Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Software > AAX Plug-ins
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-06-2020, 01:12 PM
VedCarpet VedCarpet is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Malmo Sweden
Posts: 1
Default Maxim weird behaviour

Was trying to "home master" some tracks using Maxim limiter plugin, but noticed that it showed different values all the time. If I played a section with a peak or transient, it sometimes said it was attenuating 4 bd, sometimes 2 db, sometimes not at all. Seems like the meters can't be trusted at all so I can't know what's actually going on, how much the limiter is working etc... I can use another plugin, but just thought it was very weird for a plugin that comes with Pro tools. Is this a bug? Or is it just not meant to be very accurate...? Of course could sometimes be very fast transients but I tried it with a lot of different sounds...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-06-2020, 04:30 PM
Sardi Sardi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 2,994
Default Re: Maxim weird behaviour

IMHO, Maxim is a terrible plugin. Not even worth loading into an insert slot. Hehe...

There’s plenty of very good and inexpensive limiter plugins out there. Save yourself the frustration.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-07-2020, 10:19 AM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,901
Default Re: Maxim weird behaviour

Was good in last millenium
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-07-2020, 04:13 PM
Sardi Sardi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 2,994
Default Re: Maxim weird behaviour

Quote:
Originally Posted by JFreak View Post
Was good in last millenium

Not even. Haha!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-07-2020, 05:24 PM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,901
Default Re: Maxim weird behaviour

Good enough to sell for 495

With that said, today it looks so wrong that DSP plugins were so expensive. Like who in their right mind paid 395 for D-FI or 595 for Focusrite d2/d3, or 395 for SansAmp or 595 for Smack!
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-08-2020, 05:40 PM
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
Bob Olhsson Bob Olhsson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,519
Default Re: Maxim weird behaviour

Those old plug-ins had to be coded using assembly language which requires a great deal of both know-how and time.
__________________
Bob's room 615 562-4346
Interview
Artists are the gatekeepers of truth! - Paul Robeson
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-08-2020, 05:46 PM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,901
Default Re: Maxim weird behaviour

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Olhsson View Post
Those old plug-ins had to be coded using assembly language which requires a great deal of both know-how and time.
Sure they did, which is why I don't understand why there are so few AAX-DSP plugins available. Waves being the most notorious company lacking support, but as you said now that DSP plugs can be coded with C language, the coding know-how is not hard to find. Dealing with DSP limitations in most of the case should be trivial too, so long as the plugin vendor wants to take the extra time to do it (and while doing it they would also optimize their native version). Obviously the fixed amount of memory available for a chip makes coding DSP reverbs hard and DSP virtual instruments practically impossible, but you never know before you try. Right?

Just pointed out the (now) outrageous old DSP prices as an opportunity practically wasted by Waves. They were the ones to drop DSP support and drop the double-pricing for DSP plugins. So now if someone wants to code for DSP needs to sell the plug for same price as native. No more extra 100% price for DSP version.
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-08-2020, 06:05 PM
Bob Olhsson's Avatar
Bob Olhsson Bob Olhsson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,519
Default Re: Maxim weird behaviour

The problem for the plug-in developers is that the majority of plug-ins sold are VST which means that most need to code AAX separately if they want to provide DSP support. There are frameworks readily available that allow using just one set of instructions for all native formats. Plug-in Alliance created its own framework that does DSP along with the native formats but Avid's framework (which I understand is free!) only does AAX. Waves did the math and figured out they simply couldn't afford to port everything to AAX-DSP.
__________________
Bob's room 615 562-4346
Interview
Artists are the gatekeepers of truth! - Paul Robeson
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-08-2020, 06:10 PM
JFreak's Avatar
JFreak JFreak is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 24,901
Default Re: Maxim weird behaviour

AFAIK the development kit provided by Avid is capable of producing DSP version, but as I said earlier you cannot overcome DSP limitions so you need to tune the software to fit into the chip.

Waves reportedly had AAXDSP available but they decided not to sell them because "they did not see enough performance gain" compared to previous DSP generation. While majority of their users would have been happy with 100% same performance level, they decided to screw their users. We all know their SG was the reason, but I don't care anymore -- no more Waves here, except the old HD3 system I keep for live recordings...

Dont know about PA things. Maybe they mostly use Avid's or not. Whatever the case, they have impressive number of DSP plugins available even though it isn't as simple as ticking a box.
__________________
Janne
What we do in life, echoes in eternity.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2020, 06:14 PM
Sardi Sardi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 2,994
Default Re: Maxim weird behaviour

That’s not what I recall about Waves.

IIRC, they stated that the ROI wasn’t worth it to code AAX DSP. I don’t believe they spent the time to code all their library of plugins to then not release them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5.0 aux weird behaviour paulo m Post - Surround - Video 1 08-31-2019 11:03 AM
markers weird behaviour AchimHamburg Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) 0 02-14-2011 06:16 AM
weird behaviour lightning ad Post - Surround - Video 2 05-03-2005 06:59 AM
allnotes off very weird behaviour shaun1234 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 1 10-19-2004 07:27 PM
Weird L1 behaviour... Mr T 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 0 08-02-2002 03:53 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:49 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com