|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sample accurate digilink interfaces in 2019?
Hey everyone,
What current digilink interfaces are sample accurate to 192s or HD I/O? Obviously Avid stuff. I assume the Symphony and new Aurora N continue Apogee and Lynx's trend of being sample accurate? Mytek? What about Burl, the Focusrite Red stuff and Antelope Audio HD interfaces?
__________________
Pro Tools Ultimate 2024.3. OSX 13.6.5. Win 10. HD Native. Lynx AES16e. Lynx Aurora 16. i9-13900KF. ASRock Z690 Steel Legend. 64GB Ram. AMD Vega 64. BM Decklink. Dolby Atmos Renderer 5.2. Trinnov D-Mon. D-Command. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Sample accurate digilink interfaces in 2019?
What does sample accurate mean?
__________________
Justice C. Bigler www.justicebigler.com Lenovo P50: quad-core i7-6820hq, 64GB, 2TB SSD, Win 10 Pro / Protools Ultimate 2023.6 / HD|Native-TB 2018 MacBook Pro: six-core i9, 32GB, 1TB, Monterey / Protools Studio 2023.6, / DVS / DAR, L-ISA Studio Home/mobile: Focusrite Red 8Pre+HD32R / Clarett 4Pre Road/hotel: Roland OctaCaputre / Apogee One |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sample accurate digilink interfaces in 2019?
HD Native & HDX have preconfigured delay compensation for Digidesign and HD I/O interfaces. When you throw an analogue insert into a mix, the resulting audio should still be sample accurate so that it doesn't cause phase issues with the rest of the mix - think parallel compression with a hardware compressor.
Lynx, for example, mimicked the roundtrip AD/DA latency of the Digidesign 192 with their Aurora's. So it was literally a drop-in replacement for 192's or HD I/Os.
__________________
Pro Tools Ultimate 2024.3. OSX 13.6.5. Win 10. HD Native. Lynx AES16e. Lynx Aurora 16. i9-13900KF. ASRock Z690 Steel Legend. 64GB Ram. AMD Vega 64. BM Decklink. Dolby Atmos Renderer 5.2. Trinnov D-Mon. D-Command. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Sample accurate digilink interfaces in 2019?
So what makes them sample accurate and how do you know if they are?
The Focusrite Red4/8Pre and 16 Line interfaces have a Loop Sync port, in addition to their word clock.
__________________
Justice C. Bigler www.justicebigler.com Lenovo P50: quad-core i7-6820hq, 64GB, 2TB SSD, Win 10 Pro / Protools Ultimate 2023.6 / HD|Native-TB 2018 MacBook Pro: six-core i9, 32GB, 1TB, Monterey / Protools Studio 2023.6, / DVS / DAR, L-ISA Studio Home/mobile: Focusrite Red 8Pre+HD32R / Clarett 4Pre Road/hotel: Roland OctaCaputre / Apogee One |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sample accurate digilink interfaces in 2019?
I'm running a Merging HORUS interface, and it has many io options, including AES, MADI, and of course Analogue AD/DA. When connected via DigiLink, you can tell it to emulate either HD-Madi, HD-io, or 192-io, which will show up in ProTools as the intended device, and also emulate sample-accurate io delays as well.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sample accurate digilink interfaces in 2019?
Quote:
If a digilink interface has an internal latency of 40 samples, then the audio that returns from your analogue insert will be 23 samples late (40-17=23). You can get it more accurate by fiddling with the I/O offset menu, but even then I think you are limited to an accurate of +/-3 samples because it uses a tenth of a millisecond as the smallest value. I don't actually have any idea what the latency of each device is, so take the figures with a grain of salt. They are just an example of how Pro Tools compensates for latency. Other DAWs use a ping feature to quickly obtain sample accurate inserts. Pro Tools doesn't... finding a digilink interface that mimics the internal latency of an Avid interface is the quickest way to deal with it. I assume you can test your interface by doing the I/O Offset measurement outlined in the Pro Tools manual. If you are running a HD rig, a result of 0 samples would probably mean you have an interface that is sample accurate to HD I/O (or whatever the device is that appears in your hardware settings).
__________________
Pro Tools Ultimate 2024.3. OSX 13.6.5. Win 10. HD Native. Lynx AES16e. Lynx Aurora 16. i9-13900KF. ASRock Z690 Steel Legend. 64GB Ram. AMD Vega 64. BM Decklink. Dolby Atmos Renderer 5.2. Trinnov D-Mon. D-Command. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sample accurate digilink interfaces in 2019?
Quote:
Jeepers! That is the way to do it, and great to know.
__________________
Pro Tools Ultimate 2024.3. OSX 13.6.5. Win 10. HD Native. Lynx AES16e. Lynx Aurora 16. i9-13900KF. ASRock Z690 Steel Legend. 64GB Ram. AMD Vega 64. BM Decklink. Dolby Atmos Renderer 5.2. Trinnov D-Mon. D-Command. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Sample accurate digilink interfaces in 2019?
It's just a matter of knowing how many samples to compensate (i/o setup); for example, Apogee manuals have charts available -- but sure, it would be easier if someone else did it for you
__________________
Janne What we do in life, echoes in eternity. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sample accurate digilink interfaces in 2019?
Quote:
Sure, but that is the equivalent of turning my $6000 HDX system into a $100 Coreaudio interface. Pro Tools HDX by design takes care of it automatically. I just want to know what third party digilink interfaces and their manufacturers have the foresight to maintain the integrity of HDX, in this regard. The I/O Offset menu was truly sucky in 2010. It's even worse in 2019. I just don't want to have to deal with millisecond offsets and their ever so slightly less-than-perfect maths on an expensive DAW... particularly when DAWs like Reaper, Cubase and Ableton Live can all deal with it quickly and efficiently. I haven't used Apogee interfaces since the 16X series. I know you needed to enter manual offsets then. Is it still the case with the Symphony and Symphony MKII?
__________________
Pro Tools Ultimate 2024.3. OSX 13.6.5. Win 10. HD Native. Lynx AES16e. Lynx Aurora 16. i9-13900KF. ASRock Z690 Steel Legend. 64GB Ram. AMD Vega 64. BM Decklink. Dolby Atmos Renderer 5.2. Trinnov D-Mon. D-Command. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sample accurate digilink interfaces in 2019?
Quote:
(and having that compensation being correct when changing session sample rates.) Not the same thing.
__________________
Pro Tools Ult 2024.3.1, HDX 2, MTRX/SPQ, RME BBF Pro + MADIface Pro • S1 x 2, Fire Max11 x 2, Dock, iPad Air5 • Mac Mini 14,12, 12 core, macOS 13.6.6 • RAM 32GB, SSD 4TB, GPU 19 core • QNAP TVS-872XT 148TB TB3 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
List of third-party Digilink interfaces? | Matt Hepworth | Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) | 14 | 11-19-2023 02:49 PM |
Interfaces under Inputs say DigiLink N/A. What's going on? [solved] | Focuret | Pro Tools HDX & HD Native Systems (Mac) | 0 | 03-17-2018 10:23 AM |
Sample accurate recording | derekvh | Post - Surround - Video | 2 | 02-03-2014 08:55 PM |
AC3, is it Sample Accurate? | minister | Post - Surround - Video | 13 | 03-13-2007 10:57 AM |
Sample accurate midi? | Dopamine | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 0 | 02-09-2005 11:48 PM |