|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Digi 002 vs Command 8
Are the units the same when it comes to control? I know the 002 has all the more connections (Rack and control in 1), but does it work like the command 8 in the control dept? Any pros and cons? Thanks in advance!
Trep |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digi 002 vs Command 8
As far as the control goes, they're virtually identical.
These seem to be the primary advantages to each setup: Command|8 + 002r will give you an extra set of midi ports. 002 will give you standalone mixer functionality.
__________________
Cavell Studios |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digi 002 vs Command 8
Thanks for such a quick response Chris. Yea, I was a bit confused when reading over the specs deciding on my upgrade choice from the 001. It says standalone mixer for the 002, yet standalone midi controller for the command 8. The button layouts are a bit diff as well. The pics are not big enought to read the small print on the equipment. The more info the better, get at me everyone!
Thanks, Trep |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Digi 002 vs Command 8
Command 8 works on HD as well so if you have use an 002R and want to upgrade to HD, you still get to use the Command 8 for midi, monitoring and controls. With 002 you're stuck.
$command8 + $002R = $002
__________________
Cliff Stendel -iMac 5K 32g
-PT12. HDX -HD I/O 8x8x8. -HD Omni -Avid S3 -API 2500 -API 5500 -UA 2-1176 -UA 2-610 -Neve 1073, Chandler LTD-1 -Eventide H8000FW -Lexicon PCM96 -Bricasti M7. -Joe Meek channel. -Waves Mercury, Flux all, Softube All, Plugin Alliance all, McDSP all, Sonnox All, MH production, Wave Arts,a bunch more -Moog Voyager XL, Nord Piano, Hartmann Neuron, ARP Axxe, Gibson Les Paul, Mesa Boogie Roadster, Kemper, Taylor T5 and T5-12 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Digi 002 vs Command 8
The Command|8 also has a MUCH BETTER scribble strip. Channels get 6 characters instead of 4 (doesn't sound like much but makes a BIG difference) and it has two rows so you get more info when in insert mode. Just check out any pictures you can find and look at the scribble strip at the top and you will see what I mean. The command|8 will also work with other audio apps too. (and it looks a tad bit more elegant - for what that is worth).
002 would probably be a better choice if you needed a control surface AND portability though because of it's all-in-one design. My $.02 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
command 8 vs Digi 003 | dirtysoul | ProControl, Control|24, Command|8 | 6 | 04-03-2008 09:33 AM |
Using the Command 8 or the digi 002 with max/msp | toffee | ProControl, Control|24, Command|8 | 2 | 11-12-2006 02:05 PM |
Digi 002 vs command 8 | jimmyl | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 4 | 12-19-2005 10:57 AM |
digi 002 or command 8 | therockstar30 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 3 | 12-27-2004 04:21 PM |
Digi 001, Command 8 on a G4 OSX | mudnoc | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 12-02-2004 08:16 PM |