|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Recording to two PT HD systems
Hi,
I want to record the 48 channels from Stage Rack to two ProTools recording systems (for backup). Is there some way to do this with 2 x HDx cards? Is there another way to do this? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Recording to two PT HD systems
If you're thinking about drive problems, a RAID drive setup would increase data safety and cost much less than another HD system. If one drive dies the others take over... I do this in all my office servers. But the ultimate would be a mirror system. The big question even with a mirror system would be whether an error in one PT system propogates an error that takes the other one down with it.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Recording to two PT HD systems
Thanks TwoPort,
This is for a certain project for which I have access to two PT recording systems and I also have two HDx cards. I want to know whether there is a way to split the digital signal (first 48 inputs) into two HDx cards, each card would then feed a different PT recording system. Another idea I had is - if I configure the Venue to a 96 ch system - then I will patch the first 48 inputs to channels 1-48 AND to 49-96. Would I then be able to record channels 49-96 (which have the same signal as ch 1-48) through the second HDx card? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Recording to two PT HD systems
Quote:
That's my theoretic two cents.
__________________
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Marc Bowyer, Sr. Audio Director, Grace Church STL Engineer/Producer, StrobeAlific Media St. Louis, MO |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Recording to two PT HD systems
I just checked the HDx Option Guide. According to the "D-Show Signal Routing for HDx Recording" the pickoff point of the HDx card is before the D-Show patchbay. In that case I will not be able to split inputs 1-48 to two HDx cards.
Another possibility I am thinking of is doing a physical split inside the FOH rack. My idea is taken from the analog world, I don't know if it works digitally. Here it is - in a standard 96 ch VENUE to PT recording the first HDx card is connected to the first DSP card (with a small ribbon cable). The second HDx card is connected to the second DSP card. Maybe I could manufacture a ribbon cable that will take the digital signal from DSP1 card to both HDx cards? This is similar to the buss cables in analog consoles. Is that possible? I have manufactured such a (much larger) cable for my Crest analog console. Sheldon / Steve ???? do you have the answer? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Recording to two PT HD systems
May I ask, WHY you need to do this?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Recording to two PT HD systems - Oops
"Known Issues
* Pro Tools does not support RAID technology. Please do not activate this feature on any Pro Tools recording drives." -- Well looks like RAID might be a bad idea after all. Sorry for the erroneous post.. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Recording to two PT HD systems
Thank you all,
Your replies are very helpful. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Pro Tools Mbox Personal Recording Systems | Avid | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 76 | 02-15-2013 01:58 PM |
New Pro Tools Mbox Personal Recording Systems | Avid | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 140 | 02-02-2013 02:11 PM |
echo when recording mostly on intel systems | Litemup | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 11-11-2008 10:22 PM |
OT: best way to feed 2 recording systems? | mgbasinski | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 1 | 05-14-2007 07:21 AM |
Lowest recording latency on mixerless non-TDM systems? 6 ms? | undertone | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 0 | 12-31-2002 04:27 AM |