|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Avid: new HW?? HDX 8 years old!!!
Unless you have a "perfect" converter, then yes, working at 48k is better. Don't worry about SRC too much.
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Avid: new HW?? HDX 8 years old!!!
Agree, you should stay at 44.1 if you are working with sample libraries that were sampled at 44.1 (kontakt, VSL etc.) for avoiding too many SRC.
__________________
Avid HDX - Avid HD I/O 16x16 Analog - Pro Tools Ultimate 2023.6 - Nuendo 11 Mac Pro 5.1 2 esacore 2.66 64GB Ram - Mac OS 11.7.7 |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Avid: new HW?? HDX 8 years old!!!
Quote:
__________________
Avid HDX - Avid HD I/O 16x16 Analog - Pro Tools Ultimate 2023.6 - Nuendo 11 Mac Pro 5.1 2 esacore 2.66 64GB Ram - Mac OS 11.7.7 |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Avid: new HW?? HDX 8 years old!!!
Definitely better to work at 48 vs 44.1. All your recording, mixing, EQ, etc is done on the higher sample rate audio. Then do ONE last conversion down to 44.1 at the end. Or better yet, let your mastering engineer convert down to 44.1 when HE is done manipulating the audio.
__________________
offthewallproductions Mac Pro 5,1 3.46 Ghz 12 core, Open Core 0.9.8, Radeon RX580 GPU, GC-TITAN RIDGE TB3 PCIe card, M.2 NVMe SSD boot drive on PCIe card, 48GB RAM, macOS 12.7.4 Pro Tools Ultimate 2024.3.1/HD Driver 2023.3 HDX, UA Octo PCIe card in external TB3 chassis, MTRX Studio I/O, C|24 control surface. Genelec 1031AP/7070A 5.1 monitoring. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Avid: new HW?? HDX 8 years old!!!
Seems like it mostly has to do with your hardware.
SlateDigital, for example, suggests 96k because it "sounds better on their converters." |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Avid: new HW?? HDX 8 years old!!!
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Avid: new HW?? HDX 8 years old!!!
Most VI sample libraries that I know of are 48k which means there is little to no advantage of running 96k
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Avid: new HW?? HDX 8 years old!!!
Does anyone know if the current HDX PCIe cards will work in PCIe 4.0 mobos? Or will new updated cards be required?
__________________
Armando |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Avid: new HW?? HDX 8 years old!!!
Usually new spec is backwards compatible with old one, assuming the connectors are not changed -- but both will need to be new spec if you wish any extra speed.
Avid has not shared any plans of releasing new cards, which still may not mean they are not around the corder. This kind of info is usually available on release date, not before.
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Avid: new HW?? HDX 8 years old!!!
Quote:
PCIe is usually backwards and forwards compatible. So you can use a 2.0 card in a 3.0 or 4.0 slot. Also, a new 3.0 graphics card can work in a 2.0 slot (but at a slower speed), etc. Most Mac users have an HDX card in a 5,1 MacPro with 2.0 slots, while most PC users have had them in 3.0 slots for a long time. It’ll work fine in the new MacPro.
__________________
Pro Tools Ultimate, HDX3 & MTRX + HD MADI 7,1 MacPro, 3.2GHz 16-core, OSX 10.15 S6 M40 48-5, panners, MPM,Dolby Atmos RMU AJA Kona LHi, Sync HD www.ToolshedAudioPost.com www.TheToolshedStudio.com Certified for Dolby Atmos Home Entertainment |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WHY did I not do this 10 years ago?! | midnightrambler | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 6 | 08-19-2010 07:23 AM |
What now , after all these years ...??? | gweber | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 23 | 05-31-2007 10:56 AM |
OT - How was your New Years gig? | bigd | General Discussion | 7 | 01-05-2005 01:57 AM |
OT - 60 Years After D-Day | The Weed | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 4 | 06-07-2004 01:49 PM |
24/96 Two Years away? | Mark Jiaras | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 21 | 12-05-2000 04:14 PM |