Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-03-2004, 09:40 PM
Loudnoize Ent. Loudnoize Ent. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 485
Default Latency... Even with a Mixer?

Hey Guys, Should I be experiencing latency even if I monitor through a mixer? If not, I'm not quite sure what I'm doing wrong. I have the MBox. Maybe I need to check something on/off? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks.

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03-2004, 10:01 PM
dans dans is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Boston
Posts: 440
Default Re: Latency... Even with a Mixer?

If you're monitoring through your mixer, the will be no latency (at least none that most humans can hear). If, however, you are hearing both the direct signal and the signal from the outputs of the Mbox mixed together, then you will hear a phasing kind of sound. Can you describe your signal path and the symptoms a little better?
__________________
It's not what you know that is important...it's what you can figure out.

G4 1.25DP/FW800/1.25GB/OS X 10.3.5/Digi 001/LE 6.4
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-04-2004, 12:26 AM
Loudnoize Ent. Loudnoize Ent. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 485
Default Re: Latency... Even with a Mixer?

Well for example, I'll have a guitar plugged into a preamp, then a compressor and then into a mixer input. The subgroup of that input will go into the Mbox. The output of the Mbox is routed back into 2 other mixer input channels. Seems to be a fairly easy setup. I was once told to mute the recorded channel in PT when recording. Is this neccesary when using a mixer? I understand when using Audio Instruments, I probably will need to buffer it down to 256 but for external devices using a mixer doesn't make sense to me. Any advice?

Thanks, Chris
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-04-2004, 09:03 AM
dans dans is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Boston
Posts: 440
Default Re: Latency... Even with a Mixer?

The import detail you are leaving out: where are your headphones plugged in? Assuming they are in the mixer, which would be the right way to do it, then you must mute the recorded channels in PTLE. Otherwise, you'll hear both their direct signal from the mixer and the latent signal from the Mbox. That's bad and sounds like crud. Also, be careful of feedback loops. Every now and then I'll be patching things through different busses and all of a sudden, I get a crazy loud feedback loop because I've routed the output of my 001 back into the input of a record-enabled, non-muted track.
__________________
It's not what you know that is important...it's what you can figure out.

G4 1.25DP/FW800/1.25GB/OS X 10.3.5/Digi 001/LE 6.4
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-04-2004, 01:33 PM
Loudnoize Ent. Loudnoize Ent. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 485
Default Re: Latency... Even with a Mixer?

Hey dans, Well my phones are plugged into the mixer. I guess what you're saying is no matter what I do, there will always be latency, mixer or not. I've just been so use to DP and Cue Mix. Tell me, how should I have the Mix knob on the Mbox placed while monitoring through a mixer... left towards input, playback or around 12 o'clock?

Thanks. CL
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-04-2004, 02:16 PM
dans dans is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Boston
Posts: 440
Default Re: Latency... Even with a Mixer?

I don't have the Mbox so I'm not sure about that. But if you monitor through your mixer, there should be no latency of the source you are recording.
__________________
It's not what you know that is important...it's what you can figure out.

G4 1.25DP/FW800/1.25GB/OS X 10.3.5/Digi 001/LE 6.4
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-04-2004, 03:15 PM
auxsend1 auxsend1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 871
Default Re: Latency... Even with a Mixer?

You need to put the mix knob somewhere in between and be sure to mute the track that you're currently recording to. That's the trick.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-05-2004, 04:56 PM
Guerrilla Tech Guerrilla Tech is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 116
Default Re: Latency... Even with a Mixer?

You need to set up your signal path on your mixer so that you are sending your input signal to the MBox AND your stereo out. Mute the recorded channels in protools so that you don't hear them in your Mbox out channels. This way you are listening to the input to your MBox, before any latency happens.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to deal with Latency from Surround Mixer - Stereo Mixer. Spyderrp7 Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 9 11-02-2012 03:41 PM
Fader Latency on 003 Mixer Plobtron 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 7 11-05-2007 03:28 AM
Zero Latency w/Mixer yamlan 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 3 07-07-2007 03:36 AM
Mixer Connection and Latency mx_racer 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 8 05-04-2004 01:14 AM
Mixer eliminates latency? TRK 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 9 06-30-2001 05:10 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com