Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools 12
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-28-2017, 01:50 PM
Marsdy Marsdy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,201
Default Re: 12.7.1 Ouch !

Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightrambler View Post
Documentation proving this please. I haven't noticed any difference in operation between 10 and 11.
I know the feature was introduced with version 11. A quick google threw up this http://duc.avid.com/showthread.php?t=342106 so I would suggest you start searching the Avid site for 'what's new in version 11' docs.
__________________
Dave Marsden
UK
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-28-2017, 03:14 PM
midnightrambler midnightrambler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,873
Default Re: 12.7.1 Ouch !

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsdy View Post
I know the feature was introduced with version 11. A quick google threw up this http://duc.avid.com/showthread.php?t=342106 so I would suggest you start searching the Avid site for 'what's new in version 11' docs.
Yes sorry I've since done a search myself. Trouble is I've tended to work on a mix continually in input monitoring mode, as a really easy way to quickly do A-B comparisons with a ref track, old mixes, etc, by switching in and out of input. ("Live" mix vs "ref mix"). I've never once considered that Tools just might not be geared up for this and that I'm effectively always in the "lower" buffer size. Hmmm. I'll have to have a serious think on this. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-28-2017, 07:29 PM
25ghosts 25ghosts is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 3,333
Default Re: 12.7.1 Ouch !

Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightrambler View Post
Do you use VIs? Do you use a low H/W buffer so the MIDI doesn't end up recording out of time? Do you end up with the thing stopping halfway through a take? If not, you're a luckier man than I. And I say all this as a Pro Tools fanboy.
My contribution to this is this.

If (Protools Runs Audio Only)
{
rockSolid = True;
}
else if (ProTools Runs VIs and Use Midi) {
rockSolid = False;
setUseAnotherDAWToCompose = True;
}

If I launch PT to record a band or compose with the Acoustic Guitar and never use a VI or try to use a low Buffer - I could record the rest of my life without it crashing or dropping audio... The minute I even dare think of inserting a VI or lowering the Buffer - my day is ruined and that immediately ! And that since Protools 11.

I used to hate RTAS Performance with Protools Prior to 11. But it was never so bad that I was forced to use another DAW. PT11 and especially 12 made that choice a no brainer !
__________________
2016 MacBook Pro Retina | 16GB RAM | 1TB SSD | OS X Latest - PTHD 12 Latest | 4K LG Thunderbolt Display | Logic Pro 10
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-28-2017, 07:56 PM
Barry Johns Barry Johns is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,565
Default Re: 12.7.1 Ouch !

Quote:
Originally Posted by dankin View Post
What do you mean by "many VI".. do you have many installed, or do you use many at once in PT? Are you talking 3-4 VI's, 10-12, 20-30, or more? I'm always intrigued by any one who claims to use "many" VIs at once in any version of PT, who isn't also using something like VePro to offload them. I've just never seen what I would consider "many VIs" running at once with my on eyes on any PT rig. I've seen it (and do it myself) many times with Logic, Cubase and other daws, but with PT...I've yet to see it happen. Are these VIs just playing simple drum parts, or do you really get multiple VIs that are using decent amounts of polyphony all going at once?

What buffer settings are you at? Can you actually play these in realtime from a controller? No offense intended here. I'm truly curious about the handful of people on this board that claim to run "many" VIs with no issues in PT. While the rest of us have constant issues with 9173s and other errors. My 12 core Macpro will not run any where near what I would consider "many VIs" inside PT. I'm not even getting into the numerous midi bugs in PT, which is a whole other topic
Man, do your homework. The guy you are quoting is a serious player in the world of recording/production, working with A-List bands/artist. I'm pretty sure his sessions are pretty intense on all fronts.
__________________
HD Native Pcie, PTHD 11, PT12 Vanilla, Omni, Lynx Aurora 16, 192 I/O (16 in/8 out), 24 Fader D-Command, lots of preamps and compressors.

MacPro 5.1 (12) Core (2009 MacPro 8 Core Upgraded to a 12 Core MacPro), 56 Gig Ram, SSD System & 3 - 2TB Drives, OSX 10.9.5, Windows 10 Via Bootcamp
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-28-2017, 09:34 PM
dankin dankin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nashvillle
Posts: 515
Default Re: 12.7.1 Ouch !

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry Johns View Post
Man, do your homework. The guy you are quoting is a serious player in the world of recording/production, working with A-List bands/artist. I'm pretty sure his sessions are pretty intense on all fronts.
I wasn't attacking him...I was genuinely curious what kind of performance he was getting. Apparently the NMP fair much better than the 12core cheese graters. My 12core doesn't get that kind of VI performance with PT with out constant 9173s.
__________________
2022.12, OS 13, M1Max, 64gig of ram, Samsung t7 and T5 external drives, Apollo 16mkII, Apollo Twin MkII

Last edited by dankin; 04-28-2017 at 10:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-28-2017, 09:40 PM
dankin dankin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nashvillle
Posts: 515
Default Re: 12.7.1 Ouch !

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southsidemusic View Post
Ok, this new session we have up now are (and I counted) 29 VI and another 27 VI with only samples inside so 54 VI we run IRT that we tweak and change sounds until everything sound like we want it to.

I would consider that many VI for only use in the Computer and no external programs.

Buffer is never touched here as we are very happy tracking thru our SSL4000G+ into Apollo Quads and Apollo 16 Black X2. We use a 6 core nMP 2013 32GB Ramm and 512GB Flash hard drive and 3 external Samsung Pro 850 512GB in a thunderbolt chassie and another Samsung SSD 1TB for samples into the trashcan thunderbolt.

I think a 9173 error popped up once yesterday when i was drawing live automation on two tracks at the same time with a Slate Raven MTi2 but that was a HUGE session and we had all 42 43 VI up and non committed.

No rewire or VEP here either.
Thanks for the detailed response. I own VEP, but it's not currently installed on either of my systems. For me it's to much of a hastle unless you work from a large template.
__________________
2022.12, OS 13, M1Max, 64gig of ram, Samsung t7 and T5 external drives, Apollo 16mkII, Apollo Twin MkII
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-28-2017, 10:31 PM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,901
Default Re: 12.7.1 Ouch !

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southsidemusic View Post
PS. We don't use HDX anymore. The HDX2 system just sits in wait of sale.
Name your price, you might have potential customer lurking here
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-29-2017, 02:13 AM
Marsdy Marsdy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,201
Default Re: 12.7.1 Ouch !

Quote:
Originally Posted by midnightrambler View Post
Yes sorry I've since done a search myself. Trouble is I've tended to work on a mix continually in input monitoring mode, as a really easy way to quickly do A-B comparisons with a ref track, old mixes, etc, by switching in and out of input. ("Live" mix vs "ref mix"). I've never once considered that Tools just might not be geared up for this and that I'm effectively always in the "lower" buffer size. Hmmm. I'll have to have a serious think on this. Thanks.
Definitely worth a rethink I would think. You could be very pleasantly surprised!
__________________
Dave Marsden
UK
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-29-2017, 03:06 AM
Björklund Björklund is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2
Default Re: 12.7.1 Ouch !

Hi,
New forum user here. Just started using PT again after a 15 year break. Last time was with version 6 so version 12 feels almost like a new DAW to me.

Sorry if this is the wrong thread, but I'm having problems opening .exs-files into Structure Free. When trying PT 12.7.1 quits unexpectedly.
Known bug perhaps? Is there any work around?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-29-2017, 03:21 AM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,901
Default Re: 12.7.1 Ouch !

Hi, welcome to the community.

Perhaps asking around in the Virtual Instruments subforum? I've heard that there is an update available for Structure, but I don't use it myself so don't know for sure
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ouch-Cubase b mcgibney 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 9 11-15-2009 12:45 AM
NEW BUG!!! OUCH! mtung ICON & C|24 1 09-23-2005 04:21 AM
Ouch... ggunn 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 5 11-08-2004 08:23 AM
Ouch, bad Karma dog who 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 16 06-22-2002 10:23 PM
Just ordered an HD3 / 96 combo - OUCH! spong Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 2 01-17-2002 11:56 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com