|
Avid Pro Audio CommunityHow to Join & Post • Community Terms of Use • Help Us Help YouKnowledge Base Search • Community Search • Learn & Support |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Waves Audio AAX DSP ??
Why did not adopt the Company Waves Audio Plugins AAX DSP now
www.waves.com HDX system been more than 7 months Waves company is one of the best companies and most important companies So far, no Plugins are supported AAX DSP When Thanks & Regards
__________________
Mac Pro Quad-Core 8 Intel Xeon 2.4 Mac OS X 10.7.4 Avid Pro Tools HDX Avid C24 Avid I/O 16*16 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Waves Audio AAX DSP
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Waves Audio AAX DSP
this company Waves Audio
Hi, Waves V9 plugins are supported on Pro Tools 10 via RTAS, AudioSuite, and TDM. AAX is not officially supported at this time. AAX Native will be supported at a later date, but this development will still take more time. Waves has no plans to support AAX DSP at this time. Thanks
__________________
Mac Pro Quad-Core 8 Intel Xeon 2.4 Mac OS X 10.7.4 Avid Pro Tools HDX Avid C24 Avid I/O 16*16 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Waves Audio AAX DSP
I see AVID company should speed up the pressure on the company Waves
__________________
Mac Pro Quad-Core 8 Intel Xeon 2.4 Mac OS X 10.7.4 Avid Pro Tools HDX Avid C24 Avid I/O 16*16 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Waves Audio AAX DSP
Quote:
....And I wonder how fast these new Mac Pros will be? Honestly Avid, you need to PAY Waves to do an AAX DSP version.
__________________
Dave Marsden UK |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Waves Audio AAX DSP
You're kidding, right?
Waves would take a huge hit if they suddenly stopped supporting Pro Tools. It's in neither company's interest. Plenty of other companies already on board... in fact, Waves is pretty much the only major plugin dev who isn't.
__________________
D a n t h e I n c r e d i b l e S o u n d M a n "Svetlana" v1 - 4.2GHz i7, 16GB RAM, OSX 10.7.4 Liquid Saffire 56 - PT10.2 - BFD2, VCC, Duende Native, Play 3.0 _C U R R E N T-D V E R B-S C O R E:515 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Waves Audio AAX DSP
I've been reading the posts on here, and I've seen people saying, "Avid you should pay Waves to make AAX DSP" and "if Waves doesn't support AAX DSP, there is no reason for me to upgrade to HDX"............WHAT THE HELL!!!??? Do you people really think it is Waves plugins that make your mixes sound good? If that is what you think, you better get a different day job. Don't get me wrong, Waves makes a fantastic plugin. But there are other companies that make plugins that sound just as good, McDSP, UAD, AVID, etc., there is no other company that makes a complete system of DSP processing like Avid!! I'm not just talking plugin DSP, but the whole thing, plugins, mixing, I/O, who else does that? Nobody!! If you like Pro Tools TDM and it is rock solid, then keep it. Don't blame Avid because Waves has a stick up their ass about making AAX DSP plugins, blame Waves. If you want to move to HDX (because you see the benefits of the power of the card) move to HDX and look into some other plugins. Pro Tools is the base, or foundation of the system, the plugins are the finishing touches. You wouldn't eat a cake made out of dog [bleep][bleep][bleep][bleep] if the frosting was Betty Crocker chocolate frosting. As far as the other comment about paying Waves.......... Duh! That's like Mcdonalds paying me to eat a Big Mac, sure that is good for me, but not good business for McDonalds. Some people should not be in this business or even doing the hobby if all they are going to do is spew nonsense, which makes the rest of the professionals look bad!
__________________
That is bunches of crunch! |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Waves Audio AAX DSP
Well said (technically "Well written" ) and quite true!
__________________
********** Main DAW: MacPRO 7.1, 16-Core Xeon 3.2GHz, 196 GB RAM, OSX 10.15.2, HDX3, PT 2019.12 Ultimate, 2x UAD-2 PCIe Octo's, Raven MTZ, 1x HD Omni, 2x HD I/O's, 1x MTRX and some more cool stuff... Auxilary DAW: MacBook Pro with Retina Display (2012), 2.6GHz quad-core Intel Core i7, 16GB RAM, OSX 10.13.6, PT2019 Ultimate, 1x UAD Apollo Quad Audio Interface /w Thunderbolt Interface (v9.x) ********** |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Waves Audio AAX DSP
Quote:
If you can't make a decent mix with just the stock plugins, you need a new profession. The tools don't make the engineer. A carpenter isn't going to throw out his hammer because his favourite brand of nails stops making them.
__________________
D a n t h e I n c r e d i b l e S o u n d M a n "Svetlana" v1 - 4.2GHz i7, 16GB RAM, OSX 10.7.4 Liquid Saffire 56 - PT10.2 - BFD2, VCC, Duende Native, Play 3.0 _C U R R E N T-D V E R B-S C O R E:515 |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Waves Audio AAX DSP
It's not that simple. I have a bunch of sessions that are loaded with Waves plugins and while I'm remixing with mostly Softube, and a few Waves RTAS, the fact remains that I'm VERY familiar with the Waves Mercury bundle and I have to go through a process that took years to develop.
Another truth which is being stated several times is that "without Waves AAX-DSP I'm not buying HDX". this is clearly hurting HDX sales, Waves understands that and must be asking, without AVID incentives, why should they pay to promote HDX? If Waves will sell HDX, AVID has, for better or worse, a partner that needs to be adressed. And this means compensation for the expected increase in HDX sales. Standard business. Like electric cars, if the car companies don't assist with the cost of power stations, nobody will buy electric cars. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
audio and waves don't match | sierra2010 | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 10-28-2008 08:02 AM |
Waves IR-L stops passing audio??? | SHIRK | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 3 | 08-30-2006 08:02 PM |
Has anyone bought a PC from "Digital Audio Waves" | jadedstate | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Win) | 0 | 06-24-2005 08:38 PM |
Waves Audio Processing Accelerators | scotsman | Pro Tools TDM Systems (Mac) | 12 | 06-10-2005 12:08 AM |
002 Core Audio Driver & Waves for OSX | Musepro | 003, Mbox 2, Digi 002, original Mbox, Digi 001 (Mac) | 2 | 09-08-2003 11:14 AM |