iMac (and other models) with Pro Tools??

I just don't want to take a chance and go home with the wrong model, you know?

Thanks for reading, please let me know if you have any additional thoughts, warnings, or assurances.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-04-2008, 12:12 PM
Matt Darcy Matt Darcy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bath UK
Posts: 432
Default Re: Intel iMac 3.06 GHz not \"Officially Qualified\"

re-read what's been said.

1.) the machine is new - it's not been officially tested with pro-tools yet, hence not "certified" It should work as it's only the processor speed that changed....so if you OS supports it you should be fine

2.) Pro-tools is not support/has issues on Lepord - which your mac will come with, this should concern you more than a processor upgrade. There are pre-release versions of pro-tools that still have issues and you still can't use the latest Mac OS software updates, this SHOULD concern you much more.

3.) The sales guy suggested a mac book as it's light/small/portable most people tend to go for these (from what I've read) over imacs. There are some minor hardware differences but all in all an imac should work just as good as a macbook - or the specialist guy you saw should have said " this won't work as well as a macbook"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-04-2008, 12:21 PM
Slim Shady Slim Shady is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 7,527
Default Re: Intel iMac 3.06 GHz not \"Officially Qualified\"

Quote:
Has Digidesign ever come out and said, "The so-and-so model Mac is just not suitable for Pro Tools"?
Yes. There have been problems with USB and Firewire implementation in some *much* older model desktop and laptop macs (G4/G5 models). Those models never got qualified for use with some PT interfaces, or alternately required extra hardware add-ons in order to overcome the deficiencies in those models.

Quote:
And, is it possible they'll simply never test the 3.06 GHz iMac (and other models) with Pro Tools??
No. They test every single model Apple releases. Since there has been no major architecture change from the several previous revisions of the iMac, you can be assured the chances of the new models somehow having some major flaw that keeps PT from running on them are pretty much next to nothing.

Now, as far as the Mac Pro vs. iMac thing, keep in mind your salesperson makes more money off you if you buy the Mac Pro. That being said, I'm a Tower user, and always will be, but that's because I NEED the extra internal expansion the tower models give you. I add PCI cards, hard drives and upgrade memory often, which is not really possible with the iMacs. However from a processing perspective, you get a lot of horsepower for your money (and a nice screen) from the iMacs, and if you don't need all the internal expansion options of the towers, the iMacs are mighty fine machines for using with PTLE as long as you give yourself a decent amount of RAM to work with and have a good external firewire drive to run your sessions on.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mac OS X 10.6.8 Officially Qualified Avid Technical Alerts 0 08-05-2011 03:58 PM
Mac OS X 10.6.8 Officially Qualified Avid Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) 0 08-05-2011 03:58 PM
Mac OS X 10.6.6 Officially Qualified Avid Technical Alerts 0 01-24-2011 09:42 PM
Mac OS X 10.6.5 Officially Qualified Avid Technical Alerts 0 12-24-2010 06:39 PM
Is this drive qualified for PT LE, intel iMac stratquebec 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 8 08-31-2009 04:52 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com