|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Project Mix Pre:s vs. 002 Pre:s?
Hello,
it looks like we need another DAW for mostly tracking purposes. Acoustic drums, the whole band , percussion, ac guitars, silence etc. I think I´ll give M-Powered a try but how on earth do I find any objective info about the M-Audio (Project Mix) preamp quality? How would you compare the preamps against ,say, a 002? I think that´s a fair comparision and I know 002 inside out. Or Mbox2? Or Presonus Digimax? All those are ok references. High end aside for now. 002 pres are acceptable for lots of things I do... but just like with all cheap pres/convertors, the problem multiplies with more channels. Ever tried recording 36 tracks of triangles on a 002? That´s what I mean. Try the same with a quality converter / pre and the same mic. Anyway, I´d greatly appreciate some experience-based info on the M-Audio Project Mix preamps. Are those just toys or real tools for a working musician? Hard to tell these days, nothing is worse than a bad front end anyway. But good stuff is being made for less money these days... as is bad. Thanks.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------- - i7 520 @ 3.6 GHz / P6T / XP32 / PTLE 8.01 . PT9 on Snow . - PTLE8 on a macbook. - And a bunch of miscellaneous obsolete hardware from the past. Like Mix ++++ 64 i/o with Control/24 I`m In The Band: www.ozofficial.com My guitars are in tune : http://www.truetemperament.com/site/index.php |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Project Mix Pre:s vs. 002 Pre:s?
If I were you, I would buy a PM ... and perform some back to back tests. You could perform this test with the M-Powered demo and return the PM if you determine it to stink.
In my opinion, the Pre's aren't bad. But it's all subjective .. I'm sure there's quite a few that would argue the 002 pre-amps are toys! lol Doug |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Project Mix Pre:s vs. 002 Pre:s?
Thanks for the reply, Doug.
All this new M-Powered thingy looks very good to me. Anyone else with both Digi and M-Audio systems care to comment?
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------- - i7 520 @ 3.6 GHz / P6T / XP32 / PTLE 8.01 . PT9 on Snow . - PTLE8 on a macbook. - And a bunch of miscellaneous obsolete hardware from the past. Like Mix ++++ 64 i/o with Control/24 I`m In The Band: www.ozofficial.com My guitars are in tune : http://www.truetemperament.com/site/index.php |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Project Mix Pre:s vs. 002 Pre:s?
I recently bought a PM and owned an Mbox for years. The sound of the pre's are ...decent. Are they worth the $900. definitely. I think they are on par with the Mbox with the focusrite pre's. I don't have much experience with the digi 002. Ya know, every year the quality gets better and better with lower cost gear. Technology improving. I think M-audio saved money on their box by having only work as a software mixer, not a stand alone type. You can't take it to a gig and run it by itself. It only works with the M-audio software, so it takes a little change in the thinking. I posted a song on another post that I recorded strictly with the PM pre's. Check it out at www.trucksandbeer.com se what you think of the pre's. (recorded with decent available mics,.. 57, sennheiser, rode..blah,blah,blah
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
making a project sound like a project | skwad | Tips & Tricks | 2 | 01-25-2007 05:54 AM |
002 project | Joz | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 20 | 03-29-2004 08:12 PM |
Case/Project box for MBox Project? | RMcFarland | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 15 | 02-23-2004 05:31 PM |
PCI Project on G4 ? | Chrislafon | Digidesign Hardware & Software | 0 | 10-02-2002 12:20 AM |
Project vs Project II | houseofrecords | Digidesign Hardware & Software | 2 | 06-18-2002 02:21 PM |