|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mac 8core 2.8 gHz Harpertown 16-32 gig RAM vs. New 2.66 gHz Nehalem with 8-16 gig Ram
Hello to all:
I will be running Pro Tools V.8.0 on my mac-which apparently will either be a used 8-core 2.8 Harpertown machine (which I will upgrade to 16 or even 32 gig RAM), OR: a reconditioned 2.66 Nehalem quadcore machine, which as we all know, is limited (according to mac formalities ) to 8 Gig RAM. I know many people say that with aftermarket chips (which I'll be using anyway-so as not to grossly OVERPAY!), we can cram in double the apple spec, and get 16 gig of DDR3 RAM in the new quadcore. I plan to use BFD's latest version, a bit of soft synths, and plenty of compressors, eqs, F/X, and I'd like to Keep things flexible (in the MIDI realm) and not bounce to audio , so I know RAM is important....but the advantages of a newer quadcore vs the Harpertown 8 core can be blurred according to who you talk to...usually computer salespeople who don't know much about pro audio, and couldn't care less! They talk up what they have on hand to peddle... Only PT users are gonna' have real world answers. My Question is: Would you rather have a year-old 8-core Harpertown machine upgradeable to 32 GIG of DDR2 Ram, or the new 2.66 Nehalem machine, which may max out at 8 GIG of DDR3 (or even 16 GIG DDR3)? Thanks so much. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mac 8core 2.8 gHz Harpertown 16-32 gig RAM vs. New 2.66 gHz Nehalem with 8-16 gig
If you have money, I vote for the new one. Nehalem is faster, though both computer is beast.
Tamas Dragon
__________________
my blog:Tamas Dragon |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mac 8core 2.8 gHz Harpertown 16-32 gig RAM vs. New 2.66 gHz Nehalem with 8-16 gig
I'd be tempted to wait a couple of weeks as Snow Leopard is imminent.
Evidently this can access the CPU for basic tasks a lot quicker than Leopard which could have massive impact on the performance of ProTools. I've seen Snow Leopard running - flicking through photographs etc. and the re-draw is much much tighter than Leopard on the same machine. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mac 8core 2.8 gHz Harpertown 16-32 gig RAM vs. New 2.66 gHz Nehalem with 8-16 gig
Do you mean that you think a Nahelem single quadcore processore is likely to work better with Snow Leopard than an 8-core harpertown Xeon machine? I believe I could upgrade to snow leopard, backwards compatible to a year-old harpertown intel processor machine.. I think the cost of an upgrade is either free or affordable...what I want to find out is whether thr 1-yr old 8 core is better than the 6 month old quadcore nehalem.
What I am really asking everyone, is their opinion about two-to four times the the RAM capacity (albeit DDR2) in the harpertown 8-core-which is 32gig-versus the single quadcore nahalem-which, according to mac, will max out at only 8 GIG... and (may be upgradeable, while voiding Mac's warranty) to 16 gig. that's the critical question. Slightly an apples-to oranges comparisson, but I'm sure some one among us has real experience comparing Thanks. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mac 8core 2.8 gHz Harpertown 16-32 gig RAM vs. New 2.66 gHz Nehalem with 8-16 gig
I would rather have the new one with "only" 16gigs of ram.
I think it is better, and more future proof if we can say something like this in the computer world. Tamas Dragon
__________________
my blog:Tamas Dragon |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mac 8core 2.8 gHz Harpertown 16-32 gig RAM vs. New 2.66 gHz Nehalem with 8-16 gig
Quote:
__________________
Scott Formerly Hobo Wan Kenobi Core 2 Specs Page ASUS P6T6 Revolution | i7 930 | 12GB OCZ DDR3 1600 7-7-7-20 | PTLE 10 | CPTK | 003 | Presonus D8 | 11Rack | Alesis AI3 | Presonus HP60 | Mercury + Studio Classics | Sound Toys | MasseyPack | Axiom61 | MAudio Keystation Pro 88 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Mac 8core 2.8 gHz Harpertown 16-32 gig RAM vs. New 2.66 gHz Nehalem with 8-16 gig
Hey, I'm no big tech or anything, but in my amateur geek opinion, you are still better off with 8 processors to allocate to your plugins. even if it's against 4 better processors. The Nehalehem cores are not twice as good as the harpetown, so technically, you get more with the old 8 core. Remember though that until PT is 64bit compatible, 8, 16, or 32 gigs of ram won't make a difference...
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Used Harpertown 8-core or new Nehalem 4-core and why? | johnnyv | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 2 | 07-03-2010 12:07 AM |
Which Mac Pro to get...nehalem vs harpertown | tdblanchard | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 17 | 01-29-2010 01:32 PM |
Nehalem or Harpertown? | Compression Records | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 8 | 11-20-2009 01:42 AM |
2.28 Nehalem vs 2.8 harpertown on Snow Leopard and PT 8.01 | usastra | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 09-27-2009 06:16 PM |
Massey Plugs/Leopard/Harpertown 8core/7.4.1 compatible? | bbob | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 4 | 04-13-2008 08:43 AM |