|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Are HDX cards best way to get most power for PTHD
Are HDX cards best way to get most power for PTHD ? Have new MacBook Pro and want most powerful HDProTools 12.7 system I can using that computer , so are two HDX cards best option in Magma expansion chassis to use with the new MacBook Pro as I get rid of my 12 core old and long in the tooth Mac Pro trash can model over three years old ? Seems HDX cards kind of long in the tooth also but possible this is still best ? Any help with advice would be greatly appreciated , thanks in advance . Got a USB C to thunderbolt dongle to hook up the magma but will be going from 64 gig of ram in my old trash can MacPro to only 16 gig in my 2016 MacBook but more portable and don't have to always carry monitor in bags .
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are HDX cards best way to get most power for PTHD
What sort of power are you looking to improve? There is no way that your mac book will be more powerful than your 12 core mac pro. More portable but certainly not more powerful! Are you wanting more instruments? Or more voices? Until the new Mac Pro comes out, you have the most powerful game in town.
Steve
__________________
Steve Shepherd Extreme Mixing |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are HDX cards best way to get most power for PTHD
HDX is the best way to get very low latency and high simultaneous I/O count.
To mix large projects you need as many cores as you can get at the highest speed. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are HDX cards best way to get most power for PTHD
I second all of that. Plus, the comments about your Trashcan computer already being the most powerful are true too.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are HDX cards best way to get most power for PTHD
Quote:
It's pretty difficult to offer any comparable experience. The comments already provided are generally true - going from a Mac Pro (Trashcan or 2010/2012) to a MBP is a big downgrade in Native processing potential. If you are determined to do so, then yeah - adding DSP (HDX/UAD) is going to help provide more raw processing capability (and dual benefit of HDX is lower latency for recording). Separating out the Native Processing puzzle for a moment - DSP. There are various "faiths" represented on the DUC - some worship at the DSP altar, others protest the mere mention of DSP (this is an exaggeration of course - for illustrative purposes). For me - I look at the subject (on May 2,2017) much like I look at Graphics Cards today in computers. Today you have a choice of onboard graphics processing via Intel's chips set (native processing equivalent) or GPUs (DSP Processing). For me personally (on May 2, 2017), I cannot imagine - actually I could not complete - my current projects without 2 UAD Octos and 2 HDX cards in my 2012 Mac Pro 12 core (see sig). I max out my 2 HDX Cards, max out my Octos and hit 70%+ on my 12 core. So for me - I'm DSP all the way (and simultaneously - I have a second CPU processing linked in via VEP6 - MBP running an i7 at 2.7GHz 16GB Ram, etc) I do have friends who record and mix much simpler music, and they're fine with a 6core 2010 Mac Pro, running an Omni and PT HD - all native. Long roundabout way of illustrating the vastly different capabilities that your work demands of your HW choices. Answer some questions for yourself before you shed your TrashCan ... it may save you some cash and some headaches ...
__________________
T- ----- Waterstreet Studio Main: MacPro 2012 ([email protected]), 48GB, Apple/Samsung SSDs, WD Blacks. macOS 13.3 DSP & IO : Pro Tools HDX2(2018.3), 2x UAD Octo, HDIO 16x16 Analog IO(3), HDIO 16x16 Digital IO Plugins: Avid, DMG Audio, Kush, oeksound, P'n'T, Plugin Alliance, Softube, SoundTheory, Sonnox, Sound Radix, SoundToys, UAD, VEP, etc Hardware: API, Chandler, Hardy, Moog, Neve, Shadow Hills, Smart, Summit, TC Electronic M6000, UREI, etc Microphones: Telefunken, Neumann, Shure, AKG |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are HDX cards best way to get most power for PTHD
Quote:
Forrester. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are HDX cards best way to get most power for PTHD
External chassis like a Magma.
__________________
HD Native Pcie, PTHD 11, PT12 Vanilla, Omni, Lynx Aurora 16, 192 I/O (16 in/8 out), 24 Fader D-Command, lots of preamps and compressors. MacPro 5.1 (12) Core (2009 MacPro 8 Core Upgraded to a 12 Core MacPro), 56 Gig Ram, SSD System & 3 - 2TB Drives, OSX 10.9.5, Windows 10 Via Bootcamp |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: London UK PTHD Core and Accel PCI Cards | DigitalMetal | Buy & Sell | 3 | 10-17-2016 10:43 AM |
Question about selling PTHD license with TDM cards | KMcK | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 6 | 10-29-2011 01:53 PM |
What happens if I sell my HD cards after authorizing the serial # to download PTHD 9? | acmost | Pro Tools 9 | 2 | 11-10-2010 11:47 AM |
New Macs=current PTHD cards obsolete! | nwilliams | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 12 | 10-19-2005 09:38 PM |
multiple audio drivers/cards safe alongside ptHD? | southbound | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 09-07-2004 09:47 AM |