|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
888 compared to 192
Has anyone done a direct comparisent of the 888/24 IO and the 192 IO?
__________________
Powermac 9600/300 768mg ram OS 9.1.2, PTmix3 V5.1.3, 888/24, Adatbridge, 882/20, PSX-100, BigBen MacBookPro 1.8ghz 2gig ram OSX tiger, Mbox2 PT V.7 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 compared to 192
Ok no replies, let me stir it up a bit. I recently did a mix with my partner "lemix" and compared the d-19 20 bit converter to the 192, and the d-19 kills it, much warmer and better seperation. I currently am using a Mix plus system with the 888/24 IO and cant find a reason to upgrade to HD with the 192 that doesnt sound any better than a 10 year old 20bit converter. Further more , the 96k IO is reported to be the biggest peice of shyt that digi has ever released. (reports say). Can anyone comment on the quality of the 888, 192, and 96k IO.
Thanks
__________________
Powermac 9600/300 768mg ram OS 9.1.2, PTmix3 V5.1.3, 888/24, Adatbridge, 882/20, PSX-100, BigBen MacBookPro 1.8ghz 2gig ram OSX tiger, Mbox2 PT V.7 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 compared to 192
Don't sugar coat it, say what you really mean.
The best reason to upgrade is to stay current on the software and to have access to new products that are only designed for HD and Accel. If you're still happy with your mix system, then keep it. I still have mine, but I feel that things are starting to change. I don't really know when I'll make the move, but I plan on putting it off as long as I can. It's like buying a car. You come out better if you can drive it for a few years after the loan is paid off, but when it's time to trade, it's time to trade. Steve
__________________
Steve Shepherd Extreme Mixing |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 compared to 192
Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 compared to 192
"I currently am using a Mix plus system with the 888/24 IO and cant find a reason to upgrade to HD "
HD as a system sounds A LOT better than MIx, according to most folks. A converter comparision is only half the battle... For the record, I'm extremely happy with my 192's... S..
__________________
"it's not about making the changes, it's about playing ideas in time" Scofield... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 compared to 192
I did a project for a clinet 2 years ago on Mix. (The client is not picky at all just fast in & out demos) They recently did another small project - now with HD. The guy is 65 years old and could hear the improvement between HD and Mix.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: 888 compared to 192
The difference between an 888 and a 192 is obvious to almost any listener. The 192 is definately MUCH better sounding in every way, even at 44.1.
__________________
Will Russell Electric Wilburland Studio https://linktr.ee/wilburland M1MAX Mac Studio OS 14.4.1, PT2024.3, HDX, S1/Dock M1 PRO MacBook Pro OS 14.4.1, PT2024.3, BabyFacePro FS |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 compared to 192
But if you're using Apogees or the like in your Mix system, I wonder how much of a difference one would hear...?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 compared to 192
Thats cool all, the only thing is, I havent heard anyone say they did a direct comparisent with the same source at the same time with the same mics etc and tell me the pros and cons off either I/O. Thanks guys, I hope I am not coming across as a dick, I am smilling while writting this.I am also considering getting a clock generator and see if there is an improvement in sound. So you can see my dilemna. Do I spend $7000 for an 192 I/O that will improve the sound 40%, or do I spend $2000 for a good clock and improve the sound 20%.
__________________
Powermac 9600/300 768mg ram OS 9.1.2, PTmix3 V5.1.3, 888/24, Adatbridge, 882/20, PSX-100, BigBen MacBookPro 1.8ghz 2gig ram OSX tiger, Mbox2 PT V.7 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 888 compared to 192
I have A/B'd them, using the same mics, speakers, preamps, instruments/singer and so on. The sound quality of the 192 is in itself a good argument for upgrading to HD. Better stereo imaging, more depth, more natural overtones, less dull, less harsh, 192 sounds more 'expensive' etc etc etc. More presence. I compared the 888|24 with 192, both @ 44.1.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
M Micro D/A compared | bderkach | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 3 | 07-26-2010 08:38 PM |
MDW V3.0 compared to V2... | acacia | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 3 | 09-29-2008 05:47 PM |
10.4.2 as compared to 10.4.9 | Muzoid | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 05-29-2007 04:20 AM |
PT LE COMPARED TO... | mykhal c | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 2 | 01-10-2007 09:29 PM |
Anyone compared X-Form? | minister | Post - Surround - Video | 4 | 10-10-2006 01:52 PM |