Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Pro Tools Software > Tips & Tricks
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-10-2000, 10:12 PM
meshtheflesh meshtheflesh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Singapore
Posts: 233
Default Hardware Sample Rate Conveters

I run a music and sound design Studio. we are running at 44.1 for the reasons of CD burning/extracting and the 48k Quicktime bug. But the Video Post houses are running 48k, and they have been butchering our re-stipes. We have decided we need to give them 48k Dats, but we don't want to switch our systems back to 48k. Can any one recommend a hardware sample rate converter. And has any one done any listening tests between just going analog, and using s/r converters?

[This message has been edited by meshtheflesh (edited February 11, 2000).]
__________________
----------------------------
Ramesh Sathiah
www.songzu.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-11-2000, 04:24 AM
Jules Jules is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,565
Default Re: Hardware Sample Rate Conveters

I too wonder, I'm doing music (rock) sessions all in PT, I have the following at my disposal.

TC Finalizer (96k)
Apgee AD8000

NB, I monitor via both

Any point in me running at 48k the whole time? I need to make a 44.1 DAT master at the end of each session. I am running at 44.1 for no particular reason at present.

TIA

Jules

[This message has been edited by Jules (edited February 11, 2000).]
__________________
Jules
London, UK
Come hang with us here!
www.gearslutz.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-11-2000, 06:24 AM
LarsRec LarsRec is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Posts: 73
Default Re: Hardware Sample Rate Conveters

To my ears the Z-system boxes are your best bet in a reasonable price range if you want to remain in the digital domain. Even their little $300 box sounds good.
You could also use a high quality D/A and back to digital at your new sample rate.
__________________
JKL
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-11-2000, 09:20 AM
editor editor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,120
Default Re: Hardware Sample Rate Conveters

As a mastering engineer, I find that any sample rate conversion is.......sort of grainy. Tracking at 48k and mixing analog to a 44.1 dat is ok, if you have decent convertors, although, there really isn't that much of a difference (I am sure some will argue that point). For me I like to get my dats from the clients already at 44.1. Any A to D conversion represents another generation away from the original, even if it seems to be a sweet conversion, it is still a conversion.....generation loss.

e

PS; Good name for a band "generation loss"



__________________
Partial list of album credits/editor.
http://members.dslextreme.com/users/apple/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-11-2000, 02:30 PM
Jonny Atack Jonny Atack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 311
Default Re: Hardware Sample Rate Conveters

FWIW, the difference between the converters of an Apogee and, say, a Sony PCM500 is not subtle. I always avoid the DAT's converters -- go through your 888/Apogee/Prism and then via AES to DAT.

If you do it analog, that's a good opportunity to add your stereo eq and comp thang if needed.
__________________
www.capitolstudiosparis.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-11-2000, 02:52 PM
editor editor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 1,120
Default Re: Hardware Sample Rate Conveters

To clarify, there is a huge difference between convertors. The difference between 48 and 44.1 is there but not that hairy...most of the time........there is that 1% of the time that 48k is actually there and an issue.

I always capture digital in, AES/EBU jacks, master the file and spit it back out digital to CDR disc image etc. If I have to capture analog, I use the manley or appogee convertors. It is still however not an exact duplicate of the master.....IT HAS BEEN RESAMPLED........sometimes a file benefits greatly from the resample process.

In the case of MESHTHEFLESCH's question, use the appogees with UV22 and go in to them analog, spit out digital 48k masters from your 44.1 tapes, to me all RT SR convertors are still in the "a bit harsh zone"

Just my opinion

I respect all you guys input.
__________________
Partial list of album credits/editor.
http://members.dslextreme.com/users/apple/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-12-2000, 01:58 PM
Jules Jules is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,565
Default Re: Hardware Sample Rate Conveters

Err? What?
Jules
__________________
Jules
London, UK
Come hang with us here!
www.gearslutz.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-13-2000, 12:13 AM
Jonny Atack Jonny Atack is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 311
Default Re: Hardware Sample Rate Conveters

Yup, second that. Go out to analog with Apogees and back to digital at your new SR via Apogee with Soft Limiting on and with UV22 on if it's 16 bits, off if 24. Sometimes the audio even sounds better after this process depending on what analog gear the signal is running through.
__________________
www.capitolstudiosparis.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-13-2000, 02:09 AM
meshtheflesh meshtheflesh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Singapore
Posts: 233
Default Re: Hardware Sample Rate Conveters

Hang on, I only have one Ad800, and it can only have one sample rate for all the inputs and outputs right?, so i would have to go out of my Apogees analog , into my SONY PCM 7040 at 48k. Does anyone have an opinion about the 7040 convertors?

cheers
Ramesh

PS We are doing TVCs , and the option of mixing to dat at 44.1, the playing it back in through the ad8000 aat48k, and then back to the dat master is to slow an option, as is using the PT s/r conversion. Anyone who does music/post would know thats the last thing you want be doing at the end of a session, with the clients waiting for a DAT for restripe.

[This message has been edited by meshtheflesh (edited February 13, 2000).]
__________________
----------------------------
Ramesh Sathiah
www.songzu.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-13-2000, 06:03 AM
Jules Jules is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,565
Default Re: Hardware Sample Rate Conveters

Say if you had 2 x AD8000's ??

are they good sample rate converters? Whats the best? Anyone want to do a top 5 ?!!!

Jules
__________________
Jules
London, UK
Come hang with us here!
www.gearslutz.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sample rate setting on hardware gets forced to 44.1 by PT8 Ludia Pro Tools M-Powered (Win) 6 12-26-2012 09:09 PM
Focusrite Saffire 56 Sample Rate Problems - Sample rates changing during start up finalcut Windows 12 02-20-2012 04:00 AM
Sample Rate in Hardware Setup protollo 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 3 11-06-2009 02:48 PM
MBox Micro Sample Max Sample Rate Only 48 kHz? Joe Sciacca 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 7 09-07-2008 12:52 PM
Bit Rate/Sample Rate problem? The chipmunks? bspro 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) 2 03-17-2008 05:40 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:35 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com