Avid Pro Audio Community

Avid Pro Audio Community

How to Join & Post  •  Community Terms of Use  •  Help Us Help You

Knowledge Base Search  •  Community Search  •  Learn & Support


Avid Home Page

Go Back   Avid Pro Audio Community > Legacy Products > Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac)
Register FAQ Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-03-2008, 01:15 PM
reichman's Avatar
reichman reichman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 2,412
Default PT 7.3 vs. PT 7.4 PPC performance?

Hello DUC:

As my computer reboots during the PT 7.3.1cs6 upgrade, I thought I'd ask the brave 7.4 users out there whether there is an overall performance hit going to 7.4 from 7.3. My understanding is that Elastic Time is more disk intensive, but if you leave it off, are all the editing and playback functions of PT just as snappy as they were in 7.3? Since I have a dual 2.7Ghz G5, I'm more interested in hearing from other PPC users.

Thanks in advance,

Nathaniel Reichman
www.nathanielreichman.com
__________________
Nathaniel Reichman
Producer/Re-recording Mixer - New York
Nathaniel Reichman | IMDB | LinkedIn
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-03-2008, 02:25 PM
Ramtitam Ramtitam is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 235
Default Re: PT 7.3 vs. PT 7.4 PPC performance?

I have a G52x2,3 PCI-x and a G5 4x2,5 PCI-e. They both have 4gb ram and OS 10.4.11 (I think) Upgraded both to 7.4 and I have elastic time turned on. I was expecting it to slow down my systems, but I don't think it's necessary to turn elastic time off. I haven't noticed that performance has been reduced at all. I haven't made any measuring, it's just my feeling.
__________________
Mac Pro 8 core Nehalem 2x2.26 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon, 15 GB ram, HD2 Accel, 192 I/O, PT 10, Mac OS 10.6.8. Dedicated internal drives for system and sample libraries. Recording few tracks on a network Synology NAS. More tracks on a Western Digital external FW800 drive. VI's from NI (Komplete 7), Toontrack, Spectrasonics, IK Multimedia, Vienna, MOTU (BPM), Ivory and a bunch of other plugs.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-03-2008, 04:53 PM
2fly 2fly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 296
Default Re: PT 7.3 vs. PT 7.4 PPC performance?

If anything on my system it seems to be better than 7.3 ever was. It's certainly more stable for me and it's way more fun to use!
__________________
Alan
http://www.2flystudios.com
G5 2.5ppc, 4gb ram, OSX 10.5.8, PT8.0.1cs4
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-03-2008, 05:17 PM
reichman's Avatar
reichman reichman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 2,412
Default Re: PT 7.3 vs. PT 7.4 PPC performance?

Thanks guys. This is really good info. I've been holding off because everything in 7.3.1cs5 has been so smooth. Maybe I'll make the leap to 7.4 now.
__________________
Nathaniel Reichman
Producer/Re-recording Mixer - New York
Nathaniel Reichman | IMDB | LinkedIn
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-04-2008, 04:51 AM
TCDet TCDet is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Detroit
Posts: 903
Default Re: PT 7.3 vs. PT 7.4 PPC performance?

PPC Dual 2.7 here. 7.4cs2 Working well.
• EA live√
• EA rendered a bit of a slowdown in work flow.
• Committing a long section will be faster to re-record over to new tracks than commit. Then make inactive the EA tracks.
8 Drum tracks for a 9 min. Song took more than a half hour to commit!
Busing and recording took 12 min.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-04-2008, 07:03 PM
RobMacki RobMacki is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jefferson State, USA
Posts: 2,968
Default Re: PT 7.3 vs. PT 7.4 PPC performance?

I went from 7.2 straight to 7.4.
I thought 7.2 was snappy and extremely stable.
So far I haven't noticed a difference in performance.


PT 7.4cs2
PPC G5 dual 2
OS 10.4.11
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-04-2008, 08:56 PM
gives's Avatar
gives gives is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,846
Default Re: PT 7.3 vs. PT 7.4 PPC performance?

Quote:
I went from 7.2 straight to 7.4.
I thought 7.2 was snappy and extremely stable.
So far I haven't noticed a difference in performance.


PT 7.4cs2
PPC G5 dual 2
OS 10.4.11
HI Rob.. 7.4 is real zippy for me also with a G5 Dual 2.5GHZ PPC. OS 10.4.9

G
__________________
Composer/Sound Designer/Protools 2024.3 Ultimate, MTRXII-TB3, DADMAN MOM, Cisco SG350-10MP EthernetHUB, KLANG:quelle 4 Channel Dante™Headphone Amp, DVS,MADI, Mac Studio Ultra,128 RAM/4TB SSD, Ventura 13.6.6, DP 11.3.1, Logic Pro X 10.8.1 DOLBY ATMOS Facility/MPSE Motion Picture Sound Editors Avid Certified Professional ProTools/Dolby ATMOS
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-04-2008, 09:21 PM
jonlocker jonlocker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4
Default Re: PT 7.3 vs. PT 7.4 PPC performance?

one problem i've been having that i can't seem to find is, when i hit 3 to record, the record and play buttons blink and it waits like 5 seconds then starts just fine. If i hit play then record (in quick punch) it starts immediately. I feel like i'm just being dumb and can't find something i clicked somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-04-2008, 09:22 PM
jonlocker jonlocker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4
Default Re: PT 7.3 vs. PT 7.4 PPC performance?

one problem i've been having that i can't seem to find is, when i hit 3 to record, the record and play buttons blink and it waits like 5 seconds then starts just fine. If i hit play then record (in quick punch) it starts immediately. I feel like i'm just being dumb and can't find something i clicked somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2008, 06:16 PM
reichman's Avatar
reichman reichman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 2,412
Default Re: PT 7.3 vs. PT 7.4 PPC performance?

Thought I'd follow up on my previous post. After 4 days of solid work in Pro Tools LE 7.4cs2, I'm very happy I upgraded. There are more parameters to tweak in the Playback Engine menu, so in some circumstances (editing), one can configure 7.4 to be even faster than 7.3. All my old sessions sound fine.

And what I find interesting are the unadvertised fixes in this version: drag and drop from the Finder is smoother (the occasional crash seems to be gone), and using the key command opt-cmd-left arrow for play with pre and post roll is much quicker. The function is the same, but the underlying code seems to have changed.

SoundMiner 3.2cs10 works fine.

I have yet to listen closely to Elastic Time to see if it's comparable to Pitch 'n' Time Pro, any opinions on this?

I was crashing about twice a week in 7.3.1cs5. No crashes at all with 7.4cs2 since installation. Thumbs up for Digidesign!

Best,

Nathaniel Reichman
__________________
Nathaniel Reichman
Producer/Re-recording Mixer - New York
Nathaniel Reichman | IMDB | LinkedIn
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mac Pro Performance master-fader macOS 0 11-21-2011 02:08 PM
PT9 Performance? Chingy Pro Tools 9 4 11-09-2010 03:20 PM
More RAM = no better performance?!? fly-deluxe 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 10 01-09-2004 06:14 PM
OSX vs OS9 performance Stage 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) 8 05-23-2003 06:58 PM
about HD performance 8e design Storage Subsystems 1 07-28-2002 10:08 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:43 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited. Forum Hosted By: URLJet.com