Windows 98 PT Performance vs. Windows ME - Avid Pro Audio Community

12-04-2001, 04:21 PM

executivos executivos is offline

Member

Join Date: May 2001

Location: Pasadena, Ca

Posts: 356

Re: Windows 98 PT Performance vs. Windows ME

honestly at first I hated winme. I'm not sure why. Oh yeah...it sucked. (jk) I was unsing win98 and read a thread about people adding more ram to win98 and it actually slowed down. Then I read that changing to winme helped a bit because it has better memory management.

So.............

I'm using winme and it's fine..I think there was a slight difference but not THAT much. What I like about it is that the os/registry seems to stay quick and clean much longer than in win98. Win98 is great for a few months until all of your programs are installed. Then it's slow as hell.

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Windows 7 vs. Windows XP - PT 8 compatibility and performance.	MadHouseLaboratories	003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win)	4	08-19-2010 10:52 PM
Windows Guide - Windows 7 Optimizations and Troubleshooting.[349411]	cwsand	003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win)	9	08-12-2010 01:46 PM
Is standalone Windows Audio Drivers v8.0.3 compatible with WINDOWS XP 64 ?	VonHelvete	003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win)	6	03-28-2010 10:01 AM
Windows xp vs mac os x performance	OrakleMusik	Tips & Tricks	4	12-04-2008 08:22 PM
Windows server 2003+windows resource manager.	odysseys	003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win)	1	06-20-2003 10:02 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:12 AM.