Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Software > macOS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41  
Old 01-26-2020, 11:35 AM
Frank Kruse Frank Kruse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: old europe
Posts: 5,458
Default Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darryl Ramm View Post
which is also basically what I just said... but we do not know what other processing, manipulation you may be doing to files. I expect this to not be an issue for most users. It can be an issue for things like older designed databases, and sometimes databases get embedded in software your would never expect. I just want users to be aware that it may be possible to run into cases of pathological performance with APFS on HDD...

---

I am not sure what the argument going on is here...
Not arguing at all. I guess I didn't understand fully what you meant by simple editing makes no difference but editing that changes actual media on disk did, which is why I wasn't seeing any difference in PT. We're probably saying the same thing.

Someone asked if APFS makes a difference in PT and I reported my findings on a 12-core 5,1 mac. That's it. YMMV.

__________________
PTHDn 2019.12 (OSX10.14.6), 8x8x8, MacPro 5,1 3.33Ghz 12-Core, BM DeckLink SDI, SYNC HD, all genlocked via AJA GEN10, 48GB RAM
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 01-26-2020, 05:41 PM
DetroitT's Avatar
DetroitT DetroitT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Detroit, Mi, USA
Posts: 2,163
Default Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?

Both!
Back when I came into Mojave after several install test times -
HFS+, APFS need to share a bit more.

Active sessions, HFS+ for convenience.

Libraries 2-10TB (or Greater) spinners-APFS into Volumes = best for my system and going forward.
Online Data spinners (8TB <)
__________________
(Help us Help You)<<<click here

APFS 90% 10% Audio on Both
(HFS+)
Pro Tools U-2019.12 macOS 10.14.6 APFS
Second boot-macOS 10.13.6 (Avid HDX-1 Omni)

(MP 5,1 / 64-Gb)
(Sapphire RX-580 MVC-Edition)
MOTU FW-CoreAudio (for poly recording)
(SSL-HUI-MIDIoverIP)
----
music-design-creation
Post Music-Sound mixing, Production-Enhancements.

Audio Tuning and System Services
new systems builds/upkeep
----
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 01-28-2020, 03:44 PM
Oliver M Oliver M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Europe
Posts: 994
Default Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darryl Ramm View Post
Worrying about boot time "problems" for NVMe or APFS seems silly,
In terms of what?
There are problems with it and ignoring the fact doesn't help the issue.
Whenever I have APFS formatted drives attached to my audio Macs (Mac Pros 5,1, 6 and 12-Core) I see such boot delays.
And its random, the delays do not always occur but often enough so that it pisses me off.

To call this a silly problem is arrogant and ignorant.

Believe me that I tried all kind of things, I have tested more M.2 SSDs than anyone else around here, AHCI & NVMe, tons of PCIe cards to carry them, I have tested tons of GPUs as well. Tested with and without all my PCIe cards sitting in the slots. Its been nailed down to APFS.

You may have your theory knowledge from PDF data or something, I have actually tested real world scenarios, myself!

I am sticking to HFS+ on my 5,1 MPs, especially for the Startup (HFS+) drive, even though its complicated to keep it up to date with security updates as Apple blocked HFS+ drives from updating the OS directly.

I think we won't find a solution to those issues but claiming that they are silly is inappropriate.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 01-28-2020, 04:22 PM
Darryl Ramm Darryl Ramm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 13,609
Default Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?

It sure seems silly to me that you keep complaining about this, and when you list what you have tried not a single one of those things is anything I would try if facing this. Have you tried a simple google search? Why for example am I not seeing mentions you have excluded the "spaceman_trim_free_blocks" know issue, or upgraded macOS to a version that fixes that? There are many great threads out there about boot time issues and fixes, including that issue and more. I have never been able to follow a coherent thread you have posted describing exactly what problem you have, with exactly what configuration and versions of stuff you have, and exactly what clear troubleshooting you have tried. Most of your posts tend be more like you throwing out a little detail and then whining about the boot time, and as a consequence you set yourself up to be ignored. I don't doubt you are seeing issues, but I do suspect you have not troubleshot them as well as you could have. But keep posting here... and I will keep warning folks to ignore you...

Last edited by Darryl Ramm; 01-28-2020 at 04:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 01-29-2020, 06:07 AM
musicman691 musicman691 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Soprano State (NJ)
Posts: 16,946
Default Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darryl Ramm View Post
It sure seems silly to me that you keep complaining about this, and when you list what you have tried not a single one of those things is anything I would try if facing this. Have you tried a simple google search? Why for example am I not seeing mentions you have excluded the "spaceman_trim_free_blocks" know issue, or upgraded macOS to a version that fixes that? There are many great threads out there about boot time issues and fixes, including that issue and more. I have never been able to follow a coherent thread you have posted describing exactly what problem you have, with exactly what configuration and versions of stuff you have, and exactly what clear troubleshooting you have tried. Most of your posts tend be more like you throwing out a little detail and then whining about the boot time, and as a consequence you set yourself up to be ignored. I don't doubt you are seeing issues, but I do suspect you have not troubleshot them as well as you could have. But keep posting here... and I will keep warning folks to ignore you...
Keep on warning folks Darryl - I've been through this same malarkey with Oliver M. before. There's one thing I can say for him and that is that he's consistent.

As I mentioned I did some Googling and one of the things I found that seemed to be the majority cause and that's having trim enabled in early revisions of High Sierra. Some even mentioned that later revisions fixed the issue but didn't see what explicit OSX fixed the issue. All I know is that I've not had any issue with boot slowdown with OSX 10.13.6 and APFS.
__________________
Jack
See profile for system details
iMac dead & retired as of 11/4/17

QAPLA!
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 01-29-2020, 07:05 AM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 17,713
Default Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?

Guys if it was so easy to google all the answers why would we have DUC to begin with?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 01-29-2020, 02:42 PM
Darryl Ramm Darryl Ramm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 13,609
Default Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JFreak View Post
Guys if it was so easy to google all the answers why would we have DUC to begin with?
In this case, where stuff has *nothing* to do with Pro Tools and presents itself in such an obvious glaring pain in the ass way... then focusing on DUC is likely a waste of time. There are hundreds of past threads on the interwebs about boot time issues with Cheesegraters and other Macs, ... with NVMe drives, APFS etc., multiple separate issues, ranging from POST sequences, to TRIM issues, to APFS bugs.... and *many* of those include important solutions where folk have seen problems. If folks want help from others on DUC... then maybe explain exactly what has been tried, which of those know issues have been checked and did not help, provide exact configs etc. ... and clearly in this case it's not an issue lots of folks here are seeing.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 01-30-2020, 04:44 PM
Oliver M Oliver M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Europe
Posts: 994
Default Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darryl Ramm View Post
It sure seems silly to me that you keep complaining about this, and when you list what you have tried not a single one of those things is anything I would try if facing this. Have you tried a simple google search? Why for example am I not seeing mentions you have excluded the "spaceman_trim_free_blocks" know issue, or upgraded macOS to a version that fixes that? There are many great threads out there about boot time issues and fixes, including that issue and more. I have never been able to follow a coherent thread you have posted describing exactly what problem you have, with exactly what configuration and versions of stuff you have, and exactly what clear troubleshooting you have tried. Most of your posts tend be more like you throwing out a little detail and then whining about the boot time, and as a consequence you set yourself up to be ignored. I don't doubt you are seeing issues, but I do suspect you have not troubleshot them as well as you could have. But keep posting here... and I will keep warning folks to ignore you...
You are a real *******.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 01-30-2020, 04:45 PM
Oliver M Oliver M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Europe
Posts: 994
Default Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by musicman691 View Post
Keep on warning folks Darryl - I've been through this same malarkey with Oliver M. before. There's one thing I can say for him and that is that he's consistent.

As I mentioned I did some Googling and one of the things I found that seemed to be the majority cause and that's having trim enabled in early revisions of High Sierra. Some even mentioned that later revisions fixed the issue but didn't see what explicit OSX fixed the issue. All I know is that I've not had any issue with boot slowdown with OSX 10.13.6 and APFS.
You are a lamer! LOL
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 01-30-2020, 05:10 PM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 17,713
Default Re: APFS or Extended Journaled for session drive?

Enough with the name calling?
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Journaled or Extended... delaplanemusic Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 5 04-14-2008 02:35 AM
Journaled Drive SteveGarman Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 4 12-05-2006 02:47 AM
EXTENDED Vs JOURNALED HD FORMATS Dual Mackie Storage Subsystems 3 02-25-2005 05:41 PM
Mac OsX Extended Journaled Problem Luis Miguel Storage Subsystems 4 11-03-2004 08:21 AM
Format Extended or Extended Journaled for PT6.2.3? AAR Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 3 02-06-2004 08:46 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:20 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com