|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: HW Buffer Size
I mean I listen to the signal befor it goes through the DAW. Straight from the preamp to my headphone amp. You need a pre with send and a headphone amp with two inputs. One from the preamp send and the other from the DAW. Alternatively you could use a mixer.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: HW Buffer Size
Quote:
Personally I don't think it is a problem, you just won't here your punch-in with delay, but the track in the daw will remain synced... |
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: HW Buffer Size
Quote:
I was checking out those two HD's you mentioned; they both sound great! The Samsung 850 Evo SATA III SSD seems like the better drive (great reviews), but it's internal and I need an external. The Samsung T3 gets great reviews too, so I'll probably go with that one. My last HD was a Western Digital and it wasn't too reliable; it broke down fairly quickly and I lost a ton of files. I'll never buy that brand again. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I haven't had any issues using the SSD boot drive for recording. The track count depends on the session. I usually go with 24bits at 44.1Hz when tracking. Once I get a second HD I'll probably move up to 48 or 96Hz since I'll have extra HD space to work with. Once I save up the cash to buy the HD, I'll try using it to record my PT sessions to see if there's a quality difference. What's you're take on creating HD partitions. Some articles I've read recommend setting up a partition for recording and another for backup. Others say the partitions put too much strain on the HD and to just leave it be (no partitions). As far as the HW Buffer size goes, I also use a low buffer size when tracking, 64 or 128, and then 512 or 1024 when mixing. Thanks for all the help, -Adam |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Re: HW Buffer Size
If you just Google "Pro Tools recording with SSD Boot Drive" you'll see a ton of forum threads of people doing just this with no issues. I definitely need a backup hard drive, but I'm probably just gonna go with Seagate 1TB 5400 RPM that's under $60. I don't have the cash at the moment to drop two hundo on a hard drive. It's not quick enough to record with, but it will free up much needed space on my boot drive, as well as add space for other things. I'd rather save money for a pair of studio monitors.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Re: HW Buffer Size
Quote:
Actually I have a own muted track just for recording in every session. When I'm done recording I just move the region up to a unmuted track. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Re: HW Buffer Size
Cool. Thanks.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HW Buffer Size
Quote:
And on DUC you'll see many of those posts are by uh *me*, specifically talking about the fast PCIe SSDs in some Mac computers. And now that I see you provided corrected information the MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid 2014) you have--that changes everything. That MBP has a M.2 type form factor *PCIe* SSD. Early drives at least in that MBP were PCIe SSD x2 lane, some drives may be x4 lane and offer higher performance. OS X system information for your drive show the number of lanes for that drive. Still either are much higher perforamnce than SATA III (6 Gbs) SSD drives. You were asking about reducing IO buffer size for tracking. But again, if you are monitoring through the Apollo Console then just leave the playback buffer set large. Back to that: You need to undertand monitoring option, you payed for all this in the Apollo, make sure you undertand it. A simple starting step is to go mute all tracks you are recoding to in Pro Tools. Play with the Apollo Console so you now hear those armed tracks via the console. Just play around and understand stuff. This is analogous to the other posts here talking about analog monitoring or monitoring through an analog console. All zero/very low latency ways of monitoring without putting any additional load on the DAW. And in the Apollo Console you get to monitor through and track through (if you want) UAD plugins running in the Apollo console (*not* Pro Tools). Last edited by Darryl Ramm; 12-07-2016 at 03:49 PM. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HW Buffer Size
Quote:
You should not be ever sharing a HDD as a boot/system and recording drive. (yes I know you don't have a HDD, but you are reading confused "advice" about HDDs). Some confused folks talk about partitioning that drive so there is a separate boot/system and audio/session partitions. They don't realize that makes things *worse* not better. The systems requirements when using HDD is you have separate disk drives for boot/system and audio/session files. It is a simple as that, separate disk drives means exactly that, not two partitions on a single drive. It's sad how much this crap persists out in the Interwebs and on DUC. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Re: HW Buffer Size
Quote:
I'll probably go with a SSD drive; they're much cheaper than the high RPM HDD drives. The Samsung T3 you recommended seems like a solid drive. I also have been looking at the PNY Elite SSD drive. It's only $79 for the 240GB and $129 for the 480GB; The T3 is $181 for 500GB. Anyone familiar with the PNY Elite? It's more in my my price range. Thanks. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HW Buffer Size
Quote:
You seem to be reading too much stuff and unable to filter male cow manure, or badly out of date information, from relevant information. No HDD has performance exceeding a good SSD, at worse you are limited by SATA III perforamnce, at best with PCIE SSDs sequential throughput of a drive is several times to an order of magnitude or more (for every high end NVMe/PCIE SSDs) faster than a good HDD. I've already recommended you just get a T3 if you want an external audio/session drive, my advice is you just listen to that advice. The PNY Elite is not even comparable to something like the T3. If there was something else as good as a T3 I'd have recommended it. There are lots of intersting more expensive options but I already went to a cost-efficient choice for you. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Increase Buffer Size Error (Buffer at MAX) ??? | PoPimp3069 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 16 | 03-29-2010 02:24 PM |
6086, buffer underflow, hw buffer size and other errors on i7 | rhythmtechnologies | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 11 | 05-30-2009 08:36 AM |
Increase Buffer size/Decrease Buffer size? | kerick | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 1 | 12-28-2006 12:00 AM |
Hardware buffer size in relation to DAE buffer | sricabla | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 06-04-2006 10:30 AM |
Increase buffer size...decrease buffer size.... | Bodhisan | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 1 | 02-08-2005 07:24 PM |